.
Angewandte
Communications
ing lactone 15 under basic conditions, setting the stage for the
key cascade transformation.
Initially, approaches were examined in which the trisub-
stituted olefin would serve as a nucleophile (e.g. X = H,
SiMe3) in the opening of the elecrophilic cyclopropane in 15
to deliver tetracyclic product 17 (Scheme 4).[21] However, no
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: a) DBU (2 equiv), MeCN, 08C to
808C; b) LiCl (10 equiv), Me2SO/H2O (10:1), 1608C, 60% over two
steps; c) Na, NH3 (l), EtOH, THF, ꢀ788C; d) (COCl)2 (2.5 equiv),
Me2SO (5 equiv), NEt3 (10 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ788C to RT; e) 2m HCl,
acetone, 608C; f) Dess–Martin periodinane (1.1 equiv), NaHCO3
(5 equiv), CH2Cl2, 54% over four steps; g) baker’s yeast, sugar, EtOH,
H2O, 77% (87% brsm); h) 2-isopropenylMgBr (0.5m in THF,
2.2 equiv), LaCl3·2LiCl (0.5m in THF, 1.1 equiv), THF, 08C, 88%;
i) tBuMe2SiOTf (1.1 equiv), 2,6-lutidine (4 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ788C, 98%;
j) 13 (2 equiv), Rh2(esp)2 (0.1 mol%), CH2Cl2, 08C, d.r.=4.4:1, 66%
(70% brsm); k) aq. sat. NaHCO3, MeOH, RT, quantitative.
brsm=based on recovered starting material, DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo-
[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, esp=a,a,a’,a’-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionic
acid.
Scheme 4. Radical cyclopropane-opening/annulation/elimination cas-
cade. Reagents and conditions: a) SeO2 (50 mol%), tBuO2H (5m in
n-C9H17, 2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 08C to RT; then NaBH4 (1.0 equiv), MeOH,
08C, 74% over two steps; b) Me3COCl (1.2 equiv), 4-dimethylamino-
pyridine (5 mol%), pyridine, 08C to RT, 95%. DMPU=1,3-dimethyl-
3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone, TBS=tert-butyldimethylsilyl.
such reaction was observed despite extensive experimenta-
tion with various Lewis acids (e.g. EtAlCl2, TiCl4, SnCl4). We
then turned our attention towards a reversal of reactivity
wherein the alkene would serve as an acceptor to a reactive,
nucleophilic species at C(10) derived from reductive opening
of the cyclopropane. Samarium(II) iodide[22] is known to
promote the opening of acceptor-substituted cyclopropanes at
room temperature or above. The resulting carbon-centered
radicals have been exploited in simple systems for subsequent
reactions, such as radical annulations or further reduction to
form organosamarium species.[23]
Exposure of 15 to excess SmI2 in refluxing THF afforded
low yields (< 10%) of tetracyclic 17. Interestingly, 17 was
accompanied by equimolar amounts of reduction product
bearing an isopropyl at C(5) with the remaining mass balance
corresponding to polymeric material. This result was hypothe-
sized to arise from a disproportionation reaction of tertiary
radical II (X = H, Scheme 4), formed through cyclopropane-
opening and subsequent radical olefin cyclization (15!I!
II). We speculated that offering the radical at C(4) a suitable
leaving group (X) would enable a favorable termination
pathway, leading to increased product formation.
With a route to enantiopure 5 established, nucleophilic
addition of 2-isopropenyl magnesium bromide to the hin-
dered ketone was investigated. Intriguingly, although initial
tests with the corresponding TBS-protected hydroxyketone
failed to give any product,[16] the use of free alcohol 5 with two
equivalents of nucleophile afforded the tertiary alcohol with
complete exo-diastereoselectivity,[17] albeit at low conversion
owing to competing enolization of the starting ketone. This
problem was circumvented by the use of soluble lanthanide
salts (LaCl3·2LiCl in THF),[18] yielding the monoprotected
diol 12 in excellent yield after selective TBS-protection of the
secondary alcohol (86% over two steps).
At this stage, the synthetic plan called for selective
cyclopropanation of the newly introduced olefin. We were
drawn to the use of phenyliodonium malonates such as 13 as
a consequence of their reported selectivity for 1,1-disubsti-
tuted over trisubstituted olefins. Moreover, their use in Rh-
catalyzed cyclopropanations enables the alkene to be the
limiting reagent without the need for slow addition of the
carbene precursor.[19] After preliminary experiments, we were
pleased to observe that [Rh2(esp)2][20] catalyzed the reaction
efficiently to afford cyclopropane 14 as a separable 4.4:1
mixture of diastereomers in good yield (66%). The major
diastereomer was subsequently converted to the correspond-
Inanata and co-workers showed that allylic acetates can
afford terminal olefins in the cyclization of ketyl or aryl
radicals.[24] This was proposed to occur by a second single-
electron reduction of the resulting carbon-centered radical
and subsequent anionic b-elimination. More recently, Nico-
laou and co-workers made use of an allylic carbonate as
a leaving group in the application of a ketyl radical cyclization
in their synthesis of vannusal B.[25]
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!