Inorganic Chemistry
Article
7.75 (m, 6H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.33
(t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.14−2.06 (m, 8H), 1.00−0.57 (m, 60H).
Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for C76H92N2: C, 88.32; H, 8.97; N,
2.71. Found: C, 88.64; H, 8.60; N, 2.92.
photolysis spectrometer. The third harmonic output (355 nm) of a
Nd:YAG laser (Quantel Brilliant, pulse width = 4.1 ns, repetition rate
= 1 Hz) was used as the excitation source. Each sample was purged
with argon for 45 min prior to measurement.
L2: Hexane/ethyl acetate (100/1, v/v) was used as the eluent to
The singlet depletion method35 was used to determine the triplet
excited-state molar extinction coefficients (εT1−Tn) at the TA band
maximum. After the εT1−Tn value was obtained, the triplet excited-state
quantum yield was calculated by the relative actinometry36 in which
SiNc in benzene was used as the reference (ε590 = 70 000 M−1 cm−1,
ΦT = 0.20).37
1
obtain 97 mg of a yellow powder (yield: 40%). H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.97 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.45 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.38−8.33
(m, 6H), 8.15 (s, 2H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.95 (d, J = 7.8 Hz,
2H), 7.90−7.83 (m, 6H), 2.24−2.13 (m, 8H), 0.92−0.70 (m, 32H),
0.68−0.55 (m, 28H). Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for C76H90N4O4·
0.6CH2Cl2: C, 78.33; H, 7.83; N, 4.77. Found: C, 78.01; H, 7.73; N,
4.94.
Computational Methods. All calculations, including ground state
geometry optimization and excited state calculations, were performed
using Gaussian 09 software package.38 The ideal octahedral geometries
of complexes 1−3 were optimized in their singlet and triplet spin
configurations by DFT using hybrid Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof
functional (PBE1PBE)39−41 and LANL2DZ basis set42−44 assigned for
Ir(III) ion and 6-31g* basis set45−49 for all the remaining atoms. All
calculations were done in dichloromethane solvent within the
conductor-like polarizable continuous model (CPCM).50,51 To reduce
the computational cost, the 2-ethylhexyl substituents on the fluorenes
were reduced to methyl groups. This change does not affect the
electronic levels contributing to absorption and emission in the visible
spectral range.
Absorption spectra of ligands L1−L3 and complexes 1−3 were
obtained using TDDFT52,53 utilizing the same functional and basis set
used in the ground state calculations. To obtain the spectrum, the
lowest 60 optical transitions were calculated and broadened by a
Gaussian distribution with the line width of 0.1 eV, corresponding to
the thermal broadening of the experimental spectra. Although the
calculated absorption spectra qualitatively agree with the experimental
ones, they are systematically red-shifted (see Figure S7 in the
percentage of Hartree−Fock (HF) exchange in the PBE1PBE
functional was increased from 25 to 40%. It is well-known that the
portion of the orbital exchange used in the density functional changes
the optical gap, i.e., the larger the HF exchange portion, the larger the
energy gap. However, the spectral features remain nearly the same,
independent of the hybrid functionals.54 Such a tunability of
functionals allows for matching the calculated and experimental
spectra better. The calculated spectra with 32% HF were found to
match the experimental spectra the best.
Calculations of the emission energies were carried out using
analytical TDDFT gradients55,56 by optimizing either the lowest
singlet (fluorescence) or triplet (phosphorescence) state as
implemented in the Gaussian09 software. The same functional, basis
set, and solvent model used for the ground state TDDFT calculations
were used for the emission calculations as well. For optimization of the
excited state, we started with several different initial guesses for the
wave function, choosing either the very lowest triplet state (root = 1)
or the second lowest triplet state (root = 2). Both guessing states were
initially taken at the ground state geometry with the triplet spin
configuration, where their electronic wave functions were calculated by
regular TDDFT procedure. By starting with different initial wave
functions, we were able to converge to the triplet states that are in a
better agreement with experimental emission energies.
The nature of optical transitions was classified based on analysis of
natural transition orbitals (NTOs)57 implemented in Gaussian09
software. NTOs redistribute the electron density obtained from the
transition density matrix for the hole (occupied) and electron
(unoccupied) while presenting many-body excited states. To visualize
these NTOs, the isosurface of 0.02 was used to obtain a better
representation of excited orbitals.
L3: Hexane/ethyl acetate (98/2, v/v) was used as the eluent to
afford a yellow oil that slowly became solidified into a yellow solid (48
1
mg, yield: 33%). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.93 (d, J = 8.6 Hz,
2H), 8.42 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.11−8.09 (m,
4H), 7.78−7.74 (m, 6H), 7.68−7.65 (m, 2H), 7.30−7.26 (m, 8H),
7.18−7.11 (m, 12H), 7.05−7.02 (m, 4H), 2.12−1.87 (m, 8H), 1.28−
0.82 (m, 40H), 0.80−0.63 (m, 20H). Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for
C100H110F6N4·3.5CH2Cl2: C, 74.65; H, 7.08; N, 3.36. Found: C, 74.95;
H, 6.79; N, 3.62.
