1874
NAGIEVA
Sꢀmonoxides of thiophene derivatives as
π
ꢀexcessive a static system for a long time. We synthesized biomiꢀ
heteroaromatic compounds were, however, unsucꢀ metics of two types, which only differed in the valence
cessful. Under the conditions similar to those of the state of the iron ion. They were tested in synchronous
gas phase Nꢀoxidation of 4ꢀvinylpyridine with hydroꢀ oxidation of simple thiophene derivatives for the prepꢀ
gen peroxide, almost no Sꢀoxidation was observed; aration of thiopheneꢀ1ꢀmonoxide derivatives.
small amounts (~4%) of 3,4ꢀdimethylꢀ2,5ꢀdibroꢀ
The synthesis of catalytic biomimetics was perꢀ
mothiophene underwent oxidative destruction, and
formed as follows. NH OH was added to an aqueous
4
the decomposition of H O predominantly occurred
2
2
solution of Fe (SO ) (to prepare active centers conꢀ
2
4 3
in the reaction system.
We believe that ꢀdeficient heteroaromatic comꢀ The solution was filtered, and the precipitate was
pounds, such as pyridines, easily participate in various washed with hot water. The precipitate was then disꢀ
free radical reactions, whereas ꢀexcessive thiophenes solved in an aqueous solution of EDTA. The adsorpꢀ
3+
taining Fe ions) to completely precipitate Fe(OH)3
.
π
π
are stable toward free radical attacks. Bearing this in tion of this solution was performed by depositing it on
2+
mind, we changed our approach to performing synꢀ alumina. Catalysts with Fe in active centers was preꢀ
chronous oxidation by hydrogen peroxide from free pared by adding an aqueous solution of EDTA to an
radical to biomimetic catalytic. We had to synthesize a aqueous solution of FeSO4. The complex obtained was
biomimetic catalyst on which an oxidative intermediꢀ deposited on Al O3. The monosodium salt of the
2
3+
ate would form (as a result of the catalytic decomposiꢀ EDTA Fe complex was adsorbed from an aqueous
tion of H O ) with “active oxygen” electrophilic in solution on a certain amount of Al O3. Alumina was
2
2
2
character, because thiophenes, which are ꢀexcessive used in the neutral or basic form.
π
heteroaromatic compounds, easily participate in elecꢀ
trophilic interactions.
The experimental unit was a threeꢀneck flask with
a backflow condenser and a tap for gaseous products.
The flask was connected with a gasometer by a rubber
hose. A thermometer and a pipe for taking liquid samꢀ
ples were placed inside the flask. The unit was also
equipped with a stirrer and furnace for heating it.
In recent years, a new area of catalysis has been
intensely explored. This is the creation of newꢀgenerꢀ
ation catalysts, soꢀcalled biomimetics, which model
separate enzyme functions in usual chemical systems.
They differ by the method of synthesis of mimetics
themselves, their functions, and types of modeled bioꢀ
chemical oxidation reactions. One of successful oxiꢀ
The products were identified and quantitatively
estimated using gasꢀliquid and liquid chromatography,
1
3+
chromatoꢀmass spectrometry, and H NMR spectrosꢀ
dation models is РРFe OH (iron protoporphin)
deposited on alumina, which models catalase, peroxꢀ
ide, and monooxygenase reactions [3].
copy.
The substrates were thiophene derivatives 3,4ꢀ
A method for the perfection of these systems is the dibromothiophene, 2,5ꢀdimethylthiophene, and 3,4ꢀ
modification of the organic ligand of the redox center dibromoꢀ2,5ꢀdimethylthiophene. We used acetone,
or its replacement by simpler and more accessible methanol, and dichloromethane as solvents and
organic ligands with similar action. This was perꢀ hydrogen peroxide of “reaktivnyi” (reactive) grade as
3
+
formed for the РРFe OH/Al O biomimetic, in a solvent.
2
3
3
+
which the iron ion (Fe ) was coordinated with ethylꢀ
enediaminotetraacetic acid (EDTA) rather than proꢀ
toporphin [4]. The selection of EDTA as an organic
ligand was not fortuitous. For instance, the broadly
known Hamilton and Udenfried oxidative systems
contain diꢀ and trivalent iron linked with EDTA. An
analysis of the mechanism of enzymatic reactions with
the participation of hydrogen peroxide (catalase and
peroxidases) excluded reactions with radical chain
mechanisms, which have nothing in common with
enzymatic oxidation.
In all experiments, a substrate (0.1 g) dissolved in
one of the solvents was loaded into the static reactor,
and Perhydrol was added in the amount corresponding
to the S (substrate) : H O2(Perhydrol) = 1 : 1.5 or 2.0
2
ratio. This reaction mixture was heated to 50–55°С
,
the catalyst (0.1–0.15 g) was added to it, and the magꢀ
netic stirrer was switched on. At the first stage, the
reaction continued for ~5 h. After this, a sample was
taken and analyzed. The gasometer was used to moniꢀ
tor the rate of oxygen release. In ~5 h, the intensity of
oxygen release sharply decreased, which was evidence
In enzymatic catalysis, we observe concerted parꢀ of a low concentration of H O2. During this time, the
2
ticipation of catalytic redox and acidꢀbase centers in catalyst became active in the main. Product yields
selective oxidation. A new inorganic biomimetic (catꢀ were easy to determine from the mass spectra. Next,
alyst) should contain acidꢀbase and redox catalytic H O2 in an amount 10 times larger than its initial
2
centers on the one hand and be able to perform oxidaꢀ amount was added to the system to create the most
tion by the mechanism of coherentꢀsynchronous reacꢀ favorable conditions for conjugated oxidation. The
tions on the other. In addition, in liquid phase oxidaꢀ reaction continued for more than a day. Samples for
tion with hydrogen peroxide, EDTA is much more staꢀ analyses were taken systematically to draw concluꢀ
ble to the destructive action of the oxidizer compared sions about the depth of transformations. The intenꢀ
with porphin. This allows oxidation to be performed in sity of oxygen release was monitored using the gasoꢀ
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Vol. 83
No. 11
2009