Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
In order to investigate the effect of different supports on the interfacial area because two or more inorganic sVaieltwsAcrtoiculelOdnlbinee
catalytic properties of Ni, a series of 15 wt% Ni-based catalysts co-precipitated once they were in close DpOroI:x1i0m.1i0t3y9t/oC7tChCe00b4a7s9iFc
supported on AF-SZN, AF-MCM-48, and AF-γ-Al2O3 were groups.
prepared. All the samples exhibited a similar distribution of
This work was supported by IBS-R004-D1. Dr Jo and Mr. Cho
particle diameters in the STEM images (Fig. S10). The CO thank to Pavla Eliášová and Venkatesan Chithravel for valuable
chemisorption indicated a similar portion of surface Ni particles discussions.
in all the three samples (see Sections S3 of ESI†). We chose the
hydrogenation of CO2 to methane as a probe reaction since Ni
base materials are typical catalysts for this reaction. We used
Notes and references
the CO2 conversion in 1 h under the reactant gas flow at 300 °C.
The CO2 conversion in Fig. 4A shows a remarkable difference
depending on the surface functionalization and supporting
frameworks: 15-Ni-AF-γ-Al2O3 (63%), 15-Ni-AF-SZN (46%), 15-
Ni-AF-MCM-48 (37%) and 15-Ni-SZN (18 %). As this result shows,
the alumina-supported nickel catalyst showed the highest
catalytic conversion, which can be attributed to strong metal-
support interactions. On the other hand, the mesoporous silica
support, which does not have strong metal-support interactions,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
P. Munnik, P. E. de Jongh and K. P. de Jong, Chem. Rev., 2015,
115, 6687-6718.
R. J. White, R. Luque, V. L. Budarin, J. H. Clark and D. J.
Macquarrie, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 481-494.
Z. Li, T. He, L. Liu, W. Chen, M. Zhang, G. Wu and P. Chen, Chem.
Sci., 2017, 8, 781-788.
C. Wen, Y. Cui, W-L. Dai, S. Xie and K. Fan, Chem. Commun.,
2013, 49, 5195-5197.
A. B. Laursen, I. C. Man, O. L. Trinhammer, J. Rossmeisl and S.
Dahl, J. Chem. Educ., 2011, 88(12), 1711-1715.
X. Cui, X. Dai, Y. Deng and F. Shi, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19, 3665-
3675.
V. V. Kumar, G. Naresh, M. Sudhakar, C. Anjaneyulu, S. K.
Bhargava, J. Tardio, V. K. Reddy, A. H. Padmasri and A.
Venugopal, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 9872-9879.
M. K. van der Lee, A. J. van Dillen, J. H. Bitter and K. P. de Jong,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 13573-13582.
J. H. Bitter, M. K. van der Lee, A. G. T. Slotboom, A. J. van Dillen
and K. P. de Jong, Catal. Lett., 2003, 89, 139-142.
yielded
a
low catalytic conversion.20 Compared to the
mesoporous silica, the ammonium-functionalized zeolite
catalyst (15-Ni-AF-SZN) is still in a high-purity silica form.
Nonetheless, the zeolite catalyst exhibited quite a high CO2
conversion. Even after 45 h, the CO2 conversion of the 15-Ni-AF-
SZN catalyst decreased only to 42 %, indicating a high stability
of the supported metal particles (Fig. S11).
8
9
10 K. P. de Jong and J. W. Geus, Appl. Catal., 1982, 4, 41-51.
The merit of the ammonium functionalization was also
remarkable when Cu and CeO2 were sequentially impregnated
on porous supports. We supported 20 wt% Cu and 10 wt% CeO2
together on AF-SZN, and measured its catalytic activity for
preferential oxidation of CO (experimental details in Section S1
of ESI†). We used the CO conversion rate in 1 h under the
reactant gas flow at 130 °C. The Cu/CeO2-AF-SZN catalyst
achieved a conversion rate of approximately 15.2 CO mmol g-1
h-1. Compared to the results obtained from a previous report (5
wt% Cu/10 wt% CeO2-Al2O3), this value is five times higher at
the same reaction temperature.21 Even, their catalytic activity is
three times higher than that of 1 wt% Pt/10 wt% CeO2-AF-SZN
(Fig. 4B). Such a high catalytic activity can be attributed to a
large number of surface active sites of high dispersion of
supported Cu.
In conclusion, we demonstrated a high dispersion of supported
metals (and metal oxides) by basic group-functionalization on
various porous materials. The supported non-noble metal
catalysts obtained here demonstrated the potential to replace
noble-metal-based catalysts in the CO oxidation reaction. In
addition, the present strategy yielded metal and metal oxide
nanoparticles of mono-modal distributions, irrespective of the
support materials, and supported species. We could thus
reduce the complexity of interpretation of the catalytic
results.22 Such a benefit is desirable for the design of supported
catalysts. In addition, Gartmann et al. showed that functional
groups could be selectively grafted at around the mesopore
entrance of MCM-41.23 By using this strategy, we believe that
the spatial distribution of supported metal particles is
controlled by the location of functional groups in porous
materials. Furthermore, the present method allows for the
rational synthesis of multicomponent catalysts with a high
11 C. M. Lok, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2004, 147, 283-288.
12 G. L. Bezemer, P. B. Radstake, V. Koot, A. J. van Dillen, J. W.
Geus and K. P. de Jong, J. Catal., 2006, 237, 291-302.
13 C. Jo, K. Cho, J. Kim and R. Ryoo, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50
,
4175-4177.
14 J. Kim, J. Chun and R. Ryoo, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 13102-
13105.
15 W. Feitknecht, H. R. Christen and H. Studer, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem., 1956, 283, 88-95.
16 T. N. Ramesh and P. V. Kamath, Mater. Res. Bull., 2008, 43
3227-3233.
17 P. Burattin, M. Che and C. Louis, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102
2722-2732.
18 A. L. Patterson, Phys. Rev., 1939, 56, 978-982.
19 J. Zhao, M. Milanova, M. M. C. G. Warmoeskerken and V.
Dutschk, Colloids Surf., A, 2012, 413, 273-279.
20 A. Marinoiu, C. Cobzaru, M. Raceanu, M. Varlam, E. Carcadea,
,
,
C. Cernatescu and I. Stefanescu, Rev. Roum. Chim., 2015, 60
249-256.
,
21 E. Moretti, M. Lenarda, L. Storaro, A. Talon, R. Frattini, S.
Polizzi, E. Rodríguez-Castellón and A. Jiménez-López, Appl.
Catal., B, 2007, 72, 149-156.
22 E.S. Vasiliadou, E. Heracleous, I. A. Vasalos and A. A.
Lemonidou, Appl. Catal., B, 2009, 92, 90-99.
23 N. Gartmann and D. Brühwiler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009,
48, 6354-6356.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins