Enolization of Aldehydes and Ketones
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 10, 1998 2295
and ionic strengths were maintained at 2.0 M by the addition
of the appropriate quantity of potassium nitrate. The rates of
enolization of the aldehydes and ketones were measured using
the iodine trap method which depends on a rapid and irreversible
[ketone or aldehyde]) is related to the Taft σ* values (eq 6),
where ∆ is the number of aldehydic hydrogens. This predicts
that the percentage of hydration of 3-chloropropanal (3) should
be 75%. Although the percentage hydration of acetone (8)
-
14g
7b
trapping of the enol form by I2/I3 . The concentration of I2/
(0.2%) and cyclopentanone (13) (0.2%) reported in water
at 25 °C is small, a value of 7.4% has been reported for
-
11
I3 was measured at an isosbestic point (351 nm) where ꢀ )
4
7b
(
2.6 ( 0.1) × 10 by using the equilibrium constant for triiodide
cyclohexanone. No correction was made to take account of
-
1 5f
formation appropriate to µ ) 2.0 (630 M ). The carbonyl
the small amount of hydrate in the case of ketones. This
approximation does not appreciably change the correlations
observed, since concentration appears in both coordinates.
2
3
compounds were used in a 10 -10 )-fold excess. Under these
conditions reversal of iodination is negligible12 and iodine,
unlike bromine or chlorine at low pH, does not induce oxidation
h
2
c,13
of the aldehyde.
The zero-order rate of iodine uptake was
pK ) 1.70Σσ* + 2.03∆ - 2.81
(6)
measured in deoxygenated solutions and was reproducible under
these conditions. The individual rate constants were obtained
from buffer dilution curves, typically covering 12 buffer
dilutions over the range 0.01 to 2.0 M total buffer concentration.
However, due to the dominance of the base-catalyzed and the
third-order terms in the ionization of aldehydes, the kA values
were not obtained with the same precision and are accurate only
to (20%. Plots of absorbance against time were linear in each
case from 10 s after mixing to at least 90% iodine consumption.
Independent experiments showed that the observed rate was
independent of the initial iodine concentration and was propor-
tional to the ketone or aldehyde concentrations. The observed
rate constants (see eq 4) were obtained with eq 5, where dA/dt
is the rate of change of absorbance at 351 nm, where iodide
was maintained in a constant large excess.
All the aldehydes were distilled under nitrogen and used fresh.
As has been noted, acetaldehyde (1) in particular causes
experimental difficulties if not pure, due to the formation of
2
c
oligomers, such as a cyclic trimer. It was found that when
the rate of iodine uptake was measured in air there was an initial
rapid generation of iodine when the aldehyde was added. This
was most marked with acetaldehyde (1), but decreased with
increasing chain length. This initial increase in absorption could
be eliminated by following the rates of reaction in sealed
cuvettes using solutions which had been flushed with oxygen
free nitrogen. There was a residual initial small increase in the
case of acetaldehyde, but the experimental pseudo-zero-order
rate constant was not affected by this.
In acetic acid buffer solutions the observed first-order rate
constants can be written as in eq 3. Since Ka is the acidity
constant for the ionizaton of the acid, this can be rewritten as
d[I ]/dt ) kobs[ketone]
(4)
(5)
2
-
+
eq 7, or eq 8 where r is the buffer ratio [AH]/[A ] ) [H ]/
Ka. This is a quadratic curve and kAB was obtained by using a
least-squares computer program, using the values of kA and kB
from the initial linear portion of the buffer dilution plots, where
the contribution of the kAB term is negligible.
