Paired Electrosynthesis of Cyanoacetic Acid
carrying out the electrolysis at +1.67 V led to a signifi-
cant decrease of the current efficiency and only 4 g of
CA/faraday was obtained. If the electrolysis was carried
It is known that in the first electron transfer for the
2
0-22
reduction of CO
ever, it has also been published that the CO
2
anion, formed in the CO cathodic reduction in acetoni-
2
a radical anion is obtained.
How-
2
-radical
out at +0.82 V using Bu
4
NBr as the supporting electro-
2
3
lyte, only traces of CA were found. In this case, dibro-
moacetonitrile was obtained as the major product (MS
trile/tetraalkylammonium salts, evolves to formate. For
this reason an electrolysis was carried out in absence of
+
+
m/e (relative intensity) EI: 201 (M + 4, 24), 199 (M +
2
8
2
CO , but in the presence of tetraethylammonium formate
+
, 48), 197 (M , 26), 120 (100), 118 (94), 93 (33), 91 (31),
1 (69), 79 (69)); a small amount of bromoacetonitrile was
dropped into the anodic compartment. In this case, no
CA was detected.
Another possibility described in the literature24 in-
volves the formation of oxalate in the catholyte through
also found.
Due to the possible industrial interest in this paired
reaction, the electrolysis was also carried out using one
dimerization of the electrogenerated CO -radical anion.
2
of the cheapest tetraalkylammonium salts, Bu
as the electrolyte. The results were similar to those
obtained with Bu NBF (see Table 1).
4
NHSO
4
,
In our case, small amounts of oxalic acid were found in
the catholyte. To eliminate the oxalate anion as the
species that migrates to the anolyte, electrolysis in
4
4
The type of separator employed in the divided cell has
a strong influence upon the CA yield. Thus, when a
cation-exchange membrane (Nafion) was used in place
of a glass-frit diaphragm, CA was not formed.
If the electrolysis is carried out by bubbling CO into
2
the anolyte, not the catholyte chamber, then CA is not
obtained.
absence of CO , but in the presence of added tetraethyl-
ammonium oxalate, dropped into the anodic compart-
2
ment, was carried out. However, no traces of CA were
detected.
It has been postulated24,25 that the CO -radical anion
2
reacts with a CO2 molecule to afford the -OCOOCO
•
radical anion dimer. Recently, it has also been postu-
lated26 that two CO -radical anions can react by a head-
The electrolysis has also been performed in an undi-
2
-
-
vided cell. Thus, using Bu
4
NBF
4
as electrolyte under the
to-tail reaction affording the dianion OCOOCO . How-
ever, the existence of a negative charge on a carbonyl
carbon seems highly unlikely, and this species should
same experimental conditions as described above, the
yield on CA decreased to 2.4 g/faraday.
Results similar to those obtained at constant potential
were obtained for electrolysis carried out at constant
current, even if the nature of the cathode was changed.
immediately evolve to CO and CO32 , as described.
-
24
In conclusion, the nature of the migrating molecule to
the anodic compartment should be either a CO -radical
2
•
For example, a constant current electrolysis (current
-
anion or the higher stabilized dimer OCOOCO radical
anion.
2
density: 15 mA/cm ) using Bu
4
NBF
4
as supporting
electrolyte in a divided cell and with Pb as cathode
afforded similar results than those obtained at controlled
potential. It was also demonstrated that when the
concentration of the supporting electrolyte drops near
during the electrolysis, the current also drops to zero.
(
3) What is the nature of the anodically generated
species that reacts with the migrating “CO -compound”?
2
It is well-known that acetonitrile is a very stable
molecule with a wide potential window, in both the
positive and the negative potential regions, and it is also
very well-known that the positive potential limit for the
SSE is fixed by the anodic oxidation of the anion of the
supporting electrolyte.27
As we have noted, the applied potential for the
synthesis of CA depends on the supporting electrolyte
employed and it corresponds to the oxidation potential
of the anion of each electrolyte.
Discu ssion
Before suggesting a mechanism it is necessary to
clarify the following questions:
(1) In which compartment does the formation of CA
take place?
2
The fact that CA was not obtained in a CO -saturated
catholyte when a cation exchange membrane was used
clearly points out that CA is not generated by cathodic
Cauquis et al. had demonstrated28 that the anodic
oxidation of supporting electrolyte anions leads to radical
intermediates. For instance, oxidation of tetrafluorbo-
rates at a platinum anode in acetonitrile yield the
reduction of acetonitrile and further attack of the anion
-
2 2
CH CN upon CO . Moreover, under our experimental
adduct29 CH
CN.BF . Its formation can be explained by
3 3
conditions acetonitrile is not reduced at the cathode,
because 3-aminocrotonitrile tetraalkylammonium salts
were not detected in the catholyte. The literature18,19
indicates that these compounds should be formed if
reduction of acetonitrile occurred. Thus, it is highlighted
that CA is formed only in the anolyte and that the CA
detected in the catholyte is only the result of its diffusion
from the anolyte.
(20) Desilvestro, J .; Pons, S. J . Electroanal. Chem. 1989, 267, 207.
(
(
21) Amatore, C.; Saveant, J .-M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5021.
22) Gressin, J .-C.; Michelet, D.; Nadjo, L.; Saveant, J .-M. Nouv. J .
Chim. 1979, 3, 545.
23) Kushi, Y.; Nagao, H.; Nishioka, T.; Isobe, K.; Tanaka, K. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 2175.
24) Keene, R. R. In Electrochemical and Electrocatalytic Reactions
(
(
of Carbon Dioxide; Sullivan, R. B. P., Krist, K., Guard, H. E., Eds.;
Elsevier: New York, 1993; Chapter 1, p 9.
(
2
2) What is the nature of this migrating “CO -
(25) Nielsen, M. F.; Utley, J . H. P. In Organic Electrochemistry;
compound”? It is obvious that the formation of 1 equiv
of CA in the anolyte requires the transport of 1 equiv of
CO -reduction product from the catholyte to the anolyte.
2
Lund, H., Hammerich, O., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001;
Chapter 21, p 831.
(
26) Flyunt, R.; Schuchmann, M. N.; von Sonntag, C. Chem. Eur.
J . 2001, 7, 796.
27) Lund, H. In Organic Electrochemistry; Lund, H., Hammerich,
(
(
18) Foley, J . K.; Korzeniewski, C.; Pons, S. Can J . Chem. 1988, 66,
O., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001; Chapter 5, p 263.
(28) Cauquis, G.; Serve, D. J . Electroanal. Chem. 1970, 27, 3-6.
(29) Lund, H. In Organic Electrochemistry; Lund, H., Hammerich,
O., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001; Chapter 5, p 264.
2
2
01.
(19) Batanero, B.; Barba, F.; Mart ´ı n, A. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
369.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 7, 2004 2425