D. Majumdar, S. Dey, A. Kumari et al.
Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 254 (2021) 119612
2.4. X-ray crystallographic data collection and refinement
cooling the solution which was collected and air-dried. N,N0-bis(5-
bromo-3-methoxysalicylidenimino)-1,3-diaminopropane (H2L1):
Yield: 0.215 g (85.8%) Anal. Calc. for C19H20 Br2N2O4: C 45.62; H
Light yellow crystals of the Zn dicyanamide complexes were
grown after slow evaporation of methanol solvent in the presence
of a few drops of acetonitrile (ACN). Data on a Bruker SMART CCD
4.03; N 5.60 Found: C 45.66; H 4.08; N 5.62%. IR (KBr cmꢃ1
)
selected bands:
m(C@N) 1648 vs, m(CAOphenolic) 1229 s, m(OAH)
[40] diffractometer using Mo K radiation at k = 0.71073 Å (277–
3430 s, 1H NMR (DMSO d6 400 MHz): d (ppm): 3.75 (s, 3H1),
a
296 K) were collected by selecting four excellent quality crystals.
Here it is necessary to have an observation that judicious crystal
data collection purpose we have applied for some basic programs:
SMART for collecting frames of data indexing reflections and deter-
mining lattice parameters SAINT [41] SADAB [42] and SHELXTL for
space group structure determination and least-squares refine-
ments on F2. The crystal structure was solved by full-matrix
least-squares methods against F2 using the program SHELXL-2014
[43] and Olex-2 software [44]. Non-H atoms (all) were refined with
anisotropic displacement parameters, and all hydrogen positions
were fixed at calculated positions which are refined iso-
tropically. We designed various crystallographic figures using Dia-
mond software. The crystallographic data and full structure refine-
ment parameters are submitted in Table 1.
7.06–7.17 (m, 1H2 1H3), 8.48 (m, 1H5), 13.91 (m,1H4), 3.04–3.75
(s, 2H6), 2.48 (s, 6H7), 13C NMR (DMSO d6 75.45 MHz):
d
(ppm):54.94–56.46 (O-1CH3),117.23–150.18 (Arom-3C-5C),153.71
(7C-OH), 165.77 (8CH@N), 31.40 (ACA(9CH2)2), UV–Vis (kmax CH3-
OH): 229, 292 and 425 nm.
N,N0-bis(3-ethoxysalicylidene)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanedia
mine (H2L2): Yield: 0.178 g (89.4%) Anal. Calc. for C23H30N2O4: C
69.32; H 7.59; N 7.03 Found: C 69.60; H 7.62; N 7.01%. IR (KBr
cmꢃ1) selected bands:
m(C@N) 1638 vs, m(CAOphenolic)1245 s, m
(OAH) 3436 s, 1H NMR (DMSO d6 400 MHz): d (ppm): 1.31–1.34
(s, 3H2), 4.04 (H1), 6.77–7.03 (m, 1H3 1H4 1H5), 8.53 (m, 1H7),
13.90 (m,1H6) 3.99 (s, 2H8) 0.98(s, 6H9),13C NMR (DMSO d6
75.45 MHz): d (ppm):15.2 (2CH3) 64.2–67.0 (O-1CH2),116.3–147.6
(Arom-4C-6C),152.2 (8C-OH), 167.3 (9CH@N), 24.0 (11C-(CH3)236.1
((CH3)2-C-(10CH2)2), UV–Vis (kmax CH3OH): 226, 263 and 420 nm.
2.5. Synthesis of N,N0-bis(5-bromo-3-methoxysalicylidenimino)-1,3-
diaminopropane and N,N0-bis(3-ethoxysalicylidene)-2,2-dimethyl-
1,3-propanediamine
2.6. Synthesis of complex [Zn2(L1)(m1,5-dca)2(m1-dca)]n (1)
Zinc acetate dihydrate (0.219 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL
of methanol. Then a methanolic solution of the ligand (H2L1)
(0.502 g, 1 mmol) was added to it followed by the drop-wise addi-
tion of an aqueous solution of Sodium dicyanamide ((0.0891 g,
1 mmol). The resultant mixture could stir for 1 h at 45 °C. Then 5
drops of acetonitrile (ACN) were added and it continued stirring
for the next 1 hr. The bright yellow solution was filtered and kept
refrigerated for crystallization. After a few days block size yellow-
coloured single crystals suitable for SCXRD were obtained. Crystals
were isolated by filtration and air-dried. Yield: 0.457 g (59.8%)
Anal. Calc. for C23H18 Br2N8O4Zn2: C 36.30; H 2.38; N 14.72. Found:
Pro-ligands (H2L1-H2L2) have been synthesized in our labora-
tory following the literature method (Scheme 1) [45]. The reflux
condensation of 5-bromo-3-methoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde
(0.231 g, 1 mmol) with 1,3-diaminopropane (0.0371 g, 0.5 mmol)
in (50 mL) methanol at 80 °C for 3 h prepared H2L1. A similar pro-
cedure was used for the synthesis of H2L2 except 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-
propanediamine (0.0511 g, 0.5 mmol) condensed with 3-ethoxy-2-
hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.166 g, 1 mmol). The solvent was removed
under vacuum and the yellow powder product separated out upon
C 36.26; H 2.40; N 14.75%. IR (KBr cmꢃ1) selected bands:
1580 s, (C„N) 2281 m, 2170 s,
(ArAO),1243 FT-Raman (cmꢃ1
selected bands: (C@N) 1632 s,
(C„N) 2286 s, 2218 m, 1H NMR
m(C@N)
m
m
)
Table 1
m
m
Crystal data and structure refinement parameters.
