[(Me3tacn)PdIIIX2(m-X)PdIIIX2(Me3tacn)](PF6) (X = Cl 2a,
X = Br 2b), in which a single halide ion bridges the two Pd
centers (Scheme 1 and Figure 1b; Supporting Information,
ing Information, Figure S31).[12] This observation suggests
that the use of alternate exogenous ions can lead to PdIII
complexes with bridging ligands and altered electronic
properties.[18] Complexes 2a–c are structural models of the
[8]
ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ
dinuclear unit found in M X M X 1D extended chains
in the average-valent Mott–Hubbard (MH)[8,19] state MIII
ꢀ ꢀ
X
MIII (that is, a Robin–Day class III state).[20] The bridging
halide ligand in 2a–c is located at the midpoint between the
two metal centers,[21] while the short Pd···Pd distances (2a
4.931 ꢀ, 2b 5.133 ꢀ, 2c 5.031 ꢀ, Figure 1b; Supporting
Information, Figure S31)[22] suggest an intimate orbital over-
lap between Pd and the bridging halide that is supported by
the observed strong antiferromagnetic coupling between the
unpaired dz2 electrons of the two PdIII centers,[23] which is
typical for a delocalized MH state.[8,19b]
The UV/Vis spectra of complexes 2a–c in MeCN reveal at
least three intense absorption bands at 535–570 nm, 360–
410 nm, and 260–280 nm, respectively (Table 1 and
Figure 2).[24] Density functional theory (DFT) and time-
Scheme 1. Electrochemical synthesis of dinuclear PdIII complexes and
their interconversion to mononuclear PdII and PdIV complexes.
Figure S31).[13,15] Each metal center has a distorted octahedral
geometry with two N atoms and the two terminal halides in
the equatorial plane, while the third N atom of Me3tacn and
the bridging halide occupy the axial positions. The coordina-
tion geometry of Pd atoms and the overall charge of the dimer
confirm the presence of PdIII centers. To the best of our
knowledge, complexes 2a and 2b are the first dinuclear PdIII
[3,7]
ꢀ
complexes that are not stabilized by a Pd Pd bond.
Furthermore, this result suggests that stabilization of the
PdIII oxidation state can also be achieved by a tridendate
N-ligand and does not require a rigid tetradentate ligand.[6]
The formation of dinuclear PdIII complexes 2a and 2b
from the mononuclear precursors 1a and 1b is intriguing. The
circa 65% yield of product suggests that the bridging halide
ion comes from another molecule of the PdII precursor.[16]
Indeed, addition of 0.5 equiv of external halide leads to a
simpler CV that shows only two closely spaced oxidative
waves (Table 1; Supporting Information Figures S1–S4), and
CPE at 0.3–0.4 V leads to formation of dark purple complexes
2a and 2b in higher yields (ca. 80%).[12,17] Interestingly, when
Brꢀ was added to a solution of 1a, the mixed halide complex
[(Me3tacn)PdIIICl2(m-Br)PdIIICl2(Me3tacn)](PF6) (2c) formed
(Scheme 1), as confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Support-
Figure 2. UV/Vis spectra of 1a (a), 2a (c), and 3a (g) in
MeCN. Inset: CV of 1a in the presence of 0.5 equiv Clꢀ (g) and
1 equiv Clꢀ (c) in 0.1m Bu4NPF6/MeCN.
dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations were employed in
the assignment of these transitions. For 2a, the 534 nm band
exhibits an uncommonly large extinction coefficient (e =
21000 Lmolꢀ1 cmꢀ1) and is assigned to an intermetallic Pd-
to-Pd charge transfer (MMCT)[25] transition that is strongly
mixed with a m-Cl-to-Pd CT transition (LMCT).[26] A similar
assignment has been proposed for the low-energy transitions
Table 1: Spectroscopic properties of dinuclear PdIII complexes 2a–c.
II/III
III/IV
1
1
Complex E = , E =
UV/Vis (MeCN)
in PdIII X Pd X 1D chains. TD-DFT calculations sup-
port such an assignment by revealing a large oscillator
strength for the HOMO to LUMO + 1 MMCT transition,
where the HOMO exhibits s-bonding Pd-m-Cl character and
the LUMO + 1 has antibonding Pd-m-Cl character (Figure 3).
Furthermore, the higher-energy bands can be assigned to a
combination of bridging and terminal halide-to-Pd LMCT
bands (for example, HOMOꢀ10 and HOMOꢀ12 to
LUMO + 1, respectively; Figure 3), as suggested previously[8]
and supported by TD-DFT calculations.[12] As expected, the
replacement of Clꢀ with Brꢀ ligands for 2a to 2c to 2b leads to
III
[8]
2
2
ꢀ ꢀ
ꢀ
[mV][a]
l [nm] (e [Lmolꢀ1 cmꢀ1])
2a
55, 163
534 (21000), 449 (sh, 4900), 360 (6100),
260 (43000)
2b
2c
45, 171
570 (25000), 411 (8900), 273 (47000)
546 (17000), 378 (6800), 262 (41000)
65, 174[b]
[a] Potentials vs. Fc+/Fc are measured by differential pulse voltammetry
(DPV) for solutions of 1a or 1b in the presence of 1 equiv of Clꢀ or Brꢀ,
respectively, in 0.1m Bu4NPF6/MeCN. Complexes 2a–c show two
oxidation waves at similar potentials (see the Supporting Information).
[b] Potentials are measured by DPV for a solution of 1a in the presence of
1 equiv of Brꢀ.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5532 –5536
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5533