Sß . Özdemir et al. / Reactive & Functional Polymers 71 (2011) 168–174
169
We report here the synthesis and electrochemical properties of
two newly designed donor–acceptor–donor type green electrochro-
mic polymers 5,8-bis(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-2-
(101 MHz, CDCl3) d 152.8, 147.0, 135.4, 134.5, 133.9, 130.8,
130.3, 129.1, 128.9, 128.4, 126.2, 125.4, 125.0, 124.8.
(
phenyl)-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline (P1) and 5,8-bis(2,3-dihydrothie-
no[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-2,3-di(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline
P2). Both polymers are green in their neutral states and revealed
2
.4. Synthesis of 5,8-bis(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-2-
(
phenyll)-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline (M1)
(
highlytransmissiveoxidizedstates. Effect ofpendant Fc unit onelec-
trochemical and spectral behavior of the resulting polymers by a
comparison between their Fc free counterparts were given in detail.
5
,8-Dibromo-2-phenyl-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline (240 mg, 0.438
mmol) and tributyl (2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-
stannane (1.393 g, 2.19 mmol) were dissolved in dry THF (100 mL).
The solution was purged with argon for 30 min. and PdCl
was added under argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at
00 °C under argon atmosphere for 18 h, cooled and concentrated
on the rotary evaporator. The residue was subjected to column
chromatography (silica gel, CHCl :hexane, 2:1) to afford a red solid
in 68.0% yield (198 mg, 0.295 mmol). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
.63 (d, 1H), 8.55 (d, 1H), 7.78–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.46 (dd, J = 8.0,
.0 Hz, 3H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 6.49 (s, 1H), 4.79–4.76 (m, 2H), 4.41 (dd,
J = 5.2, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 4.34–4.32 (m, 2H),
2 3 2
(PPh )
2
. Experimental
1
2.1. General
3
1
All chemicals and reagents were obtained from commercial
3
) d
sources and used without further purification. THF was dried over
sodium and benzophenone. 2-Hydroxy-2-phenyl-1-ferrocenyleth-
anone (3) [25], 2-hydroxy-1,2-di(naphthalen-2-yl)ethanone
8
3
.31 (dd, J = 3.7 Hz, 2H), 4.27 (dd, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 3.95 (s, 5H). 13
) d 151,9, 150,1, 141.4, 141.3, 140.3, 140.2,
C
(9) [25], 1-ferrocenyl-2-phenylethanedione (4) and 1,2-di(naph-
4
thalen-2-yl)ethane-1,2-dione (10) [25], 4,7-Dibromo-2,1,3-
benzothiadiazole [26], 3,6-Dibromo-1,2-phenylenediamine [27],
5
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl
3
1
1
7
37.5, 136.9, 135.9, 133.3, 133.1, 129.6, 128.9, 128.6, 128.0, 127.8,
27.7, 127.6, 127.5, 127.0, 126.6, 126.2, 113.4, 103.1, 102.7, 82.3,
1.8, 70.0, 64.9, 64.3.
,8-dibro-mo-2-phenyl-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline and 5,8-dibro-
mo-2,3-di-(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline [28], tributyl(2,3-dihy-
drothieno-[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)stannane [29] were synthesized
according to previously published procedures. 1H NMR and
13
C
2
2
.5. Synthesis of 5,8-bis(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)-
,3-di(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline (M2)
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Spectrospin Avance
DPX-400 Spectrometer with TMS as the internal standard and
3
CDCl as the solvent. All shifts were given in ppm. Electrochemical
5
,8-Dibromo-2,3-di(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline (400 mg, 0.74
studies were performed in a three-electrode cell consisting of an
indium tin oxide doped glass slide (ITO) as the working electrode,
platinum wire as the counter electrode, and Ag wire as the pseudo
reference electrode under ambient conditions using a Voltalab 50
potentiostat. HOMO–LUMO values were calculated taking the va-
lue of NHE as ꢀ4.75 eV vs vacuum. Cary 5000 UV–Vis spectropho-
tometer was used to perform the spectroelectrochemical studies of
polymers.
mmol) and tributyl (2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-
yl)stannane (2.35 g, 3,7 mmol) were dissolved in dry THF
130 mL). The solution was purged with argon for 30 min. and
PdCl (PPh was added under argon atmosphere. The mixture
was stirred at 100 °C under argon atmosphere for 18 h, cooled
(
2
3 2
)
and concentrated on the rotary evaporator. The residue was sub-
jected to column chromatography (silica gel, CHCl
to afford a red solid in 65.0% yield (318.48 mg, 0.48 mmol).
