ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Letter
pure 6′-diastereomers 1, 4, and 5, the data in Table 1 shows
that 4 and 5 are 1.8-fold and 15.3-fold poorer inhibitors of
prokaryotic translation than the parent compound 1 (IC50
In summary, the recently solved X-ray crystal structure of
eukaryotic ribosome in complex with the aminoglycoside
G418 provided, for the first time, a clear picture of differences
Pro
8
values of 6.0, 11.0, and 91.9 μM for 1, 4, and 5, respectively).
The scenario in eukaryotic translation is, however, different:
between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic sites, which was
exploited here for the rational design of new compounds that
selectively target the eukaryotic cytoplasmic rRNA A site, a key
target for PTC suppression activity. Using this tool, we
discovered a new pharmacophore, 7′-hydroxyl group, as a
valuable structural element of the glucosamine ring (ring I) that
significantly affects eukaryotic versus prokaryotic selectivity and
the subsequent PTC suppression activity. In addition, the
observed data support the feasibility of using the rational design
strategy employed here for the construction of new AG
derivatives that may act as drug for the treatment of PTC
underlined genetic disorders.
compound 4 is 2.9-fold more potent inhibitor than its parent 1
Euk
0
(
IC5 values of 120.5 and 347.1 μM, respectively), which is
further supported by the observed elevated PTC suppression
activity of 4 in comparison to that of 1 (Figure 3).
The observed differential selectivity of 4 can be explained by
the differences between its putative binding sites in eukaryotic
versus prokaryotic ribosome. A brief comparison between the
secondary structures of A sites in Figure 5A clearly shows that
while the bacterial A site is largely closed between the two C
G Watson−Crick base pairs, the eukaryotic A site is more open
due to unpaired C1409 and A1491 (E. coli numbering),
allowing higher flexibility of the eukaryotic decoding center at
this region. The two major bases that differ between bacteria
and eukaryotes are at positions 1408 and 1491: A1408 and
G1491 in bacteria; and G1408 and A1491 in eukaryotes (Figure
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
■
*
S
5
A). These differences make AGs potent antibiotics being
highly selective toward the bacterial versus the eukaryotic
ribosomes. For example, the data in Table 1 show that G418 is
Biochemical assays and synthetic procedures, assignment
of absolute configuration at 6′-position in 4 and 5, and
copies of NMR spectra (PDF)
225-fold more selective toward the prokaryotic versus the
eukaryotic ribosome. The interactions of AGs ring I with the
rRNA target sites have been suggested to contribute
2
0
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
significantly to the observed selectivity of AGs. Super-
■
8
imposition of the G418−Yeast structure with the crystal
20
structure of G418 bound to the bacterial A site (G418−Bact)
indicates that the overall conformation of the binding site upon
G418 binding in both structures is relatively similar (r.m.s.d.
values of 1.5 Å, Figure 5B), yet there are significant differences
in ligand−host interactions. Due to the lack of a strong
C1409G1491 Watson−Crick pairing that is present in
G418−Bact structure, the A1491 in G418−Yeast structure is
significantly shifted down toward the deep/major groove and
moves all the ligand molecule to the same direction. This makes
G418 relatively poorly bound in eukaryotic versus prokaryotic
target site as it is highlighted only for its ring I in Figure 5C.
Funding
This work was supported by Eloxx Pharmaceutical LTD
Research Fund (Grant No. 2019230).
Notes
The authors declare the following competing financial
interest(s): T.B. declares that the compounds 2, 3, 6, and 7
discussed in this publication are subject to license agreement
granted to a commercial third party.
20
In the bacterial A-site (Figure 5C, green) ring I forms a
pseudo base pair with A1408, by forming two hydrogen bonds
involving the ring oxygen and the 6′-OH group. These
interactions position the pyranose ring hydrogens in C−H···π
stacking with G1491, whereas two other hydroxyls on the
opposite side of the ring I, 3′-OH and 4′-OH, make H-bonds
with the phosphate oxygen atoms. The chiral (R)-6′-Me points
in the middle of the G1491C1409 pair, thus providing some
additional hydrophobic stabilization of ring-I. Because of such
compact interactions of ring I in the bacterial A-site, the
modifications at 6′-position could affect negatively to the
binding and to the subsequent biological activity as it is
observed for the compounds 4 and 5 (Table 1). In the G418−
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
N.M.S. thanks the Fine Postdoctoral Fellowship at the
Technion. V.B. acknowledges the Ministry of Science and
Technology, Israel (Kamea Program).
ABBREVIATIONS
■
AG, aminoglycoside; PTC, premature termination codon; CF,
cystic fibrosis; DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; USH,
Usher syndrome; MPS I−H, mucopolysaccharidosis type I−H
REFERENCES
■
(
1) Keeling, K. M.; Bedwell, D. M. Pharmacological suppression of
premature stop mutations that cause genetic diseases. Curr.
8
Yeast structure (Figure 5C, magenta), however, the ring I of
G418 forms fewer contacts and is very poorly bound. Instead of
a pseudo base pair presented in bacterial A site, only one H-
bond between N1 of G1408 and O6′ of ring I is formed. In the
opposite site of ring I, only O4′ makes H-bond contact with the
phosphate oxygen atom. The chiral (R)-6′-Me is relatively far
from the C1409 and makes this position prone for the
modifications; addition of an extra hydroxyl (7′-OH), while
keeping the same absolute configuration at 6′-postion
Pharmacogenomics 2005, 3, 259−269.
(
2) Zingman, L. V.; Park, S.; Olson, T. M.; Alekseev, A. E.; Terzic, A.
Aminoglycoside-induced translational read-through in disease: over-
coming nonsense mutations by pharmacogenetic therapy. Clin.
Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 81, 99−103.
(
3) Keeling, K. M.; Xue, X.; Gunn, G.; Bedwell, D. M. Therapeutics
Based on Stop Codon Readthrough. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.
014, 15, 371−394.
4) Shalev, M.; Baasov, T. When proteins start to make sense: fine-
2
(
(compound 4, Table 1), resulted in significant increase in the
tuning of aminoglycosides for PTC suppression therapy. MedChem-
observed biological activity.
Comm 2014, 5, 1092−1105.
E
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX