3
047
Synthesis
R. Mimura et al.
Paper
residue was dissolved in EtOAc and H O. The separated aqueous layer
sure to afford a residue (311 mg), which was subjected to silica gel
chromatography (EtOAc–hexane, 1:1) to furnish 19 (94 mg, 32% cal-
culated based on isocyanide 9) as a white solid.
2
was extracted with EtOAc, and the combined organic extract was
washed with brine and dried (Na SO ). Concentration under reduced
2
4
pressure afforded a residue (751 mg), which was subjected to silica
gel chromatography (EtOAc–hexane, 1:2) to furnish the Ugi coupling
product 17 (599 mg, 76%) as a yellow oil.
Mp 137–138 °C; [α]D18 +37.7 (c 1.00, CHCl3).
IR (KBr): 3300, 2949, 2871, 1746, 1654, 1541, 1457, 1201 cm–1
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl
): δ = 0.87 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6 H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.5
Hz, 6 H), 0.89 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6 H), 0.84–1.16 (m, 8 H), 1.25 (m, 2 H),
.44 (m, 2 H), 1.76 (br d, J = 12.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.79–1.88 (m, 4 H), 3.35 (s, 4
.
α]D20 +23.8 (c 1.00, CHCl3).
3
[
IR (NaCl): 3352, 2950, 2922, 1746, 1678, 1515, 1457, 1203 cm–1
.
1
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 0.87 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 0.88 (d, J = 7.0
H), 3.45 (s, 2 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 4.38 (m, 2 H), 6.90 (br d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H).
3
Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 0.84–1.14 (m, 4 H), 1.28 (m, 1 H),
1
H NMR (500 MHz, C D N): δ = 0.80 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6 H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.5
5
5
1
3
.45 (m, 1 H), 1.77 (br d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.80–1.89 (m, 2 H), 3.18–
.24 (m, 4 H), 3.37 (s, 2 H), 3.71 (s, 3 H), 4.33 (m, 1 H), 5.20 (d, J = 10.0
Hz, 6 H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6 H), 0.78–1.11 (m, 8 H), 1.46 (q, J = 13.0
Hz, 2 H), 1.52–1.61 (m, 2 H), 1.64–1.78 (m, 4 H), 1.99 (br d, J = 13.0 Hz,
2
1
13
Hz, 1 H), 5.23 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.78 (ddt, J = 6.3, 10.0, 16.5 Hz, 1 H),
H), 3.51 (s, 3 H), 3.80 (br s, 4 H), 3.82 (d, J = 17.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.85 (d, J =
7.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.71 (m, 2 H), 8.28 (br d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H).
7.66 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H).
13
C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 20.6, 20.9, 22.2, 25.2, 26.7, 29.5, 34.7,
3
C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 20.6, 21.0, 22.2, 25.1, 26.7, 29.5, 34.7,
3
0.2, 46.0, 46.2, 51.8, 55.6, 59.1, 168.9, 171.6.
40.1, 45.5, 46.2, 51.6, 55.0, 57.7, 58.3, 118.8, 133.8, 169.4, 171.1.
4
13
HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H32N O : 325.2491; found:
2
3
C NMR (125 MHz, C D N): δ = 21.1, 21.3, 22.7, 25.3, 26.8, 29.8, 35.3,
5 5
1.1, 46.2, 46.7, 51.4, 55.7, 58.8, 170.3, 172.1.
325.2478.
4
HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C27H50N O : 480.3801; found:
3
4
Methyl 2-(Bis{2-[(1S,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexylami-
no]- 2-oxoethyl}amino)acetate (19)
480.3807.
To a solution of 17 (250 mg, 0.77 mmol) in EtOH (7.70 mL) was added
N,N′-dimethylbarbituric acid (156 mg, 1.00 mmol) and Ph P (61 mg,
3
Supporting Information
0.23 mmol). After degassing the solution, Pd(OAc)2 (13 mg, 0.058
mmol) was added under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture
was stirred at r.t. for 1.5 h, and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The resulting residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography
Supporting information for this article is available online at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1380438.
