presents a broad doublet at δ 6.46-6.43 corresponding to
the four hydrogens adjacent to the spiro carbon. Now, the
four hydrogens close to the cyanoimino groups are not
equivalent and appear as two broad doublets at 7.24-7.20
and 6.79-6.55 ppm due to the presence in solution of both
syn and anti isomers. This syn/anti isomerism is well-
documented in DCNQ and is due to the flipping of the cyano
groups attached to nitrogen atoms.16
acceptor character as a result of the presence of the
dicyanomethylene and cyanoimino groups, respectively,
which significantly shift the reduction potentials toward less
negative values (see Table 1 and Figure 1).
The TTF-type spiro compounds 13a-c were synthesized
by Wittig-Horner reaction of the carbanion generated in situ
from phosphonate esters (12a-c),17 in the presence of n-BuLi
at -78 °C, with dione 9 (Scheme 3). The analytical and
spectroscopic data clearly support the proposed structures
(see Supporting Information).
The redox properties of the novel spiro derivatives were
determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements
recorded at room temperature. The data obtained are collected
in Table 1 together with the redox potentials measured for 9
Table 1. Redox Potentials of the Novel Spiro Donor and
Acceptor Moleculesa
Figure 1. CVs for compounds 9 and 10 measured in CH2Cl2 at
room temperature (V vs Ag/Ag+; 100 mV/s).
compoundb
E1red
E2red
E1ox
E2ox
(pa)
(pc)
(pc)
(pa)
-2.07 (-1.94)c
-0.89 (-1.09)c -1.28 (-1.47)c
It is well-established that TCNQ and DCNQI present a
similar electrochemical behavior showing two one-electron,
reversible reduction waves to the corresponding radical anion
and dianion species.3 The spiro analogues 10 and 11 exhibit
a first irreversible reduction wave followed by a second
reversible wave (Table 1 and Figure 1). The reduction
potentials are cathodically shifted by about 1 V with respect
to the values measured for the parent TCNQ and DCNQI
and are in the range of those shown by some quinone
9
10
11
-1.03
0.22
-1.50
-0.35
-0.41
TCNQ
DCNQI
13a
13b
13c
0.21
0.55
1.03
0.66
0.60
0.44
1.09
0.98
0.77
TTFd
a Experimental conditions: GCE as working electrode, NBu4+ClO4- (0.1
M) as supporting electrolyte. b V vs SCE, CH2Cl2, 200 mV/s. c V vs Ag/
Ag+, CH2Cl2, 100 mV/s. d Anodic peaks
acceptors such as 9,10-anthraquinone derivatives (Er1ed
-0.9 V vs SCE).18
≈
The novel spiro donor molecules 13a-c show oxidation
potentials slightly more positive than those of the parent TTF
and quite similar to the well-known BEDT-TTF (E1ox ≈ 0.6
V vs SCE),2 thus exhibiting a strong electron-donor character.
However, the CV measurements are accompanied by an
immediate darkness of the solution, which apparently
indicates an extensive decomposition process due to the
electrochemical instability of the oxidized species. This
finding is in agreement with the irreversible character
observed for the first oxidation wave in 13a-c.
Compounds 13a-c show a similar behavior. In the first
scan, they exhibit an irreversible oxidation wave (∼0.6 V),
which should be reasonably attributed to the generation of
the radical cation. This wave could also correspond to the
formation of a diradical dication, in which the two orthogonal
dithiole moieties were simultaneously oxidized to a radical
cation in a manner similar to that found for some π-extended
TTF derivatives.19 In the following scans, a progressive
lowering of the first oxidation wave is observed and a second
oxidation wave appeared at more positive potentials.
The above electrochemical behavior suggests an ECE
(electrochemical-chemical-electrochemical) process as has
and for the parent compounds TTF, TCNQ, and DCNQI.
The quinone-type spiro compound 9 shows only one ir-
reversible reduction wave at -1.94 V. This value is higher
than that measured for p-benzoquinone (-0.60 V), suggesting
a weak electronic interaction between the two cyclohexenone
rings. Spirocompounds 10 and 11 show a stronger electron-
(9) (a) Hu¨nig, S.; Kemmer, M.; Meixner, H.; Sinzger, K.; Wenner, H.;
Bauer, T.; Tillmanns, E.; Lux, F. R.; Hollstein, M.; Gross, H. G.; Langohr,
U.; Werner, H.-P.; von Schu¨tz, J. U.; Wolf, H. C. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
1999, 899. (b) Neufeld, A. K.; Madsen, I.; Bond, A. M.; Hogan, C. F. Chem.
Mater. 2003, 15, 3573.
(10) (a) Du¨rr, H.; Gleiter, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17,
559. (b) Maslak, P.; Chopra, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9331.
(11) (a) Jamrozik, J.; Schab, S. Monatsh. Chem. 1994, 125, 1145. (b)
Grochowski, J.; Rutkowska, M.; Rys, B.; Serda, P.; Snatzke, G. Chem. Ber.
1992, 125, 1837. (c) Favaro, G.; Masetti, F.; Mazzuchato, U.; Ottavi, G.;
Allegrini, P.; Malatesta, V. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 1837.
(12) (a) Maslak, P.; Augustine, M. P.; Burkey. J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 5359. (b) Maslak, P. AdV. Mater. 1994, 6, 405.
(13) Farges, G.; Dreiding, A. S. HelV. Chim. Acta 1966, 49, 552.
(14) (a) Lehnert, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 26, 4723. (b) Lehnert, W.
Synthesis 1974, 667.
(15) Aumu¨ller, A.; Hu¨nig. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23,
447.
(16) Coss´ıo, F. P.; de la Cruz, P.; de la Hoz, A.; Langa, F.; Mart´ın, N.;
Prieto, P.; Sa´nchez, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 2407.
(17) Moore, A. J.; Bryce, M. R. Synthesis 1991, 26.
(18) Illescas, B. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005
297