D. P. Naughton, M. Grootveld / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 2573–2575
2575
The ‘site-specific’ hydroxylation of the o-position of
tyrosine is evident from examination of space filling
models. However, hydroxylation of the p-position is
accounted for bythe relative position of the aromatic
rings. In the case where the aromatic rings interact with
the metal orbitals the proximityof the p-position to the
metal orbital would be expected to cause an enhanced
degree of hydroxylation at this site.13 The results from
visible absorption spectroscopystudies indicate that
hydroxylation of the aromatic ring followed by phe-
nolate binding to the ferric ion occurs. From exam-
ination of space-filling models, o-tyrosine is the only
8. Hermes-Lima, M.; Santos, N. C.; Yan, J.; Andrews, M.;
Schulman, H. M.; Ponka, P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999,
1426, 475.
9. Experimental: l-Phenylalanine (50 g, 0.3026 mol) was
refluxed in dryethanol (350 mL, 80 ꢃC, 3 h) with a slow stream
of dry HCl gas bubbling continuously. The hydrochloride salt
was recovered byevaporating the excess ethanol. The free
ester was then obtained byneutralisation with aqueous NaOH
solution (1.0Â10À1 mol dmÀ3) and then extracted with ethyl
acetate. EDTA bis-anhydride (3.306 g, 0.0129 mol), phenyl-
alanine ethyl ester (4.26 mL, 0.0258 mol) and pyridine (2.0 mL)
were refluxed in tetrahydrofuran (THF) for 3.5 h. The white
product was filtered and recrystallised from hot ethanol (mp
170 ꢃC). Elemental analysis: C, 59.99% (59.96), H, 6.27%
(6.62), N, 8.74% (8.58). 1H NMR analysis (D2O: 200 MHz,
298 K): d 1.23 [t, 3H, 3J=7 Hz, CH3], 2.5 [s, 4H, CH2CH2],
ꢀ
phenolate species, resulting from OH attack on the
phenylalanine moiety of EBET, which can participate
in intramolecular phenolate–iron(III) bonding (Scheme
1).
3
3.15 [m, 4H, J=11 Hz, CH2], 3.05 [s, 4H, CH2CONH], 3.18
[s, 4H, CH2COO], 4.19 [q, 3J=7 Hz, OCH2CH3], 4.65 [dt, 1H,
3J=11 Hz, CH], 7.30 [m, 8H, Ar].
These results show the potential of EBEP as a radical
scavenging chelator in biological systems. The stabilis-
ing effect and steric crowding caused byphenolate
binding to the ferric ion mayprevent the occurrence of
potentiallydeleterious redox chemistryat the active
metal ion centre.
10. HPLC studies: To an aqueous solution of the ligand
(EBEP, 2.20Â10À2 mol dmÀ3), one molar equivalent of iron(II)
sulphate (in an aqueous, N2-purged solution) was added fol-
lowed by3.00 mol equiv of H 2O2 solution. Subsequent to
incubation at 40 ꢃC for a 40 min period, the samples were
treated with 1.0 mol dmÀ3 NaOH solution at 60 ꢃC for a per-
iod of 2.5 h in order to hydrolyse the amide bond. This proce-
dure was followed bycentrifugation to remove the hydrated
iron(III) oxide precipitate. The resulting supernatants were
then subjected to HPLC analysis for separation and measure-
ment of aromatic hydroxylation products. Detection of these
products was byelectrochemical detection with the detector
potential set in the +0.70 to +0.85 V range. Authentic o-, m-
and p-tyrosine standards were subjected to HPLC analysis to
pre-calibrate the system.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Professor Peter Sadler, Universityof
Edinburgh and Dr. Christine Cardin, Universityof
Reading for helpful discussions.
In order to ensure that the proximityof the ligand to the
metal ion’s coordination sphere demonstrated an enhanced
potential with respect to the scavenging of OH radicals gen-
References and Notes
ꢀ
1. Liochev, S. I. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 1999, 36, 1.
erated from chelated iron ions relative to that of a 2:1 molar
ratio of the ‘free’ ligand (phenylalanine)/EDTA, suitable con-
trol experiments were conducted. A solution of iron(II) sulphate
was added to an aqueous solution containing 2.0 mol equiv of
phenylalanine, followed by an EDTA solution (1.00 mol equiv).
Finally, a solution of 3.30 mol equiv of H2O2 was added and the
reaction mixture was then equilibrated at a temperature of 40 ꢃC
for a 2.5 h period. Following removal of hydrated iron(III) oxide
as described above, the sample was subjected to HPLC analysis
and the products were detected via electrochemical oxidation.
The above experiments were also performed in the absence of
added iron as controls.
2. Lloyd, D. R.; Philips, D. H. Mutat. Res. 1999, 424, 23.
3. Huang, X.; Atwood, C. S.; Hartshorn, M. A.; Multhaup,
G.; Goldstein, L. E.; Scarpa, R. C.; Cuajungco, M. P.; Gray,
D. N.; Lim, J.; Moir, R. D.; Tanzi, R. E.; Bush, A. I. Bio-
chemistry 1999, 38, 7609.
4. Hashimo, M.; Hsu, L. J.; Xia, Y.; Takeda, A.; Sisk, A.;
Sundsmo, M.; Masliah, E. Neuroreport 1999, 10, 717.
5. Matthews, A. J.; Vercellotti, G. M.; Menchaca, H. J.;
Bloch, P. H.; Michalek, V. N.; Marker, P. H.; Murar, J.;
Buchwald, H. J. Surg. Res. 1997, 73, 35.
6. Melov, S.; Ravenscroft, J.; Malik, S.; Gill, M. S.; Walker,
D. W.; Clayton, P. E.; Wallace, C. E.; Malfroy, D. W.; Doc-
trow, S. R.; Lithgow, G. J. Science 2000, 289, 1567.
7. Kaur, H.; Fagerheim, I.; Grootveld, M.; Puppo, A.; Halli-
well, B. Anal. Biochem. 1988, 172, 360.
11. Grootveld, M.; Halliwell, B. Biochem. J. 1986, 237, 499.
12. Halliwell, B. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 49, 1341.
13. Yamuchi, O.; Kiyokazu, T.; Andopani, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 659.