S
u
p
p
o
nrtIo
i
g
f
rm oaitn
S
u
p
p
ortioIgnfmr oaitn
(EtOAc–hexane, 1:1) to afford a mixture of 18a and triphenylphos-
phine oxide (222 mg) as a brown oil.
References
A solution of the mixture containing 18a (222 mg) dissolved in 3 M
(
1) (a) Ichikawa, Y. Chem. Lett. 1990, 1347. (b) Ichikawa, Y. Synlett
HCl (2.0 mL) was stirred at 80 °C for 10 h, and washed with CH Cl .
2
2
1991, 715. (c) Ichikawa, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992,
The separated aqueous layer was concentrated in vacuo giving a solid
that was dissolved in toluene (ca. 5 mL). The solvent was removed
azeotropically on a rotary evaporator. After repeating this procedure
2
135. (d) Ichikawa, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Isobe, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 2429. (e) Ichikawa, Y.; Matsuda, Y.;
Okumura, K.; Nakamura, M.; Masuda, T.; Kotsuki, H.; Nakano, K.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2520.
(× 4), the crude white solid obtained was dried under vacuum for 30
min to yield the crude hydrochloride salt of 18b as a white solid (155
mg).
(
(
(
(
2) Saito, K.; Nishimori, A.; Kotsuki, H.; Nakano, K.; Ichikawa, Y.
Synlett 2013, 24, 757.
To a solution of the crude hydrochloride salt of 18b (155 mg) in MeOH
3) Saito, K.; Nishimori, A.; Mimura, R.; Nakano, K.; Kotsuki, H.;
Masuda, T.; Ichikawa, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 7041.
4) (a) Ugi, I.; Steinbrückner, C. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 2802.
(7.0 mL) was added aqueous formaldehyde (37%, 0.29 mL, 3.85
mmol). After stirring at 50 °C for 30 min, a solution of terpene isocya-
nide 9 (159 mg, 0.96 mmol) in MeOH (0.7 mL) was added. The reac-
tion mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 30 min, and then concentrated
under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was dissolved in EtOAc
(b) Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3168.
5) Tanaka, N.; Suto, S.; Asai, M.; Kusama, T.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi,
A.; Gonoi, T.; Fromont, J.; Kobayash, J. i. Heterocycles 2015, 90,
1
and H O, and the separated aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc.
2
73.
6) Suto, S.; Tanaka, N.; Fromont, J.; Kobayash, J. i. Tetrahedron Lett.
011, 52, 3470.
The combined organic extract was washed with brine, dried (Na SO )
2
4
(
(
and concentrated to afford the residue (284 mg), which was purified
by silica gel chromatography (EtOAc–hexane, 1:1) to afford 19 (199
mg, 54%, 3 steps from 17).
2
7) (a) Demharter, A.; Hörl, W.; Herdtweck, E.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 173. (b) Ugi, I.; Demharter, A.; Hörl, W.;
Schmid, T. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 11657.
One-Pot Synthesis of the Halichonadin M Analogue 19
8) For comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data sets of the IDA
(
A solution of glycine (136 mg, 1.82 mmol) and aqueous formaldehyde
methyl ester moiety in natural halichonadin Q (1) with those in
the tert-butyl and menthyl analogues 7 and 10a, see the Sup-
porting Information.
(37%, 0.45 mL, 6.05 mmol) in MeOH (5.0 mL) was stirred at 50 °C for 1
h. To this solution was added a solution of isocyanide 9 (200 mg, 1.21
mmol) in MeOH (1.0 mL). After stirring at 50 °C for 1 h, the reaction
mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a residue,
(9) Speziale, A. J.; Jaworski, E. G. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 728.
(10) Garro-Helion, F.; Merzouk, A.; Guibe, F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
6109.
which was dissolved in EtOAc and H O. The separated aqueous layer
2
was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic extract was washed
with brine and dried (Na SO ) and concentrated under reduced pres-
(11) Although we observed the formation of 16 by TLC, a serious
problem in separating a by-product having an R value similar to
2
4
f
that of 16 hampered further optimization of this process.
©
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synthesis 2015, 47, 3043–3048