ChemComm
Communication
the imidazolium moieties are involved in interacting with IP3 and pyrophosphates, AMP, ADP, ATP and IP3 did not induce any
IP6. The p-stacking distance between naphthoimidazolium moieties significant fluorescence change. The possible binding modes and
was shortened to 4.1 Å and 3.6 Å for 1 + IP3 and 1 + IP6, respectively. fluorescence changes are also explained by theoretical calculations.
In binding with IP6, the naphthoimidazolium moieties are closer to We further showed the first successful in vivo imaging of IP6 in cells
each other than in binding with IP3. In addition, the interplanar by using a relatively simple naphthoimidazolium-based fluorescent
dihedral angle (C1–N1–N2–C2) of 1 + IP3 is calculated to be 341 due to probe. By using this relatively simple receptor, we could obtain
the space for motions, while it remains almost stacked with the reasonable selectivity for IP6 in 100% aqueous solution at pH 7.4.
dihedral angle of 41 in 1 + IP6 due to the limited space as a result of
This research was financially supported by a grant from the
the strong interactions with six phosphates. This structural feature is National Creative Research Initiative programs of the National
consistent with NMR experimental data, and responsible for the Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean
stronger fluorescence of 1 in binding with IP6 than IP3.
government (MSIP) (No. 2012R1A3A2048814). The work at the
To investigate the fluorescence properties of the receptor Sungkyunkwan University was supported by the NRF grant
upon addition of IP6, TDDFT calculations were performed. The (2007-0056343) funded by MEST. JYL acknowledges the support
important orbital transitions to the excitation and the corres- from KISTI supercomputing center through the strategic support
ponding orbital shapes are shown in Fig. S8 (ESI†). The major program for the supercomputing application research (No. KSC-
transition of 1 comes from HOMO - LUMO + 3 and HOMO À 1 - 2013-C2-027).
LUMO + 2 transitions. Though these orbitals are localized in four
naphthoimidazolium groups, the on-site transition is likely to be
dominated considering the weak fluorescence observed in the
Notes and references
1 M. J. Berridge, Nature, 1993, 361, 315.
experiment. Whereas in 1 + IP6, HOMO À 3 - LUMO + 8 and
HOMO À 4 - LUMO + 6 transitions occur where the electrons in
one naphthoimidazolium group might interact with holes in
another one resulting in excimer emission.
2 V. Raboy, Phytochemistry, 2003, 64, 1033.
3 E. Vasca, S. Materazzi, T. Caruso, O. Milano, C. Fontanella and
C. Manfredi, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2002, 374, 173.
4 U. Schlemmer, W. Frølich, R. M. Prieto and F. Grases, Mol. Nutr.
Food Res., 2009, 53, S330.
5 (a) L. A. Hanakahi, M. Bartlet-Jones, C. Chappell and D. Pappin, Cell,
2000, 102, 721; (b) J. D. York, A. R. Odom, R. Murphy, E. B. Ives and
S. R. Wente, Science, 1999, 285, 96; (c) S. B. Shears, Cell. Signalling,
2001, 13, 151.
Finally, probe 1 was further applied for live cell imaging.
Fluorescence images of labeled HeLa cells (adenocarcinoma)
and WI38 VA-13 subclone 2RA cells (normal) are shown in Fig. 6
and Fig. S9 (ESI†). Faint fluorescence is observed in the labeled
cells; however, incubation with phytic acid (5 and 50 mM)
induced strong fluorescence (Fig. 6). Probe 1 successfully
passed through the live cell membrane and was possibly
distributed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of cells. To identify the
cytotoxic effect of 1, HeLa cells were seeded in a 24-well plate. The
cells were incubated with 0, 1, 5, and 50 mM 1 for 24 h at 37 1C, and
cell viability was determined by counting live cells. When the cells
were treated with 1 at a concentration of 50 mM, cell viability
was more than 99% compared to those without probe 1 treatment
(Fig. S10, ESI†). These results indicated that 1 is nontoxic and may
play a role as a bio-probe for intracellular phytic acid, which has
very useful applications in bioimaging assays.
