Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
A. Rocha et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 4930–4933
4933
Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+ was evaluated in dichloromethane solution.
Among the cations studied, probes 1 and 2 have demonstrated a
remarkable selectivity for Ag+ and a high affinity for Hg2+ at higher
concentrations, and a stronger interaction with silver(I), depending
on the mobility of the indole ring according to the crown chain
length. The observed selectivity of the new probes is of interest
due to their use as building blocks in the design of more complex
chemosensors for this metal ion.
9. (a) Czarnik, A. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 302–308; (b) Prasanna de Silva, A.;
Gunaratne, H. W. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J. M.; McCoy, C. P.;
Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566.
10. See for example: Gokel, G. W.; Leevy, W. M.; Weber, M. E. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104,
2723–2750.
11. Morozumi, T.; Anada, T.; Nakamura, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 2923–2931;
Mello, J. V.; Finney, N. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1536–1538.
12. Levkoskaya, G. G.; Rudyakova, E. V.; Mirskova, A. N. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 38,
1641–1646.
13. General procedure: To a stirring solution of indole (503 mg, 4.3 mmol) and
thiourea (650 mg, 8.6 mmol) in degassed methanol (9 mL), was slowly added a
solution of iodine (1.1 g, 4.3 mmol)and KI (713 mg, 4.3 mmol) in degassed
Acknowledgments
water (3 mL), at room temperature. After consumption of the indole,
degassed 20% aqueous solution of NaOH was added, and the resulting
mixture was refluxed for 10 min. The dibromide (0.9 mmol) was then
a
6
The authors are grateful to REQUIMTE Research Fund for finan-
cial support. C.L. thanks Xunta de Galicia, Spain, for the Isidro Parga
Pondal Research Program and INOU-UVIGO K914/2009 Research
Project.
added and the resulting mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature.
The mixture was diluted with 10 mL of water and extracted with
dichloromethane (2ꢁ, 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over sodium
sulfate, filtered, and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The crude
was purified by column chromatography (silica, ethyl ether/hexane, 9:1) to
afford pure
1 (439 mg, 28%): IR (film)
m
max/cmꢀ1 3400; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz): dH 8.08 (2H, s, NH), 7.67 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, ArH), 7.31 (2H, d,
J = 7.9 Hz, ArH), 7.12 (6H, m, ArH), 3.42 (4H, t, J = 6.8 Hz, CH2OCH2), 2.75 (4H, t,
J = 6.8 Hz, SCH2); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100.63 MHz): dC 136.2, 129.7, 129.4, 122.7,
120.5, 119.4, 111.4, 105.3, 69.9, 35.3. acc. mass: 368.101476, C20H20N2OS2
requires 368.101707.
References and notes
1. Humphrey, G. R.; Kuethe, J. T. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2875–2911.
2. Li, Y.; Yang, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3527–3530; Motoyama, T.;
Shimazaki, Y.; Yajima, T.; Nakabayashi, Y.; Naruta, Y.; Yamauchi, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 7378–7385; Kaminskaia, N. V.; Ullmann, G. M.; Fulton, D. B.;
Kostié, N. M. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5004–5013; Kaminskaia, N. V.; Johnson, T.
W.; Kostié, N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8663–8664.
3. For a review see: Shimazakia, Y.; Yajimab, T.; Takanic, M.; Yamauchib, O. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 479–492.
4. Xue, Y.; Davis, A. V.; Balakrishnan, G.; Stasser, J. P.; Staehlin, B. M.; Focia, P.;
Spiro, T. G.; Penner-Hahn, J. E.; O’Halloran, T. V. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 107–
109.
14. Rabouin, D.; Perron, V.; N’Zemba, B.; Gaudreault, R.-C.; Berube, G. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 557–560.
15. Compound 2: mp: 82–84 °C; IR (film)
m
max/cmꢀ1 3400; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz): dH 8.20 (2H, s, NH), 7.76 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, ArH), 7.38–7.18 (8H, m,
ArH), 3.55 (4H, t, J = 6.9 Hz, SCH2CH2O), 3.50 (4H, s, OCH2CH2O), 2.84 (4H, t,
J = 6.9 Hz, SCH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100.63 MHz): dC 136.2, 129.8, 129.3, 122.6,
120.4, 119.2, 111.5, 111.0, 104.9, 103.4, 70.3, 70.1, 35.3. acc. mass: 414.080804,
C22H24N2O2S2 requires 414.080697.
16. Shirani, H.; Janosik, T. Synthesis 2007, 17, 2690–2698.
17. (a) Serrano-Andrés, L.; Roos, B. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 185; (b) Borin, A.
C.; Serrano-Andrés, L. Chem. Phys. 2000, 262, 253.
18. Montalti, M.; Credi, A.; Prodi, L.; Gandolfi, M. T. Handbook of Photochemistry,
3rd ed.; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, New York, 2006.
5. See for example: Lodeiro, C.; Pina, F. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 1353–1383.
6. Woodbridge, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 4320–4322.
7. For example (a) Bazzicalupi, C.; Bencini, A.; Berni, E.; Bianchi, A.; Borsari, L.;
Giorgi, C.; Valtancoli, B.; Lodeiro, C.; Lima, J. C.; Parola, A. J.; Pina, F. Dalton
Trans. 2004, 591–597; (b) Bazzicalupi, C.; Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Danesi, A.;
Giorgi, C.; Lodeiro, C.; Pina, F.; Santarelli, S.; Valtancoli, B. Chem. Commun 2005,
2630–2632; (c) Tamayo, A.; Escriche, L.; Casabó, J.; Covelo, B.; Lodeiro, C. Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2997–3004; (d) Tamayo, A.; Pedras, B.; Lodeiro, C.; Escriche,
L.; Casabó, J.; Capelo, J. L.; Covelo, B.; Kivekas, R.; Sillampa, R. Inorg. Chem. 2007,
46, 7818–7826; (e) Batista, R. M. F.; Oliveira, E.; Costa, S. P.; Lodeiro, C.; Raposo,
M. M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6575–6578; (f) Pedras, B.; Fernandes, L.;
Oliveira, E.; Rodríguez, L.; Raposo, M. M. M.; Capelo, J. L.; Lodeiro, C. Inorg.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 12, 79–85.
8. (a) Park, C. S.; Lee, J. Y.; Kang, E.-J.; Lee, J.-E.; Lee, S. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50,
671–675; (b) Schwarze, T.; Müller, H.; Dosche, C.; Klamroth, T.; Mickler, W.;
Kelling, A.; Löhmannsröben, H.-G.; Saalfrank, P.; Holdt, H.-J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 1671–1674; (c) Iyoshi, S.; Taki, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Inorg. Chem.
2008, 47, 3946–3948.
19. Absorption spectra were recorded on
a
Perkin Elmer lambda 35
spectrophotometer, and fluorescence emission on a Perkin Elmer LS45. The
linearity of the fluorescence emission versus concentration was checked in the
concentration range used (10ꢀ4–10ꢀ6 M). Corrections for the absorbed light
and dilutions were performed when necessary. All spectrofluorimetric
titrations were performed as follows:
a stock solution of the ligand (ca.
1.00 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 M) was prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of the
ligand in
a 50 mL volumetric flask and diluting to the mark with
dichloromethane UVA-sol. The titration solutions ([L = 1 = 2] = 1.00 ꢁ 10ꢀ6
and 1.00 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M) were prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock
solution. Titrations were carried out by addition of microliter amounts of
standard solutions of the ions dissolved in absolute ethanol or
dichloromethane.