J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 120, No. 24, 22 June 2004
The photo-Fries rearrangement
11639
the signal. Our attempts to see a change of the dissociation
rate with varying excitation wavelength did not yet provide
any significant evidence.
implementing the continuum setup. They gratefully acknowl-
edge funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
After the barrier crossing the molecular system evolves
on the potential energy surface of the * state to the coni-
cal intersection ͑see Fig. 6͒. There about half of the popula-
1
tion is transferred to the original S state and returns to the
D. Bellu sˇ , Adv. Photochem. 8, 109 ͑1971͒.
0
2
M. A. Miranda and F. Galindo, in CRC Handbook of Organic Photochem-
istry and Photobiologiy, 2nd ed., edited by W. Horspool and F. Lenci
reactant minimum. The rest of the population reaches the
potential well of the separated radical pair. The cyclohexadi-
one intermediate is formed subsequently by the recombina-
tion of the radicals in ortho geometry. CIDNP studies on
͑
CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004͒, p. 41–1.
3
4
5
6
J. C. Anderson and C. B. Reese, Proc. Chem. Soc. 1960, 217 ͑1960͒.
H. Kobsa, J. Org. Chem. 27, 2293 ͑1962͒.
P. Mangus and C. Lescop, Tetrahedron Lett. 42, 7193 ͑2001͒.
Lignins, edited by K. V. Sarkanen and C. H. Ludwig ͑Wiley, New York,
1
-naphtyl acetate indicate that recombination of the radicals
1
4
to the original compound is of minor importance and
thereby support the idea that the quantum yield is indeed
given by the dynamics at the conical intersection. The effi-
cient product formation and short recombination time of 13
ps indicate that the radicals cannot escape from the solvent
cage and propably stay in contact almost all the time.
1971͒.
7
8
9
0
D. Bellu sˇ and P. Hrdlovi cˇ , Chem. Rev. 67, 599 ͑1967͒.
M. R. Sandner and D. J. Trecker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 5725 ͑1967͒.
J. W. Meyer and G. S. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 2187 ͑1970͒.
C. E. Kalmus and D. M. Hercules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 449 ͑1974͒.
S. M. Beck and L. E. Brus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 1805 ͑1982͒.
R. Nakagaki, M. Hiramatsu, T. Watanabe, Y. Tanimoto, and S. Nagakura,
J. Phys. Chem. 89, 3222 ͑1985͒.
T. Arai, S. Tobita, and H. Shizuka, Chem. Phys. Lett. 223, 521 ͑1994͒.
N. P. Gritsan, Y. P. Tsentalovich, A. V. Yurkovskaya, and R. Z. Sagdeev, J.
Phys. Chem. 100, 4448 ͑1996͒.
1
11
12
IV. CONCLUSIONS
13
14
Our time resolved absorption measurements on BPA pro-
vide strong evidence that after photoexcitation the S state is
15
1
I. F. Molokov, Y. P. Tsentalovich, A. V. Yurkovskaya, and R. Z. Sagdeev,
J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 110, 159 ͑1997͒.
W. Adam, J. A. de Sanabia, and H. Fischer, J. Org. Chem. 38, 2571
Ϫ1
depopulated with a rate of 0.5 ps by a mechanism which
1
1
6
7
leads to the cleavage of the O–C bond and the generation of
a radical pair. The recombination of the radicals is found to
occur within 13 ps. It leads to the intermediate cyclohexadi-
enone product which transforms to the final product BOHA
on a time scale longer by far. This is the first direct observa-
tion of the primary steps of the photo-Fries rearrangement,
i.e., the formation and recombination of the radical pair. The
bond cleavage leading to the radicals seems to occur via a
͑
1973͒.
T. J. Stone and W. A. Waters, J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 213 ͑1964͒.
C. Cui, X. Wang, and R. G. Weiss, J. Org. Chem. 61, 1962 ͑1996͒.
A. Spiegel, T. Bach, T. Habeck, and F. Prechtl, J. Inf. Recording 25, 355
18
19
͑
2000͒.
