THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 288, NO. 37, pp. 26908–26913, September 13, 2013
© 2013 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A.
Author’s Choice
Roles of Phosphate Recognition in Inositol
1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase (IPK1) Substrate
Binding and Activation*
Received for publication, May 24, 2013, and in revised form, July 22, 2013 Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 24, 2013, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M113.487777
Varin Gosein‡ and Gregory J. Miller‡§¶1
From the ‡Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montre´al, Que´bec H3G 1Y6, Canada, the §Groupe de
Recherche Axe´ sur la Structure des Prote´ines, McGill University, Montre´al, Que´bec H3G 0B1, Canada, and the ¶Department of
Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Background: The mechanism of substrate recognition for IPK1 (inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase) is unresolved.
Results: Binding and activity data reveal specific roles for each phosphate of IP5.
Conclusion: The phosphate profile of IP5 is mechanistically critical to IPK1 activation.
Significance: Identifying determinants of substrate specificity will aid in the design of selective inhibitors for IPK1.
Inositol phosphate kinases (IPKs) sequentially phosphorylate
inositol phosphates (IPs) to yield a group of small signaling mole-
culesinvolvedindiversecellularprocesses. IPK1(inositol1,3,4,5,6-
pentakisphosphate 2-kinase) phosphorylates inositol 1,3,4,5,6-
pentakisphosphate to inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate;
however, the mechanism of IP recognition employed by IPK1 is
currently unresolved. We demonstrated previously that IPK1 pos-
sesses an unstable N-terminal lobe in the absence of IP, which led
us to propose that the phosphate profile of the IP was linked to
stabilization of IPK1. Here, we describe a systematic study to deter-
mine the roles of the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 6-phosphate groups of inositol
1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate in IP binding and IPK1 activation.
The 5- and 6-phosphate groups were the most important for IP
binding to IPK1, and the 1- and 3-phosphate groups were more
important for IPK1 activation than the others. Moreover, we dem-
onstrate that there are three critical residues (Arg-130, Lys-170,
and Lys-411) necessary for IPK1 activity. Arg-130 is the only sub-
strate-binding N-terminal lobe residue that can render IPK1 inac-
tive; its 1-phosphate is critical for full IPK1 activity and for stabili-
zation of the active conformation of IPK1. Taken together, our
results support the model for recognition of the IP substrate by
IPK1 in which (i) the 4-, 5-, and 6-phosphates are initially recog-
nized by the C-terminal lobe, and subsequently, (ii) the interaction
between the 1-phosphate and Arg-130 stabilizes the N-terminal
lobe and activates IPK1. This model of IP recognition, believed to
be unique among IPKs, could be exploited for selective inhibition
of IPK1 in future studies that investigate the role of higher IPs.
DNA editing and repair (2), vesicle transport (3), and ion chan-
nel regulation (4) and has been implicated in diseases such as
cancer and diabetes (5). IPs are produced by sequential phos-
phorylation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate by a family of
enzymes known as IP kinases (IPKs) (1). Similarity between IPs,
which sometimes differ by only one phosphate group on the
inositol ring, demands that IPKs use mechanisms to recognize
and phosphorylate specific positions of their IP substrates while
excluding highly similar molecules. Crystal structures from
each of the IPK subfamilies have revealed that the structural
determinants for IP discrimination vary between IPKs. IP3K
(Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase) employs shape comple-
mentarity to recognize precisely positioned phosphate and
hydroxyl groups of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (6). In contrast,
ITPK1 (inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase/inositol 3,4,5,6-
tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase) discriminates among IPs using
phosphate affinity and stereochemical features to establish
contacts with phosphates that are sufficient for substrate rec-
ognition (7). Crystal structures of IPK1 (inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pen-
takisphosphate 2-kinase) in its IP substrate- and product-
bound forms reveal extensive contacts with all phosphate
groups of the bound IPs (8). These structures reveal how inosi-
tol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate (IP5) is phosphorylated on its
axial 2Ј-hydroxyl, yielding inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphos-
phate, but they do not suggest a mechanism through which
IPK1 selectively recognizes IP5 as its substrate while excluding
other highly phosphorylated IPs with free axial 2Ј-hydroxyl
groups. We recently determined the crystal structure of wild-
type IPK1 in an IP-free state, which exhibited disorder within
Inositol phosphates (IPs)2 are a group of small molecules that its N-terminal lobe (N-lobe) of the kinase, centered at Arg-130
play critical roles in cellular signaling (1). IP signaling regulates (9). This IP-free structure suggests that binding of IP substrate
plays a role in stabilization of the N- and C-lobes of the kinase,
which is an important step in the activation of protein kinases
* This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
(10–12).
Operating Grant MOP-93687 (to G. J. M.) and a CIHR Strategic Training Ini-
Our current objective was to define the contributions of
tiative in Chemical Biology grant (to V. G.).
Author’s Choice—Final version full access.
the individual phosphate groups of the IP to binding and to
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry, The
Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064. Tel.: 202-319-
4766; Fax: 202-319-5381; E-mail: millergj@cua.edu.
2 The abbreviations used are: IP, inositol phosphate; IPK, IP kinase; IP5, inositol
1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate; N-lobe, N-terminal lobe; C-lobe, C-terminal
lobe; ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry; AMP-PNP, adenosine 5Ј-(,␥-
imido)triphosphate; IP4, inositol tetrakisphosphate.
26908 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
VOLUME 288•NUMBER 37•SEPTEMBER 13, 2013