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) d 9.23–8.44 (m, 6H), 8.38–7.60 (m, 8H),
.59–7.39 (m, 2H), 6.51 (s, 2H), 4.35 (dd, J = 3.55, 4H), 4.25 (dd,
J = 3.78, 4H). C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl
40.6, 139.1, 137.4, 135.4, 134.3, 131.1, 129.01, 128.9, 125.9,
3
:hexane, 2:1)
1
H
3
2.2. Synthesis of 5,8-dibromo-2-phenyl-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline (11)
7
1
3
3
) d 148.9, 146.4, 141.4,
A solution of 3,6-dibromo-1,2-phenylenediamine (166 mg, 0.63
1
1
mmol) and 1-ferrocenyl-2-phenylethanedione (200 mg, 0.63
mmol) in EtOH (50 mL) was refluxed overnight with a catalytic
amount of p-toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA). The mixture was cooled
to 0 °C and concentrated on the rotary evaporator. The residue was
subjected to column chromatography (silica gel, hexane:EtOH,
25.1, 124.9, 124.3, 123.2, 112.1, 103.4, 65.0, 64.3.
3
. Results and discussions
1
(
7
2
1
1
0:1). Compound 11 was obtained as a purple solid in 73.0% yield
249 mg, 0.45 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
) d 7.79 (d, 1H),
.76 (d, 1H), 7.59–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.35 (m, 3H), 4.57–4.53 (m,
H), 4.28–4.25 (m, 2H), 3.91 (s, 5H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl
) d
56.3, 153.73, 139.7, 138.7, 138.3, 132.7, 131.8, 129.8, 129.3,
28.1, 123.8, 123.1, 96.1, 82.1, 71.6, 70.2, 70.2.
3
.1. Synthesis
3
The synthetic route to the monomers was outlined in Scheme 1.
-Hydroxy-2-phenyl-1-ferrocenylethanone (3) and 2-hydroxy-1,2-
3
2
di(naphthalen-2-yl)ethanone (9) were synthesized by benzoin
condensation of ferrocene carboxaldehyde (1) and b-naphtalde-
hyde (2, 8) [5]. Oxidation of 2-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1-ferrocenyleth-
2
.3. Synthesis of 5,8-dibromo-2,3-di(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline
anone (3) by MnO
a red solid with sufficient yields [25]. Oxidation of 2-hydroxy-
,2-di(naphthalen-2-yl)ethanone (9) took place and 1,2-di(naph-
thalen-2-yl)ethane-1,2-dione (10) was afforded via refluxing in
HNO . Bromination of 1,3-benzothiadiazole yielded dibrominated
compound 6 in high yield [26]. Then the reduction of this com-
pound by NaBH as described in the literature [27] gave desired
dibromodiamine 7. Condensation of 7 with diketones in ethanol
afforded 5,8-dibromo-2-phenyl-3-ferrocenylquinoxaline (11) and
5,8-dibromo-2,3-di(naphthalen-2-yl)quinoxaline (12) [28]. The
Stille coupling of these compounds with tributyl(2,3-dihydrothie-
no[3,4-b][1,4]dioxin-5-yl)stannane [29] gave the desired mono-
mers M1 and M2 (Scheme 1).
2
gave 1-ferrocenyl-2-phenylethanedione (4) as
(12)
1
A
solution of 3,6-dibromo-1,2-phenylenediamine (86 mg,
0
.33 mmol) and 1,2-di(naphthalen-2-yl)ethane-1,2-dione (100
3
mg, 0.322 mmol) in EtOH (25 mL) was refluxed overnight with a
catalytic amount of p-toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA). The mixture
was cooled to 0 °C. The precipitate was isolated by filtration and
washed with EtOH several times then the residue was subjected
4
to column chromatography (silica gel, CHCl
3
:hexane, 1:1) to get
the product as a yellow solid in 67% yield (116 mg, 0.214 mmol).
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) d 8.96–8.81 (m, 1H), 8.55–7.99 (m,
1
3
7
H), 7.95 (d, 2H), 7.92–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.56–7.46 (m, 2H). C NMR