C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Polymers 7-9
together via conjugated, difunctional NHCs. The polymerizations
did not require anhydrous conditions or inert atmospheres, and the
entire process, from commercial materials to polymeric products,
was accomplished in three simple manipulations with minimal tech-
nical difficulty. The physical properties of the polymers were found
to be dependent on both the transition metal and the modular struc-
tural characteristics of the NHC, and could be further modified
through post-polymerization ligation. Control over both molecular
weight and end-groups was also demonstrated through the inclusion
of chain transfer agents during polymerization. Combined with the
ability to prepare polymers with high molecular weights, these mod-
ular building blocks should open new opportunities in polymer syn-
thesis, conductive polymers, nonlinear optics, and electronic devices.
Full investigation of the electronic and physical characteristics of
the polymers presented herein will be reported in due course.
polymer
yield (%)a
Mn
×
103 Dab
Mw/Mn
Td
(°
C)c
λ
max (nm)e
Log(ꢀ e,f
)
7a
7b
7c
7d
8a
8b
9a
9b
90
84
99
76
85
84
98
93
18.4
1.9
1.8
1.3
1.7
2.0
1.4
1.5
2.6
291
316
314
329
322
308
308
323
329
4.72
4.72
4.45
4.51
4.80
4.93
4.63
4.92
d
103
1760
766
26.1
8.00
106
294
295
284
d
299
d
408
a Isolated yield. b Determined by GPC relative to polystyrene standards in
DMF. c The decomposition temperature (Td) is defined as the temperature at
which 10% weight loss occurs determined by thermogravimetric analysis under
N2, rate ) 10 °C/min. d Not determined. e Determined in DMF under ambient
conditions. f Per repeat unit.
Scheme 3
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of Texas at Austin
and the U.S. Army Research Office (W911NF-05-1-0430) for their
generous financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures and characterization of all new compounds. This material is
References
Table 2. Experimental and Theoretical Molecular Weight Data
for 11
(1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Holliday, B. J.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Commun.
2005, 23. (b) Pittman, C. U. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2005,
15, 33. (c) Moorlag, C.; Sih, B. C.; Stott, T. L.; Wolf, M. O. J. Mater.
Chem. 2005, 15, 2433. (d) Bunz, U. H. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003,
683, 269. (e) Nguyen, P.; Go´mez-Elipe, P.; Manners, I. Chem. ReV. 1999,
99, 1515. (f) Roncali, J. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1875. (g) Pickup, P. G.
J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1641.
a
b
polymer
Xn,theo
Xn,NMR
Mn,NMR
(
×
103 Da)b
Mn,GPC (×
103 Da)c
11a
11b
11c
10
20
40
8.9
23
47
6.4
17
34
4.8
8.5
11
(2) (a) Arduengo, A. J., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 913. (b) Arduengo,
A. J., III; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 361. (c)
Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290.
(3) For recent reviews, see: (a) Scott, N. M.; Nolan, S. P. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 1815. (b) Crudden, C. M.; Allen, D. P. Coord. Chem. ReV.
2004, 248, 2247. (c) Kavel, K. J.; McGuinness, D. S. Coord. Chem. ReV.
2004, 248, 671. (d) Peris, E.; Crabtree, R. H. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2004,
248, 2239. (e) Arnold, P. Heteroat. Chem. 2002, 13, 534.
(4) For selected examples see: (a) Chiu, P. L.; Chen, C. Y.; Zeng, J. Y.; Lu,
C. Y.; Lee, H. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 1682. (b) Marshall,
C.; Ward, M. F.; Harrison, W. T. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5703.
(5) Grundemann, S.; Kovacevic, A.; Albrecht, M.; Faller, J. W.; Crabtree, R.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10473.
(6) Chichak, K.; Jacquemard, U.; Branda, N. R. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002,
357.
(7) Wagner, E. C.; Millett, W. H. Org. Synth. 1939, 19, 12.
