TABLE 2. Spectral Characteristics of Compounds 2a,b to 4a,b
Com-
pound*
-1
1
IR spectrum, ν, cm
Н NMR spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz)
2
2
a
2253 (C≡N), 1749 (C=O), 1.68 (3H, d, J = 7.5, CH
050 (s, C
7.00-7.50 (5H, m, Ar)
2248 (C≡N), 1765 (C=O) 1.75 (3H, d, J = 7.0, CH
.85 (2H, t, J = 7.2, CH
CH cycle); 4.20 (2H, dt, J = 5.6, J = 1.0, N−CH
.03 (2H, t, J = 10.4, =CH ); 5.75 (1H, ddt, J = 15.5,
J = 10.4, J = 5.6, =CH−)
2252 (C≡N), 1750 (C=O), 1.60 (3H, s, CH ); 2.40 (4H, m, CH -α); 3.12 (2H, t, J = 7.0,
3 2
); 2.40 (2H, t, J = 7.0, CH -α);
3
6 5
H )
b
3
); 2.42 (2H, J = 7.2, CH
-β); 4.12 (1H, qd, J = 7.0, J = 1.0,
);
2
-α);
3
2
2
5
2
3
3
a
3
2
3
050 (s, C
6
H
5
)
CH -α); 3.80 (1H, dt, J = 13.0, J = 7.0, CH -β); 4.05 (1H,
2
2
dt, J = 13.0, J = 7.0, CH
2
-β); 7.13-7.55 (5H, m, Ar)
b
2251 (C≡N), 1750 (C=O)
1.70 (3H, s, CH
J = 7.0, CH -α); 3.80 (1H, dt, J = 13.0, J = 7.0, CH
.05 (1H, dt, J = 13.0, J = 7.0, CH
3
); 2.42 (4H, m, CH
2
-α); 3.12 (2H, t,
-β);
-β); 4.20 (2H, dt,
2
2
4
2
J = 5.6, J = 1.0, N−CH
2
2
); 5.03 (2H, t, J = 10.4, =CH );
5.75 (1H, ddt, J = 15.5, J = 10.4, J = 5.6, =CH−)
4
4
a
3753 (NH), 3480 (OH),
1.68 (3H, s, CH
3
); 2.32 (1H, m, CH
2
-α); 2.48 (1H, CH -α);
2
2
1
1
3
755 (C=O), 1630 (C=O), 2.55 (1H, m, CH -β); 2.62 (1H, m, CH -β);
2
080, 1210 (C=S),
050 (s, C
7.45 (2H, m, Ar); 7.65 (3H, m, Ar)
6
5
H )
b
3750 (NH), 3480 (OH),
1.75 (3H, s, CH ); 2.32 (1H, m, CH
3
2
-α); 2.48 (1H, m,
1
1
765 (C=O), 1630 (C=O), CH -α); 2.55 (1H, m, CH -β); 2.62 (1H, m, CH -β);
080-1210 (C=S)
2
2
2
4.40 (2H, dt, J = 5.6, J = 1.0, N−CH ); 5.03 (2H, t,
2
2
J = 10.4, =CH ); 5.75 (1H, ddt, J = 15.5, J = 10.4,
J = 5.6, =CH−)
_
*
2
______
UV spectrum, λmax, nm (log ε): 2a 246 (3.21), 268 (4.01); 2b 248 (3.25),
78 (4.01); 3a 246 (3.25), 278 (4.01); 3b 248 (3.17), 178 (4.01).
signals of the substituents for all compounds 2-5 were in agreement with the proposed structures. There were
peaks in the mass spectra of compounds 2-4 of medium intensity for the molecular ions, the character of the
breakdown of which confirms the structures of these products.
EXPERIMENTAL
The IR spectra (KBr disks) were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer 2000 Fourier spectrometer, the mass
1
spectra on a MX 1303 instrument, and the H NMR spectra on a INM 4-100 instrument in CDCl , internal
3
standard was HMDS (δ 0.05 ppm). The UV spectra of solutions in ethanol were taken on a Hitachi EPS 3T
spectrometer. The purity of the products and the progress of reactions was checked by TLC on Silufol UV 254
plates in the system methanol–benzene, visualizing with iodine vapor.
Interaction of 3-R-5-methyl-2-thiohydantoins 1a,b with Acrylonitrile. Thiohydantoin 1a (1.03 g,
0
0
.005 mol) and a catalytic quantity of sodium hydroxide were added to a solution of acrylonitrile (1.98 g,
.015 mole) in alcohol (20 ml). The mixture obtained was stirred for 1 h forming a transparent solution, from
which a copious white precipitate began to precipitate. The reaction mixture was maintained at room
temperature for 1 h, the solid was filtered off, and recrystallized from alcohol. 5-(β-Cyanoethyl)-2-(β-
cyanoethylthio)-5-methyl-3-phenylhydantoin (3a) (0.78 g) was obtained. The filtrate was evaporated, the
residue, oily crystals of a light yellow color, was treated with 5% sodium hydroxide solution, and further (0.1 g)
product 3a was filtered off. The alkaline mother liquor was neutralized with dilute hydrochloric acid, the
precipitated solid was filtered off, and recrystallized from benzene. 2-(β-Cyanoethylthio)-5-methyl-3-
1
396