condensation of aldehydes with primary amines,9 is obviously
an attractive way for accessing nitrones. Unfortunately,
oxidation of imines to nitrones (Scheme 1, path A) is not an
optimized MTO-catalyzed oxidation of imines 2a-v to the
corresponding nitrones 1a-v are shown in Table 1. Imines
2a-r have been prepared by condensation of aldehydes with
primary amines and pyrrolines 2s-v by HCl elimination
from the corresponding N-chloroamines. Remarkably, pyr-
roline (and tetrahydropyridine) ketimines and aldimines, e.g.,
2u and 2v, are both accessible regioselectively from the same
2-substituted N-chloroamines by elimination with different
bases.19 Oxidations have been performed with 2 mol % of
MTO and urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP) as the stoichio-
metric oxidant. UHP is a solid complex used as a practical
and safe source of H2O2.20 It conveniently replaces hydrogen
peroxide aqueous solutions when compounds sensitive to
hydrolysis, such as 1 and 2, are involved. All of the substrates
reached complete conversion, apart from imine 2q. This
suggested that bulky substituents have detrimental effects
on reactivity, as proved by the low yields in entries 17 and
18. N-Arylnitrones are known to suffer from low stability
under a variety of conditions.21 This may account for the
moderate yield obtained for nitrone 1c (Table 1, entry 3).
The oxidation was highly selective; the crude reaction
mixtures showed no trace of oxaziridines or other oxidation
products, but only minor amounts of hydrolysis compounds
in few cases. Variations in peroxometal catalytic species,
H2O2 source, and solvent used resulted in poorer conversion
and/or yield. MTO was much more effective than other
related catalysts: for example, Na2WO4/UHP in MeOH did
oxidize 2a to nitrone 1a, but only 35% conversion was
achieved after 21 h. We were surprised at the different
chemoselectivity reported for the oxidation of imines with
Na2WO4/H2O2 in acetonitrile, which were claimed to afford
oxaziridines only.14j However, in our hands, this reaction gave
no detectable amount of any oxidation product from imine
2e. Similarly, MTO/H2O2 in acetonitrile gave only 20%
conversion of 2e after 16 h, producing a complex mixture
containing only trace amount of nitrone 1e and oxaziridine
3e. This finding confirmed the paramount importance of
using alcoholic solvents in MTO-catalyzed oxidations of
nitrogenated compounds. Our experimental data suggest that
nitrones are formed by direct N-oxidation,13 i.e., attack of
the lone pair of the imine nitrogen atom to the peroxo moiety
of the active Re catalyst. Accordingly, the reaction is only
barely sensitive to electronic substituent effects. Intermediate
formation of an oxaziridine rearranging to a nitrone was ruled
out. Indeed, oxaziridine 3b, synthesized according to a known
procedure,14f was unaffected by treatment with MTO or
MTO/UHP in MeOH. Concerning the fundamental issue of
regioselective formation of nitrones, entries 9, 15, 21, and
Scheme 1. Oxidation of Imines 2 to Nitrones 1 or
Oxaziridines 3
easy task. Only one procedure, employing excess perman-
ganate under phase-transfer conditions,10 is quite general and
affords reasonable yields. However, serious drawbacks
concerning selectivity10,11 and failure to afford the desired
nitrones from cyclic imines12 were reported. Imines may yield
several products by oxidation and control of selectivity is
challenging.13 Oxaziridines 3 are the most common oxidation
products with a variety of reagents (path B).13,14 In some
instances, they may rearrange to nitrones under acid catalysis
(path C).15 Other oxidants gave amides or rearranged
compounds.11,16 Only a few of these procedures employed
environmentally benign oxidants with metal catalysts.14h-j
It is noteworthy that no catalytic procedure for the oxidation
of imines to nitrones has been reported so far. Recently,
methyltrioxorhenium (MTO) became popular as a catalyst
for alkene epoxidation.17 Hydrogen peroxide is the usual
stoichiometric oxidant, responsible for formation of the
catalytically active peroxorhenium species.17 Several other
functional groups have been oxidized by MTO/H2O2. During
our studies in this area, we noticed that N-oxidation of
nitrogenated compounds by MTO occurs readily.6c,d,18 There-
fore, we envisaged that MTO might serve as a suitable
catalyst for oxidizing imines to nitrones. The results of
(9) Patai, S. The Chemistry of the Carbon-Nitrogen Double Bond;
Wiley: New York, 1970.
(10) Christensen, D.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 126-
131.
(11) Larsen, J.; Jørgensen, K. A.; Christensen, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1991, 1187-1190.
(12) Busque´, F.; de March, P.; Figueredo, M.; Font, J.; Gallagher, T.;
Mila´n, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 437-445.
(13) (a) Ogata, Y.; Sawaki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4687-4692.
(b) Boyd, D. R.; Coulter, P. B.; McGuckin, M. R.; Sharma, N. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 301-306.
(14) Peracids: (a) ref 10. (b) Kitagawa, O.; Vander Velde, D.; Dutta,
D.; Morton, M.; Takusagawa, F.; Aube´, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
5169-5178. Sulfonic peracids: (c) Kluge, R.; Schulz, M.; Liebsch, S.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5773-5782. Oxone: (d) Davis, F. A.; Chatto-
padhyay, S.; Towson, J. C.; Lal, S.; Reddy, T. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
2087-2089. (e) Hajipour, A. R.; Pyne, S. G. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1992,
388. Tetrabutylammonium Oxone: (f) Mohajer, D.; Iranpoor, N.; Rezaeifard,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 631-634. UHP with maleic anhydride: (g)
Damavandi, J. A.; Karami, B.; Zolfigol, M. A. Synlett 2002, 933-934. O2
and metal catalysts: (h) Martiny, L.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1995, 699-704. (i) Lin, Y.-M.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 8282-8285. H2O2 and cat. Na2WO4: (j) Shailaja, M.; Manjula, A.;
Rao, B. V. Synlett 2005, 1176-1178.
(18) (a) Cardona, F.; Soldaini, G.; Goti, A. Synlett 2004, 1553-1556.
(b) Saladino, R.; Neri, V.; Cardona, F.; Goti, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004,
346, 639-647. For related studies by other groups, see: (c) Murray, R.
W.; Iyanar, K.; Chen, J.; Wearing, J. T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8099-
8102. (d) Yamazaki, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 877-883. (e)
Zauche, T. H.; Espenson, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5257-5261. (f)
Cope´ret, C.; Adolfsson, H.; Khuong, T.-A. V.; Yudin, A. K.; Sharpless, K.
B. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1740-1741.
(15) Lin, Y.-M.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7451-7458.
(16) (a) An, G.-i.; Kim, M.; Kim, J. Y.; Rhee, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 2183-2186. (b) Nongkunsarn, P.; Ramsden, C. A. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 3805-3830.
(17) For reviews, see: (a) Herrmann, W. A.; Ku¨hn, F. E. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1997, 30, 169-180. (b) Espenson, J. H. Chem. Commun. 1999, 479-
488.
(19) Davis, B. G.; Maughan, M. A. T.; Chapman, T. M.; Villard, R.;
Courtney, S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 103-106.
(20) Heaney, H. Top. Curr. Chem. 1993, 164, 1-19.
(21) Cordero, F. M.; Barile, I.; Brandi, A.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; de Meijere,
A. Synlett 2000, 1034-1036.
474
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 3, 2007