(
Au)22 (b). In each system, the m value steeply increases with an
further accounted for in terms of both the increase in the
increase in n, and the increment of m for (Au)10 is larger than
that for (Au)22 at the same n. Recently, the research group
2
efficiency of the photoinduced electron transfer from TiO to
Au and the decrease in the stabilization of charged Au NPs by
water solvation. This method is applicable to various metal-
semiconductor coupling systems, providing important infor-
mation on the design of metal NP-loaded semiconductor
photocatalytic reactions.
of Kamat has prepared Au(3 o d o 8 nm)/TiO particles using
2
3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) as a bifunctional coupling
agent, measuring the Fermi energy of Au/TiO in a toluene-
2
ꢀ
43
ethanol mixed solvent using C60/C60 as a redox pair. As a
0
result, they observed a trend opposite to ours that the E
F
increases with decreasing d, attributing this to the quantum size
effect of Au NPs. Clearly, the change in m in Fig. 7A is
overestimated; however, the trend is in agreement with that
reported by Kamat et al. Also, the research group of Goodman
has revealed using scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (C) No. 16550169 and (B) No. 20350097
from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport, and Culture,
Japan.
that an Au particle formed on the surface of a TiO single
2
crystal undergoes metal-to-nonmetal transformation when its
dimension is smaller than 3.5 nm in diameter ꢂ 1.0 nm
4
4
in height. Therefore, in low polar solvents such as a
toluene–ethanol mixed solvent (relative dielectric constant,
References
1
M. Jin, X. Zhang, S. Nishimoto, Z. Liu, D. A. Tryk, A. V.
Emeline, T. Murakami and A. Fujishima, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2007, 111, 658, and the references therein.
e = 13.8), the m value for the same n would increase with
r
decreasing d because of the increase in the gap of adjacent
energy levels. Fig. 7B shows the m value calculated with the
PCM taking the solvent effect by water as a function of n for
2
3
4
5
K. Rajeshwar, N. R. De Tacconi and C. R. Chenthamarakshan,
Chem. Mater., 2001, 13, 2765, and the references therein.
V. Subramanian, E. Wolf and P. V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2001, 105, 11439.
(
Au)10 (a) and (Au)22 (b). The m value for each cluster in water is
A. Wood, M. Giersig and P. Mulvaney, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001,
close to that in vacuum at n = 0, increasing with increasing n;
however, the increment significantly decreases to be exactly
comparable with the experimental data (Fig. 3B). These find-
ings indicate that charged Au NPs are greatly stabilized in water
by the solvation. Consequently, the difference in m between
1
05, 8810.
K. Hashimoto, H. Irie and A. Fujishima, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2005,
4, 8269.
4
6 H. Li, Z. Bian, J. Zhu, Y. Huo, H. Li and Y. Lu, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 4538.
7
G. Palmisano, V. Augugliaro, M. Pagliaro and L. Palmisano,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 3425.
(
Au)10 and (Au)22 becomes small and the magnitudes of m are
even interchanged in an irregular way. Fig. 7C shows the
difference in m between in vacuum and in water (Dm =
m(water) ꢀ m(vacuum)) for (Au)10 (a) and (Au)22 (b). The fact
8 H. Tada, K. Teranishi, Y. -i. Inubushi and S. Ito, Chem. Commun.,
998, 2345.
1
9
H. Tada, F. Suzuki, S. Yoneda, S. Ito and H. Kobayashi, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 1376.
0 H. Tada, T. Ishida, A. Takao, S. Ito, S. Mukhopadhyay, T. Akita,
nꢀ
nꢀ
that (Au)10 clusters are more stabilized than (Au)22 clusters
1
is consistent with the higher charge density per Au atom for
nꢀ
K. Tanaka and H. Kobayashi, ChemPhysChem, 2005, 6, 1537.
11 H. Tada, T. Ishida, A. Takao and S. Ito, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 7898.
(
Au)10 , pointing out the important contribution of the
0
1
2 D. Cahen, G. Hodes, M. Graetzel, J. F. Guillemoles and I. Riess,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 2053.
solvation energy to the EF in water (e = 80.1). Unexpectedly,
r
0
43
the EF for the Au/TiO in a toluene-ethanol solution is lower
2
13 Y. Nakato, M. Shioji and H. Tsubomura, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1982,
90, 453.
than that determined by in water by ca. 0.2 eV. A possible
explanation is that 3-MPA used as a coupling agent suppresses
the interfacial electron transfer because an insulating layer with
1
1
4 M. Jakob, H. Levanon and P. V. Kamat, Nano Lett., 2003, 3, 353.
5 H. Tada, T. Soejima, S. Ito and H. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 15952.
16 S. Tsubota, M. Haruta, T. Kobayashi, A. Ueda and Y. Nakahara,
Preparation of Catalysis V, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991.
45
thickness of only 0.2 nm acts as a significant barrier. Thus, we
0
concluded that a predominant factor for determining E
F
is the
1
7 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A.
Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr,
R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D.
Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V.
Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo,
S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K.
Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B.
Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A.
Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin,
D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara,
C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen,
M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S.
Replogle and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 98 (Revision A5), Gaussian
Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
solvation of charged metal NPs and their quantum size effect in
polar media and in low polar media, respectively, and the
0
increase in E
F
with increasing d in water arises from the
to
increase in the efficiency of the electron transfer from TiO
2
Au and the relative decrease in the stabilization energy due to
water solvation.
4
. Conclusions
The Fermi energy of Au NPs directly coupled with TiO
0
2
at the
) has been determined by the use of
photostationary state (E
F
1
8 (a) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 1372; (b) A. D. Becke,
J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648.
2
S/S having a specific interaction with Au as a redox probe.
ꢀ
0
The E
F
in water increases as the mean size of Au NPs
19 P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson and J. A. Pople, Int. J. Quantum
Chem. Symp., 1992, 26, 319.
(
of Au/TiO -photocatalyzed reductions increase and the TiO -
d) increases at 3.0 r d r 13 nm. The photocatalytic activities
2
2
0 A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38, 3098.
1 C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785.
2
2
PL intensities of Au/TiO decrease with increasing d in parallel
2
22 P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82, 270; P. J. Hay
and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82, 299.
0
with E . These results support the conclusion, which could be
F
6
560 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 6553–6561
This journal is ꢁc the Owner Societies 2008