B. S. Ross, M. Finkelstein, and R. C. Petersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84,
139 ͑1964͒.
20
4
21
T. Wilhelm, J. Piel, and E. Riedle, Opt. Lett. 22, 1494 ͑1997͒.
22
E. Riedle, M. Beutter, S. Lochbrunner, J. Piel, S. Schenkl, S. Sporlein, and
W. Zinth, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 71, 457 ͑2000͒.
¨
* state which forms an avoided crossing with the optically
23
A. J. Wurzer, S. Lochbrunner, and E. Riedle, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt.
excited * state along a coordinate associated with the
lengthening of the O–C bond.
71, 405 ͑2000͒.
24
For a review, see J. M. Hollas, High Resolution Spectroscopy ͑Wiley,
Chichester, 1998͒, p. 385.
In molecules exhibiting excited state intramolecular pro-
ton transfer we found indications for a similar mechanism for
the subsequent internal conversion.3 A deformation of the
reaction center leads to an avoided crossing between the op-
tically accessible * state and a * state which forms
then a conical intersection with the electronic ground state.
The interplay of the three electronic states causes a very
efficient electronic relaxation route to the ground state. We
think that analogous to this situation and the photo-Fries re-
action the transition between two different electronic states is
often governed by the coupling to a third state like for ex-
ample a * state which mediates the process. In this case
the energy gap between the originally excited state and the
ground state is of secondary importance and does not directly
determine the relaxation rate. Rather it is determined by the
shape of the potential energy surfaces, the resulting avoided
crossing and finally the accessibility of the conical
intersection.
25
J. Catal a´ n, F. Toribio, and A. U. Acu
˜
na, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 303 ͑1982͒.
S. Nagaoka, N. Hirota, M. Sumitani, and K. Yoshihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
05, 4220 ͑1983͒.
9,40
26
1
2
2
2
7
8
9
H. J. Jaffe and M. Orchin, Theory and Applications of Ultraviolett Spec-
troscopy ͑Wiley, New York, 1962͒, Chap. 12.
A. Migus, Y. Gauduel, J. L. Martin, and A. Antonetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58,
1559 ͑1987͒.
J. A. Kloepfer, V. H. Vilchiz, V. A. Lenchenkov, A. C. Germaine, and S. E.
Bradforth, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6288 ͑2000͒.
C. D. Cook, J. Org. Chem. 18, 261 ͑1953͒.
C. D. Cook and B. E. Norcross, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 1176 ͑1959͒.
R. Hermann, S. Naumov, G. R. Mahalaxmi, and O. Brede, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 324, 265 ͑2000͒.
30
31
32
33
H. Adachi, N. Basco, and D. G. L. James, Chem. Phys. Lett. 59, 502
͑
1978͒.
34
M. M. Maricq and J. J. Szente, Chem. Phys. Lett. 253, 333 ͑1996͒.
A. L. Sobolewski and W. Domcke, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9275 ͑2001͒.
A. L. Sobolewski, W. Domcke, C. Dedonder-Lardeux, and C. Jouvet,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 1093 ͑2002͒.
W. Fuß, K.-L. Kompa, S. Lochbrunner, A. M. M u¨ ller, T. Schikarski, W. E.
Schmid, and S. A. Trushin, Chem. Phys. 232, 161 ͑1998͒.
S. Grimme, Chem. Phys. 163, 313 ͑1992͒.
3
3
5
6
37
3
3
8
9
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
K. Stock, T. Bizjak, and S. Lochbrunner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 354, 409
͑
2002͒.
The authors thank Tanja Bizjak for performing the con-
tinuum probe measurements and Vincent De Waele for
40
S. Lochbrunner and E. Riedle, Recent Res. Devel. Chem. Physics 4, 31
͑2003͒.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
37.207.120.173 On: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:09:50
1