(8) This method, and variations thereof, are well-known for making bidentate
and bis(NHC) organometallic complexes, see: Herrmann, W. A.; Schwarz,
J.; Gardiner, M. G. Organometallics 1999, 18, 4082.
a Theoretical number average of monomer units per polymer chain given by
(2[4b]o/[10]o). b Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. c Determined by GPC
relative to polystyrene standards in DMF.
As with Pd, molecular weights were found to be dependent on the
organic moiety; however, the transition metal obviously played a
dominant role. Unfortunately, no polymeric materials were obtained
with Ni(OAc)2‚4H2O, which may reflect the reduced affinity of
NHCs for Ni.15
Since the metal centers in the main chain of the polymers are
coordinatively unsaturated, we envisioned altering the physical
properties of the macromolecules via a post-polymerization modi-
fication.16 For example, treatment of 8a, which is virtually insoluble
in THF,17 with 2 equiv of PCy3 or PPh3 resulted in rapid dissolution.
GPC and 1H NMR analysis of the phosphine-bound polymer
confirmed the macromolecular structure was not compromised.
Phosphine ligation to Pd was confirmed by 31P NMR spectroscopy
(δ ) 25 ppm).18
(9) Polymerizations proceeded at temperatures as low as 50 °C, although
longer reaction periods were required (3 h).
(10) Prolonged standing of 7b in H2O or 10% HCl (aq) did not affect
spectroscopic or molecular weight characteristics.
(11) Frøseth, M.; Netland, K. A.; Tornroos, K. W.; Dhindsa, A.; Tilset, M. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2005, 1664.
(12) Based on analogous small molecule reactions (cf. 8), polymer end groups
were assumed to be MX2; however, due to their high molecular weights,
conclusive evidence was not obtainable using 1H or 13C NMR spectro-
scopy.
(13) Mn’s are reported relative to polystyrene standards in DMF.
(14) The use of stronger bases (e.g., NaOH, Et3N) gave inferior yields of
polymer.
Precise control of molecular weight is essential for tailoring or
fine-tuning the physical characteristics of polymeric materials.19
Chain transfer agents (CTAs) have been used extensively to control
molecular weights of polymers obtained from equilibrium poly-
merizations.20 Since coordination of NHCs to Group X metals is
dynamic,21 inclusion of monofunctional NHCs as CTAs during these
polymerizations should provide an effective handle for controlling
molecular weight. As shown in Scheme 3, copolymerization of 4b
with Pd(OAc)2 in the presence of various amounts of N,N′-
dibenzylbenzimidazolium bromide (10)22 provided the correspond-
ing end-functionalized polymers 11. Integration of the benzyl end-
groups (PhCH2- δ ) 6.2 ppm) with respect to the butyl groups
(ArNCH2- δ ) 4.8 ppm) along the polymeric backbone indicated
the molecular weights of the polymers were in excellent agreement
with their theoretical values based on complete incorporation of
the CTA (Table 2).
(15) Louie, J.; Gibby, J. E.; Farnworth, M. V.; Tekavec, T. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 15188.
(16) Boaen, N. K.; Hillmyer, M. A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 267.
(17) Polymers 7-9 exhibit good solubility in highly polar aprotic solvents (e.g.,
DMF, DMSO, and NMP).
(18) This is consistent with the reported 31P chemical shift for (PCy3)2PdCl2
(δ ) 21.2 ppm); see: Ru¨egger, H. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2004, 42, 814.
(19) Odian, G. Principles of Polymerization, 3rd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1991.
(20) Goethals, E. J. Telechelic Polymers: Synthesis and Applications; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
(21) (a) Gsto¨ttmayr, C. W. K.; Bo¨hm, V. P. W.; Herdtweck, E.; Grosche, M.;
Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1363. (b) Titcomb,
L. R.; Caddick, S.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Wilsona, D. J.; McKerrecherb, D.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 1388.
(22) Claramunt, R. M.; Elguero, J.; Meco, T. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1983, 20,
1244.
In conclusion, we have developed a highly efficient route to a
new class of organometallic polymers with metal centers linked
JA054029K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 36, 2005 12497