View Article Online
Table 2 Aza-Michael reactions of various carbamates with b-phenyl-
the present reaction system. When the total product was treated
a
enones
with the catalyst system under the same reaction conditions, the
retro-aza-Michael reaction was not observed. So this result
indicated that the reaction is not under thermodynamic control.
UV analysis of a CH
FeCl ·6H O showed a large wavelength shift (251 nm in
CH Cl and 234 nm in CH CN), while solutions of chalcone
and FeCl ·6H O, aq. HBF and Cu(OTf) showed no significant
wavelength change (226 nm in CH CN). It is suggested that the
mode of interaction of the substrates with this catalytic system
would differ from that of conventional Brønsted acids.
2 2 3
Cl solution of chalcone, Me SiCl and
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
4
2
Entry
Enone
Carbamate
Time/h
12
Yield (%)b
3
1
2
NH
2
CBZ
CBZ
50
42
NH
2
18
Notes and references
‡
(
Representative aza-Michael addition reaction was as follows: FeCl
27 mg, 0.1 mmol) and the enones (1 mmol) were dissolved in CH
ml). Me SiCl (1.1 mmol) was added. Then carbamate (1.2 mmol) was added
3
·6H
2
O
(3
3
4
24
24
24
52
40
45
2
Cl
2
3
in one portion. The yellow solution was stirred at room temp. and
conversion was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the
mixture was quenched with 5 ml sat. aq. NaHCO
was extracted with CH Cl . The combined organic layers were dried over
Na SO , filtered, and evaporated. The crude product was purified by
column chromatography (eluting solvent EtOAc/petroleum ether).
3
, and the aqueous layer
5
NH
2
COOEt
2
2
2
2
4
a
Reactions carried out with FeCl
SiCl (1.1 mmol) in CH
Isolated yield after column chromatography.
3
·6H
2
O (10 mol%), enone (1 mmol),
carbamate (1.2 mmol), Me
3
2
Cl (3 ml) at room temp..
2
b
1
(a) G. Cardill and C. Tomasini, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1996, 117; (b)
Enantioselective Synthesis of b-Amino Acids, ed. E. Juaristi, Wiley-
VCH, New York, 1997; (c) The Organic Chemstry of b-Lactams, ed. G.
I. George, VCH, New York, 1993; (d) E. Juaristi and H. Lopez-Ruiz,
Curr. Med. Chem., 1999, 6, 983; (e) D. Seebach and J. L. Matthews,
Chem. Commun., 1997, 2015; (f) W. J. Drury, D. Ferraris, C. Cox, B.
Young and T. Leckta, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1998, 120, 11006; (g) E.
Hagiwara, A. Fujii and M. Sodeoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
Table 3 Aza-Michael reactions of various carbamates with cyclic enones
2
474; (h) J. K. Myers and Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8959;
(i) S. Abele and D. Seebach, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 6, 1.
2
(a) M. E. Jung, in Comprehensive Orgnic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost and
I. Fleming, Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, vol. 4, p. 30; (b) S. Kobayashi and
H. Ishitani, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 1069 and refs. therein (c) K. Manabe
and S. Kobayashi, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 1965; (d) O. Okitsu, H. Oyamada,
T. Furuta and S. Kobayashi, Heterocycles, 2000, 52, 1143; (e) H.
Ishitani, M. Ueno and S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
8180.
TMS
(equiv.)
a
Yield (%)b
Entry
Enone
Carbamate
Time/h
1
2
24
18
—
Tracec
88
1.1
3
4
M. Arend, B. Westermann and N. Risch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998,
37, 1044.
(a) P. Perlmutter, Conjugate Addition reactions in Organic Synthesis,
Pergamon, New York, 1992, p. 114; (b) M. Perez and R. Pleixates,
Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 8355; (c) N. Asao, T. Shimada, T. Sudo, N.
Tsukada, K. Yazawa, Y. S. Gyoung and Y. Yamamoto, J. Org. Chem.,
3
4
18
12
1.1d
1.1
82
90
5
NH
2
COOEt
12
1.1d
1.1
89
1
997, 62, 6274 and refs. therein (d) S. D. Bull, S. G. Davies, S. Delgado-
6
7
8
9
12
10
12
12
92
93
66
30
Ballester, G. Fenton, P. M. Kelly and A. D. Smith, Synlett, 2000, 1257;
(e) L. Fadini and A. Togni, Chem. Commun., 2003, 30; (f) M. Sani, L.
Bruche, G. Chiva, S. Fustero, J. Piera, A. Volonterio and M. Zanda,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2060.
S. Matsubara, M. Yoshioka and K. Utimoto, Chem. Lett., 1994, 827.
T. P. Loh and L. L. Wei, Synlett, 1998, 975.
0.5
0.25e
0.05
0.5
5
6
1
0
NH
NH
2
CBZ
CBZ
12
81
1
1
1
2
12
12
0.05
1.1
46
85
7 (a) M. Kawatsura and J. F. Hartiwig, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 1960;
(b) M. P. Sibi and S. Manyem, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 8033; (c) W.
Zhuang, R. G. Hazell and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. Commun., 2001,
1240; (d) M. L. Sibi and M. Liu, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 3393; (e) M. P. Sibi,
J. J. Shay, M. Liu and C. P. Jasperse, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
6615.
1
3
2
12
0.5
83
1
1
a
4
5
12
12
1.1d
1.1
74
87
8 G. Bartoli, M. Bosco, E. Marcantoni, M. Pertrini, L. Sambri and E.
Torregiani, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 9052.
Reactions carried out with cyclic enone (1 mmol), carbamate (1.2 mmol),
in CH
2
Cl
2
(3 ml) at room temp. using FeCl
3
·6H
2
O (10 mol%) and Me
3
SiCl.
SiCl.
9 N. Srivastava and B. K. Banik, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 2109.
10 (a) M. J. Gaunt and J. B. Spencer, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 25; (b) T. C.
Wabnitz and J. B. Spencer, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 3891; (c) T. C.
Wabnitz, J. Q. Yu and J. B. Spencer, Synlett, 2003, 1070; (d) T. C.
Wabnitz and J. B. Spencer, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 2141.
b
c
Isolated yield after column chromatography. No addition of Me
3
d
e
3 2 3 2
Addition of 5 mol% FeCl ·6H O. Addition of 1 mol% FeCl ·6H O.
1
1 S. Kobayashi, K. Kakumoto and M. Sugiura, Org. Lett, 2002, 4,
319.
2 (a) J. Christoffers and H. Oertling, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 1339; (b) J.
Christoffers, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 1259; (c) J. Christoffers, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 943.
reaction can be performed with 50 mol% Me
3
SiCl without
1
sacrificing yield (entries 7, 10 and 13).
1
The reaction was performed with FeCl
addition of Me SiCl in CH Cl
3
·6H O without
2
3
2
2
or acetonitrile, but Michael
adducts were not obtained. On the other hand, Me SiCl was also
3
1
3 E. Nakamura, S. Aoki, K. Sekiya, H. Oshino and I. Kuwajima, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 8056.
ineffective in aza-Michael reactions with these less nucleophilic
carbamates. To get insight into the reaction mechanism, we
performed several experiments to confirm the possibilities in
14 R. E. J. Beckwith, N. Heron and N. S. Simpkins, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2002, 658, 21.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2570–2571
2571