General Synthetic Procedure for Complexes 1−3. To a stirred
solution of L1−L3 (0.078 mmol) and 10 (50 mg, 0.039 mmol) in
degassed CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and methanol (15 mL) was added
AgSO3CF3 (20 mg, 0.078 mmol). The mixture was refluxed overnight
under nitrogen. After being cooled to RT, 10-fold NH4PF6 was added.
The suspension was stirred at RT for 2 h. After removal of the solvent,
the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography.
Complex 1. CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (50/1, v/v) was used as the
eluent to afford a red solid (65 mg, yield: 50%). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.90−8.84 (m, 4H), 8.73 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.1
Hz, 2H), 8.07 (s, 2H), 7.92−7.73 (m, 14H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.55 (d, J =
7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.42−7.32 (m, 10H), 7.14−7.12 (m, 2H), 6.93 (t, J = 7.5
Hz, 2H), 6.52 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.07−2.04 (m, 8H), 0.93−0.89 (m,
60H). ESI-HRMS (m/z): calcd for [C106H112IrN4]+, 1633.8529;
found, 1633.8558. Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for C106H112F6IrN4P:
C, 71.56; H, 6.34; N, 3.15. Found: C, 71.26; H, 6.32; N, 3.01.
Complex 2. CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (50/1, v/v) was used as the
eluent to afford a red solid (61 mg, yield: 45%). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.92−8.85 (m, 4H), 8.77 (dd, J = 8.6 and 3.5 Hz, 2H),
8.33−8.26 (m, 6H), 8.11 (s, 2H), 7.95−7.81 (m, 8H), 7.80−7.72 (m,
6H), 7.71−7.66 (m, 4H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 6.5 Hz,
2H), 7.17−7.12 (m, 2H), 6.94 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz,
2H), 2.14−2.07 (m, 8H), 0.92−0.66 (m, 40H), 0.55−0.45 (m, 20H).
ESI-HRMS (m/z): calcd for [C106H110IrN6O4]+, 1723.8230; found,
1723.8232. Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for C106H110F6IrN6O4P: C,
68.11; H, 5.93; N, 4.50. Found: C, 67.95; H, 5.67; N, 4.58.
Complex 3. Purified by column chromatography twice (CH2Cl2/
ethyl acetate = 20/1, v/v) to afford a red solid (23 mg, yield: 25%). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.86 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 4H), 8.71 (d, J = 8.1
Hz, 2H), 8.25 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.92−7.52 (m, 20H),
7.39 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.32−7.25 (m, 10H), 7.13−6.91 (m, 18H),
6.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.04−1.29 (m, 8H), 0.97−0.54 (m, 60H).
ESI-HRMS (m/z): calcd for [C130H130IrN6]+, 1967.9986; found,
1967.9932. Elemental Analysis Calcd (%) for C130H130F6IrN6P·
0.5CH2Cl2: C, 72.70; H, 6.12; N, 3.90. Found: C, 72.61; H, 6.13;
N, 3.81.
Photophysical Measurements. All of the solvents used for
photophysical studies were spectrophotometric grade and purchased
from Alfa Aesar Co. Ltd. A Shimadzu UV-2501 spectrophotometer
and an HORIBA Fluoro-Max 4 fluorometer/phosphorometer were
used to measure the UV−vis absorption spectra and emission spectra,
respectively, in different solvents. The emission quantum yields were
determined by the relative actinometry method32 in degassed solutions
in which a degassed CH3CN solution of [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 (Φem = 0.097,
λex = 436 nm)33 was used as the reference for 1−3 and a 1 N sulfuric
acid solution of quinine bisulfate (Φem = 0.546, λex = 347.5 nm)34 was
used as the reference for ligands L1−L3. The nanosecond transient
difference absorption (TA) spectra and decays were measured in
degassed toluene solutions on an Edinburgh LP920 laser flash
Nonlinear Transmission Experiment. The nonlinear trans-
mission experiments at 532 nm for complexes 1−3 were carried out
in toluene solutions in a 2 mm cuvette using 4.1 ns laser pulses. The
linear transmission of 1−3 in toluene was adjusted to 80% in the 2 mm
cuvette at 532 nm. A Quantel Brilliant ns laser with a repetition rate of
10 Hz was used as the light source. The experimental setup and details
were described previously.58,59 The beam radius at the focal point was
approximately 96 μm.
D
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX