Oxidation of Aryl Methyl Sulfoxides
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 7, 1999 2235
oxidant on the sulfur of the sulfoxide.1
9-26
However, a
single-electron transfer mechanism from the sulfoxide to
the metal ion in the rate-determining step has been
postulated in the Cr(VI),2
7,28
cytochrome P-450, and
29
tetrahexylammonium tetrakis(diperoxomolybdo)phos-
phate30 oxidations of substituted phenyl methyl sulfox-
ides. On the other hand, in the alkaline peroxobenzoic
3
1-33
acid and peroxide oxidation,
as well as in the fluo-
renone carbonyl oxide34 and permanganate ion oxida-
tion of sulfoxides, a nucleophilic attack of the oxidant on
the sulfoxide in the rate-determining step has been
suggested.
35
In the present study, the formation of the sulfone in
the absence of other oxygen sources (i.e., at inert atmo-
sphere and in non-aqueous solvent) undoubtedly estab-
lishes that the oxygen atom incorporated into the sulfone
is derived from the oxomanganese(V) ions. The results
obtained from the studies on influence of changes in the
electronic nature of the substrate and oxidant throw more
light on the mechanism of oxygen atom transfer. The
observed F value of -2.44 ( 0.60 is close to the F values
found for the oxidation of substituted phenyl methyl
1
9
sulfoxides by potassium bromate (F ) -2.05) and by
chloramine-T20 (F ) -2.02). These reactions were char-
acterized as proceeding through an electrophilic attack
by a halogen ion on the sulfur center of the sulfoxide in
2
2
the rate-determining step. In the dioxiranes, gem-
2
3
24
dialkylperoxonium ion, Cr(VI)-oxalic acid, peroxomono-
sulfate,25 and oxo(phosphine)ruthenium(IV) complexes
oxidation of substituted phenyl methyl sulfoxides, al-
though low F values of -0.76, -0.83, -0.93, -0.40, and
26
F igu r e 2. Plots of k
a) p-BrC SOMe with 2a , (b) MPSO with 2b, (c) MPSO with
e, (d) MPSO with 2a , (e) MPSO with 2c, (f) p-OMeC SOMe
with 2a , and (g) MPSO with 2d .
1
versus [sulfoxide] for the oxidation of
(
2
6 4
H
6 4
H
-
N
0.42, respectively, have been observed, an S 2 mecha-
nism has been postulated for all these reactions. In the
the salen ligand is that the oxidant has an extremely
electrophilic oxygen that has very little interaction with
the aromatic portion of the salen. This absence of
electronic communication could be due to weak M-O π
bonding or a weak π interaction between the salen oxygen
and the metal. The slope value (+0.24) obtained in the
present study, because the observed F value is high and
log k
2
values are better correlated with σ
p
, one may
anticipate a S
N
2 mechanism involving the rate-determin-
ing electrophilic attack of the oxidant on the sulfur of
the sulfoxide.
A clear picture of the mechanism of this reaction may
emerge by comparing the present results with those
p
E° versus Σσ plot (Figure 5) supports this postulation
regarding electronic interaction between ligand and
metal and suggests that regardless of oxidation state this
interaction is weak.17 It is interesting to compare the
present results with those observed for the oxidation of
(19) Srinivasan, C.; J egatheesan, P. P.; Arumugam, N. Indian J .
Chem. 1986, 25A, 678.
(20) Ganapathy, K.; J ayagandhi, P. Int. J . Chem. Kinet. 1983, 15,
1
1
129.
organic sulfides. The electronic effect is more pro-
nounced with sulfoxide oxidation and the F value is
uniformly higher with sulfoxides (Tables 2 and 3).
The effect on the reaction rate of introducing substit-
uents at the 7-position of the salen ligand of the oxoman-
ganese(V) complex was studied using 2a , 2e, and 2f for
the oxidation of methyl phenyl sulfoxide. The rate data
in Table 1 show that the presence of a methyl or phenyl
group at the 7-position slightly reduces the rate, as in
(
21) Srinivasan, C.; J egatheesan, P. P. Indian J . Chem. 1989, 28A,
50.
(22) Murray, R. W.; J eyaraman, R.; Krishna pillai, M. J . Org. Chem.
987, 52, 746.
23) Bloodworth, A. J .; Melvin, T.; Mitchell, J . C. J . Org. Chem. 1988,
2
1
5
(
3, 1078.
(24) Srinivasan, C.; J egatheesan, P. P.; Rajagopal, S.; Arumugam,
N. Can. J . Chem. 1987, 65, 2421.
25) Suthakaran, R.; Subramanian, P.; Srinivasan, C. Proc. Indian
(
Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci. 1986, 97, 555.
(26) Acquaye, J . H.; Muller, J . G.; Takeuchi, K. J . Inorg. Chem. 1993,
32, 160.
1
1
the case of sulfide oxidation. Thus, the steric effect
(
27) (a) Baliah, V.; Satyanarayana, P. V. V. Indian J . Chem. 1978,
A16, 966; (b) 1980, B19, 620.
28) Srinivasan, C.; Venkatasamy, R.; Rajagopal, S. Indian J . Chem.
981, 20A, 505.
29) Watanabe, Y.; Takashi, I.; Oae, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 533.
(30) Ballistreri, F. P.; Bazzo, A.; Tomaselli, G. A.; Toscano, R. M. J .
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 7074.
31) (a) Curci, R.; Modena, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963, 1749; 1965,
V
observed with Mn complexes is little, which is contrary
(
to the substantial steric effect noted in the oxo(salen)-
1
V
18
Cr complexes oxidation of alkynes.
(
Mech a n ism of Oxygen Atom Tr a n sfer fr om Oxo-
m a n ga n ese(V) to Su lfoxid es. Three types of mecha-
nisms have been proposed so far for the oxidation of
sulfoxides. Most of the reactions proceed by a mechanism
involving a rate-determining electrophilic attack of the
(
8
63. (b) Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 1227.
(32) (a) Curci, R.; Giovine, A.; Modena, G. Tetrahedron 1966, 22,
235. (b) Curci, R.; Di Furia, F.; Modena, G. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
1
Trans 2. 1977, 576.
33) Ogata, Y.; Suyama, S. Chem. Ind. 1971, 707.
(34) Sawaki, Y.; Kato, H.; Ogata, Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
3832.
(
(
17) The authors thank one of the referees for pointing out this
interesting aspect.
18) Righter, B.; Srihari, S.; Hunter, S.; Masnovi, J . J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 3918.
(
(35) Rajagopal, S.; Sivasubramaniam, G.; Suthakaran, R.; Srini-
vasan, C. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci. 1991, 103, 637.