extending intramolecular hydroarylation to arene-alkene
substrates. In contrast to the intermolecular versions,4 only
a handful of examples have surfaced regarding transition
metal-catalyzed intramolecular hydroarylation of alkenes.1a-c,2
These methods have been limited to specific substrate classes;
a general hydroarylation method has not emerged for arene-
ene substrates. Herein we report our results from a thorough
screen, which identified RuCl3/AgOTf as a mild and efficient
catalyst for the intramolecular hydroarylation of a broad
range of arene-ene substrates.
Table 1. Selected Data from a Systematic Screening
entry
catalyst
additive
yields (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
PtCl4
15
5
20
4
23
4
40
56
18
25
0
20
83
0
0
80
6
0
0
2
40
45
AgSbF6
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
We focused our initial efforts in this area on the cyclization
of homoallylic aryl ether 1, which was selected as the first
substrate for screening of a broad spectrum of metal salts
and complexes. Transition metal complexes were chosen
from nearly all regions of the periodic table, and we assured
that reagents and catalysts, reported previously to either
promote reactivity of alkenes and alkynes toward nucleo-
philes or facilitate electrophillic metalation of arenes, were
included in the screen. A total of 67 metal salts and
complexes were evaluated under 233 reaction conditions
(Table 1, for complete data, see Supporting Information).
Metal complexes were examined in a variety of solvents,
and the effects of silver salt additives were determined.
Careful analysis of the crude reaction mixtures by 1H NMR
during the early screening period reaffirmed our initial
worries that olefin isomerization would be problematic. In
fact, nearly all of the complexes tested induced some degree
of olefin isomerization in 1, with the cases of Pd, Rh, and
Ru being particularly extensive. To further complicate
matters, multiple products were formed; in addition to 2,
seven compounds were identifed. With the exception of
PtCl4, [PtCl2(CH2CH2)]2, Cu(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3, and HfCl4,
none of the metal complexes examined showed the ability
to produce the desired product 2.
PtCl2
Pt(2,2′-Bipy)Cl2
[PtCl2(CH2CH2)]2
Cu(OTf)2
b
6
7
8
Sc(OTf)3
9
HfCl4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
AgOTf
RuCl3‚xH2O
AgSbF6
AgOTf
AgBF4
AgPF6
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
AgOTf
RuCl3
RuCl2(COD)
RuCl2(PPh3)3
Ru3(CO)12
[RuCl2(C6H6)]2
RhCl3‚xH2O
IrCl4‚xH2O
b
a Determined by 1H NMR using trichloroethylene as an internal standard.
b Using 2.5 mol % of the dimeric complex.
2 in combination with AgOTf, albeit in a lower yield.
Interestingly, neither of the three metal chlorides were able
to promote the formation of 2 without the silver additive.
Additionaly, it was found that AgOTf was not responsible
for product formation. We suspected that trace amounts of
TfOH, formed in situ, might catalyze the coupling reaction.
However, substituting anhydrous RuCl3 for the hydrate
resulted in similar yields of 2 (Table 1). A catalytic amount
of TfOH (5 mol %) did result in the production of 2, albeit
only in 16% yield. These results suggest that ruthenium plays
an important role in the hydroarylation process, and prompted
us to explore both the efficiency and scope of this Ru(III)
catalyst in the hydroarylation of arene-ene substrates.
The utility of RuCl3/AgOTf for the cyclization of a variety
of arene-ene substrates is shown in Table 2. This method
demonstrated good compatibility with various functional
groups, including halide, methoxy, free phenol, and protected
amines (Table 2). In addition to the desired chromane
products, homoallylic aryl ether substrates produced small
quantities of dihydrobenzofuran products, which likely form
through a sequential isomerization, Clasien rearrangement,
In an attempt to increase the electrophilicity at the metal
centers, reactions were run in the presence of silver salt
additives (AgX, where X ) SbF6, OTf, BF4). As a general
trend, it was found that the conversion of 1 increased upon
the addition of silver salts, implying that more reactive
catalysts were generated in situ. However, the increased
reactivity of the metal did not always translate into better
yields of the desired product 2 but rather to increased
amounts of undesired products (see Supporting Information).
In the case of PtCl4 and HfCl4, the addition of AgOTf had
only a marginal effect, resulting in 2 and 5% increases in
the yield of 2, respectively (Table 1).
We were delighted to identify an exciting lead, which
unambiguously stood out in the array of experiments.
Remarkably, the combination of RuCl3‚xH2O/AgOTf pro-
duced 2 in 83% yield.5 In addition to RuCl3, the hydrates of
IrCl4 and RhCl3 were also able to promote the formation of
(4) For representative examples, see: (a) Lail, M.; Arrowood, B. N.;
Gunnoe, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7506-7507. (b) Matsumoto,
T.; Periana, R. A.; Taube, D. J.; Yoshida, H. J. Mol. Catal. A 2002, 180,
1-18. (c) Ritleng, V.; Sirlin, C.; Pfeffer, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1731-
1769 and references therein. (d) Paras, N. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7894-7895 and references therein. (e) Jensen, K.
B.; Thorhauge, J.; Hazell, R. G.; Jorgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 160-163.
(5) For some examples of C-C bond formation reactions involving
RuCl3, see: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Voigtla¨nder, D.; Schrader, W.; Giebel, D.;
Reetz, M. T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 417-420. (b) Weissman, H.; Sing, X.;
Milstein, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 337-338. (c) Tsou, D. T.;
Burrington, J. D.; Maher, E. A.; Grasselli, R. K. J. Mol. Catal. 1985, 30,
219-222. (d) Rhone-Poulenc. Netherlands Patent 6603115/1966.
582
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 2004