6 A. J. Koning, Analyst, 1994, 119, 1319.
´
´
7 B. M. Simonet, A. Rıos, F. Grases and M. Valcarcel, Electrophoresis,
2003, 24, 2092.
8 J. G. March, B. M. Simonet and F. Grases, J. Chromatogr., B: Biomed.
Appl., 2001, 757, 247.
9 (a) L. A. Joyce, S. H. Shabbir and E. V. Anslyn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010,
39, 3621; (b) P. Sokkalingam, D. S. Kim, H. Hwang, J. L. Sessler and
C.-H. Lee, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 1819; (c) E. Galbraith and T. D. James,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3831; (d) M. E. Jun, B. Roy and K. H. Ahn,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7583.
10 (a) K. Nikura and E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8533;
(b) S. Aoki, M. Zulkefeli, M. Shiro, M. Kohsako, K. Takeda and
E. Kimura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9129; (c) D. J. Oh and
K. H. Ahn, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3539; (d) J. Y. Jung, E. J. Jun, Y.-U.
Kwon and J. Yoon, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7928; (e) T. Morii,
K. Sugimoto, K. Makino, M. Otsuka, K. Imoto and Y. Mori, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1138; ( f ) K. Sugimoto, M. Nishida, M. Otsuka,
K. Makino, K. Ohkubo, Y. Moro and T. Morii, Chem. Biol., 2004,
11, 475.
In conclusion, we report a new tetranaphthoimidazolium
receptor 1 as the fluorescent chemosensor for phytate, myo- 11 (a) H. Irth, M. Lamoree, G. J. de Jong, U. A. Th. Brinkman and
R. W. Frei, J. Chromatogr. A, 1990, 499, 617; (b) Y. Chen, J. Chen,
K. Ma, S. Cao and X. Chen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2007, 605, 185.
12 D. J. Oh, M. S. Han and K. H. Ahn, Supramol. Chem., 2007, 19, 315.
inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6), in 100% aqueous solution at
pH 7.4. The fluorescent receptor 1 displayed a selective fluorescence
enhancement with IP6. The other simple anions, phosphates, 13 T. Minami and Y. Kubo, Chem. – Asian J., 2010, 5, 605.
14 S. Kim, M. S. Eom, S. H. Seo and M. S. Han, Tetrahedron Lett., 2013,
54, 5284.
15 (a) Z. Xu, N. J. Singh, J. Lim, J. Pan, H. N. Kim, S. Park, K. S. Kim and
J. Yoon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15528; (b) V. Amendola,
M. Boiocchi, B. Colasson, L. Fabbrizzi, M. J. Rodriguez Douton
and F. Ugozzoli, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 6920; (c) Q.-S. Lu,
L. Dong, J. Zhang, J. Li, L. Jiang, Y. Huang, S. Qin, C.-W. Hu and
X.-Q. Yu, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 669; (d) C. Coll, R. Casasu´s, E. Aznar,
´
´˜
´
M. D. Marcos, R. Martınez-Manez, F. Sancenon, J. Soto and
´
P. Amoros, Chem. Commun., 2007, 1957.
16 N. R. Song, J. H. Moon, E. J. Jun, J. Choi, Y. Kim, S.-J. Kim, J. Y. Lee
and J. Yoon, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 1765.
17 Z. Xu, S. K. Kim, S. J. Han, C. Lee, G. Kociok-Kohn, T. D. James and
J. Yoon, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 3058.
18 M. J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford, CT, 2009.
Fig. 6 Confocal fluorescence images of 1 in HeLa cells. (a) No 1 (b) 30 mM
1 after 30 min. (c) 30 mM 1, 5 mM phytic acid (IP6) after 30 min. (d) 30 mM 1,
50 mM phytic acid (IP6) after 30 min. Lower images: bright field. ex 405/em
BP 420–480 nm, scale bar: 10 mm.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5851--5853 | 5853