(DMSO d6 400 MHz): d (ppm): 3.48 (s 3H1), 7.17–7.31 (m, 1H2
1H3), 9.85 (m, 1H4), 3.48–3.84 (s, 2H5), 1.94–2.02 (s, 6H6), UV–
Vis kmax (DMSO): 374 nm.
Formula
C23H18 Br2N8O4Zn2 (1) C27H28N8O4Zn2 (2)
M/g
761.01
659.31
Crystal system
Space group
Monoclinic
C 1 2/c 1
17.442(2)
22.398(2)
14.2406(17)
97.160(6)
5519.9(12)
8
Monoclinic
P 1 21/c 1
8.7023(3)
18.8101(7)
17.6730(7)
92.107(2)
2892.91(19)
4
2.7. Synthesis of complex [Zn2(L2)(m1,5-dca)2(m1-dca)]n (2)
a/Å
b/Å
c/Å
b (°)
V/Å3
Z
We obtained 2 in a similar procedure as in the case of 1 using
ligand (H2L2) (0.398 g, 1 mmol) in methanol. Block single size crys-
tals suitable for SCXRD were got after a few days. Filtration and iso-
lated crystals air-dried. Yield: 0.778 g (59.3%) Anal. Calc. for
q
l
c/gcmꢃ3
1.831
4.679
1.514
1.706
/mmꢃ1
C
27H28N8O4Zn2: C 53.15; H 4.31; N 12.82. Found: C 53.11; H
4.35; N 12.90%. IR (KBr cmꢃ1) selected bands:
(C@N) 1621 vs,
(C„N) 2208 s, 2178 m,
(ArAO),1225 FT-Raman (cmꢃ1) selected
bands: (C@N) 1630 vs, m
(C„N) 2278 m, 2239 vs, 1H NMR
F (000)
2992
1352
Cryst size (mm3)
h range (deg)
Limiting indices
0.065 ꢂ 0.045 ꢂ 0.033 0.078 ꢂ 0.061 ꢂ 0.045
m
m
m
2.171 to 25.500
ꢃ21 ꢄ h ꢄ 21
ꢃ27 ꢄ k ꢄ 27
ꢃ17 ꢄ l ꢄ 17
81,448
2.45 to 22.65
ꢃ10 ꢄ h ꢄ 9
ꢃ20 ꢄ k ꢄ 22
ꢃ21 ꢄ l ꢄ 21
20,636
5381 [Rint = 0.0682
Rsigma = 0.0741]
1.000
m
(DMSO d6 400 MHz): d (ppm): 1.47 (s, 3H1), 4.17 (H2), 6.30–7.16
(m, 1H3 1H4 1H5), 8.44 (m, 1H6), 3.35–3.76 (s, 2H8), 0.95 (s, 6H9),
UV–Vis kmax (DMSO): 358 nm.
Reflns collected
Ind reflns
5135 [Rint = 0.0981
Rsigma = 0.0350]
0.999
Completeness to h (%)
3. Results and discussion
Refinement method
Full-matrix-block
least-squares on F2
5135/0/354
1.076
R1 = 0.0480
Full-matrix-block
least-squares on F2
5381/6/374
1.074
R1 = 0.0555
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
3.1. Synthetic rationalization
N2O4-type pro-ligands were synthesized according to the
method stated (Scheme 1) [45]. Zn complexes derived from pro-
ligands were prepared in moderate good yield by taking the fol-
lowing more familiar in situ procedure where (1:1:1 M) of zinc
acetate dihydrate, respective Schiff base ligands, and Sodium
[I > 2h(I)]
R indices (all data)
wR2 = 0.1271
R1 = 0.0667
wR2 = 0.1382
1.565 and ꢃ0.754
wR2 = 0.1316
R1 = 0.1036
wR2 = 0.1601
0.983 and ꢃ0.488
Largest diff. peak and hole
(eꢁÅꢃ3
)
3