-
kobs ) 1/[ketone]ꢀI3
-
{1 + (1/KI3 [I ])} dA/dt
-
The concentration of free aldehyde in solution was obtained
by correcting for the hydrate, measuring aldehyde/hydrate ratios
in 2.0 M aqueous KNO3 as follows: acetaldehyde (1), 45%
hydrate; propanal (2), 41.5% (H2O), 44.7% (D2O); 3-chloro-
propanal (3), 80%; 2-methylpropanal (4), 33.3%; and butanal
+
-
-
+
- 2
kobs ) k + k [H ][A ]/K + k [A ] + k [H ][A ] /K
a
o
A
a
B
AB
(7)
(
5), 31.5%. These values were obtained by integration of the
-
- 2
kobs ) k + {kA
o
•
r + k }[A ] + k
B
•
r[A ]
AB
(8)
R and â protons of the aldehyde and the hydrate at 270 MHz,
when present. Although it is known that the hydrate concentra-
tion decreases as the ionic strength increases,14a the hydrate
Buffer ratios of 25% (r ) 3), 50% (r ) 1), and 80% base
r ) 0.25) were used in each case. Similar results were obtained
(
concentration was shown not to vary once ionic strength was
kept constant. The percentage hydrate obtained where they
could be compared with literature values at 25 °C in water (m
)
2
not obtain a reproducible value for 3-chloropropanal (3) so the
values for the rate constants in Table 1 were calculated by
assuming 0% hydrated. Electron-withdrawing substituents are
known to increase the percentage of hydrate at equilibrium, and
-
-
by using plots of (kobs - ko)/[AcO ] against [AcO ], which
gave rkAB as slope and (kAr + kB) as intercept; such plots were
useful in determining the relative significance of each term. In
the case of the aldehydes, the kA term is in all cases a relatively
small contributor (typically 10%) to the reaction flux and the
error in this term is correspondingly larger ((20%).
1
4b,c
0) compare quite closely: acetaldehyde (1) 51.5%
and
-methylpropanal (4), 30%.1
4d,e
It is surprising that we could
Commercially available substrates were freshly distilled
immediately prior to use. All other substrates were prepared
by suitable modifications of existing literature procedures.15
Melting points were determined on a Gallenkamp melting point
block or on a B u¨ chi 530 melting point apparatus and are
uncorrected. Elemental analyses of compounds were performed
by the Microanalytical Laboratory, University College Dublin.
1
4f
h
Luz and Samuel have shown that the pK () -log[hydrate]/
(
11) Harper, E. T.; Bender, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5625.
(12) Carey, A. R. E.; Fukata G.; More O'Ferrall, R. A.; Murphy, M. G.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1985, 1711.
13) (a) Dawson, H. M.; Burton, D.; Ark, H. J. Chem. Soc. 1914, 105,
275. (b) Goswami, G.; Banerji, K. K. Z. Naturforsch. B 1971, 26, 383. (c)
(
1
1
H NMR spectra were recorded at 60 MHz on a JEOL JNM-
McTigue, P. T.; Gruen, L. C. Aust. J. Chem. 1963, 16, 177. (d) McTigue,
P. T.; Sime, J. M. Aust. J. Chem. 1967, 20, 905. (e) Talvik, A. J.; Hiidmaa,
S. O. Org. React (USSR) 1968, 5, 121, 297 (f) Baigrie, L. M.; Cox, R. A.;
Slebocka-Tilk, H.; Tencer, M.; Tidwell, T. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
(15) (a) MacLeod, A. J.; Rossiter, J. T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1.
1983, 717. (b) Aldersley, J. B.; Burkhardt, G. N.; Gillam, A. E.; Hindley,
N. C. J. Chem. Soc. 1940, 10. (c) Jones, E. R. H.; Sondheimer, F. J. Chem.
Soc. 1949, 614. (d) Bowers, A.; Jones, T. G.; Jones, E. R. H.; Lemin, A. J.
J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2548. (e) Hunziker, F.; M u¨ llner, F. X.; Schattenger,
H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1955, 38, 1943. (f) Dominguez, X. A.; Lopez, I. C.;
Franco, R. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 1625. (g) House, H. O.; Babad, H.;
Toothill, R. B.; Noltes, A. W. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 4141. (h) Weinberg,
N. L. Can. J. Chem. 1965, 43, 24. (i) Campbell, N. R.; Hunt, J. H. J. Chem.
Soc. 1950, 1379. (j) Overberger, C. G.; Kozlowski, J. H.; Radlmann, E. J.
Polym. Sci. A-1 1972, 10, 2265.
1
07, 3640.
14) (a) Cox, B. G.; McTigue, P. T. Aust. J. Chem. 1964, 17, 1210. (b)
(
Kurz, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 3524. (c) Bell, R. P.; Onwood, D.
P. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1962, 58, 1557. (d) Hine, J.; Houston, J. G.; Jensen,
J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 1184. (e) Gruen, L. C.; Mc Tigue, P. T. J.
Chem. Soc. 1963, 5217. (f) Greenzaid, P.; Luz, Z.; Samuel, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1967, 89, 749. (g) Hine, J.; Redding, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35,
2
769.