1630 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 101, No. 9, 1997
Chambers and Baker
formed via hydrogasification of the solid carbon. While in-
situ electron microscopy experiments have demonstrated that
the onset of cobalt-catalyzed hydrogenation of graphite com-
mences at 450 °C,35 studies with this technique revealed that
the introduction of a small amount of chlorine into the system
resulted in the complete suppression of this particular type of
reaction.33 Moreover, the results of current studies where the
yield of methane exhibited a precipitous drop when ethylene
was removed from a reactant stream also containing an excess
of hydrogen together with 100 ppm chlorine is consistent with
the conclusion that in this system methane does not arise from
hydrogasification of carbon.
one may conclude that in all cases the adatom is capable of
exerting an effect on all the faces of the metal particles and
inducing changes in the nature of the metal-metal bonding at
the carbon-depositing regions.
Acknowledgment. Financial support for this work was
provided by the United States Department of Energy, Basic
Energy Sciences, Grant DE-FG02-93ER14358.
References and Notes
(1) Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R. In Catalyst DeactiVation, Bartholomew, C.
H., Butt, J. B., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1991; p 85.
(2) Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R. J. Catal. 1984, 85, 31.
(3) Kim, M. S.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1993,
143, 449.
(4) Owens, W. T.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. Catal. Today
1994, 21, 3.
(5) Owens, W. T.; Kim, M. S.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. In
Catalyst DeactiVation 1994; Delmon, B., Froment, G. F., Eds.; Elsevier
Science: Amsterdam, 1994; p 191.
(6) Cullis, C. F.; Manton, J. E.; Thomas, G. B.; Wilman, H. Acta Cryst.
1959, 12, 382.
(7) Wu, X.; Gerstein, B. C.; King, T. S. J. Catal. 1992, 135, 68.
(8) Verderone, R. J.; Pieck, C. L.; Sad, M. R.; Parera, J. M. Appl. Catal.
1986, 21, 239.
(9) Pieck, C. L.; Marecot, P.; Parera, J. M.; Barbier, J. Appl. Catal.
1990, 126, 235.
(10) Iyagba, E. T.; Hoost, T. E.; Nwalor, J. U.; Goodwin, J. G. J. Catal.
1990, 123, 1.
(11) Peri, S. S.; Lund, C. R. F. J. Catal. 1995, 152, 410.
(12) Burch, R.; Chalker, S.; Loader, P.; Thomas, J. M.; Ueda, W. Appl.
Catal. 1992, 82, 77.
(13) Warren, B. K. Catal. Today 1992, 13, 311.
(14) Nitta, Y.; Hiramatsu, Y.; Imanaka, T. J. Catal. 1990, 126, 235.
(15) Foger, K.; Jaeger, H. Appl. Catal. 1989, 56, 137.
(16) Feeley, O. C.; Sachtler, W. M. H. Appl. Catal.1991, 75, 93.
(17) Chambers, A.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1996, 158, 356.
(18) Rodriguez, N. M.; Kim, M. S.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1993,
144, 93.
(19) Chambers, A.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Phys. Chem.
1995, 99, 10581.
(20) Krishnankutty, N.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal.
1996, 158, 217.
(21) Owens, W. T.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Phys. Chem.
1992, 96, 5048.
(22) Rodriguez, N. M.; Chambers, A.; Baker, R. T. K. Langmuir 1995,
11, 3862.
In a previous investigation dealing with the interaction of
copper-nickel and ethylene/hydrogen,36 the unexpected high
yields of methane were accounted for in terms of a change in
the mode of adsorption of the olefin when such a molecule
encounters a nickel atom whose nearest neighbor is a copper
atom. It was postulated that since copper does not readily
chemisorb hydrocarbons, the ethylene would bond to the surface
in an “end-on” arrangement. In this conformation the adsorbed
molecule would rapidly rearrange to form an “ethylidyne”
intermediate, which would subsequently undergo C-C bond
scission to produce a methane molecule, leaving a residual
carbon atom on the metal surface, that would eventually
contribute toward the growth of a carbon filament. If, however,
this was the major route for methane formation, one would
expect to find a corresponding decrease in the amount of solid
carbon formation. Inspection of the data presented in Tables 1
and 2 shows that the observed enhancement in methane
formation is not accompanied by a corresponding decrease in
magnitude of solid carbon deposition, and therefore one is forced
to conclude that some other mechanism must be operative in
the formation of the paraffinic product.
4. Influence of Chlorine on the Structural Characteristics
of Carbon Filaments. Finally, the presence of foreign atoms
is likely to have a direct impact on the wetting characteristics
of the metal with respect to solid carbon, and as a consequence,
both the degree of crystallinity and morphology of the carbon
deposit are expected to be subject to major modifications. In
previous studies we have shown that the degree of crystalline
perfection of carbon filaments is intimately related to the nature
of the interfacial phenomena that exist at the metal-solid carbon
boundary.4,37 In order for dissolved carbon to be precipitated
in a highly crystalline form, there must be a registry between
the atomic spacing of the metal atoms in the depositing face
and the atoms constituting the graphite basal plane structure.
These conditions are generally achieved when the modified
metal faces undergo a wetting and spreading action with
graphite, i.e., form a strong metal-support interaction.38
The introduction of a small concentration of chlorine into
either the cobalt or iron-ethylene/hydrogen systems was found
to produce a significant improvement in the degree of crystalline
perfection of the precipitated carbon filament structures, but did
not appear to exert any modifications on the morphological
characteristics of the deposit. This behavior is to be contrasted
with the changes that were observed in the conformation of
carbon filaments when small amounts of either sulfur3-5,39 or
phosphorus40 were added to a hydrocarbon feed undergoing
reaction with cobalt, nickel, and iron powders. In these cases
the filaments were generated in the form of regularly coiled
structures that exhibited a somewhat lower degree of crystalline
perfection than the material formed under the same conditions
on the respective unadulterated metal powders. Despite the
difference in the influence of the these additives on the growth
characteristics of carbon filaments to that observed with chlorine,
(23) Rodriguez, N. M. J. Mater. Res. 1993, 8, 3233.
(24) Dowben, P. A.; Jones, R. G. Surf. Sci. 1979, 84, 449.
(25) Kiskinova, M.; Goodman, D. W. Surf. Sci. 1981, 108, 64.
(26) Somorjai, G. A. Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994.
(27) Erley, W. Surf. Sci. 1982, 114, 47.
(28) Gudde, N. J.; Lambert, R. M. Surf. Sci. 1983, 134, 703.
(29) Mueller, D. R.; Rhodin, T. N.; Sakisaka, Y.; Dowben, P. A. Surf.
Sci. 1991, 250, 185.
(30) Shih, H. D.; Jona, F.; Jepson, D. W.; Marcus, P. M. Phys. ReV.
Lett. 1981, 46, 731.
(31) Cabane-Brouty, F.; Oudar, J.; Bernard, J. Acta. Metall. 1962, 10,
901.
(32) Oudar, J.; Barbouth, N.; Bernard, J. Mem. Sci. ReV. Metall. 1975,
72, 649.
(33) Baker, R. T. K.; Lund, C. R. F.; Dumesic, J. A. Carbon 1983, 21,
469.
(34) Martin, G. A. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Imelik,
B., et al., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1982, Vol. 11, p 315.
(35) Oh, S. G.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1993, 143, 449.
(36) Kim, M. S.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1991,
131, 60.
(37) Kim, M. S.; Rodriguez, N. M.; and Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1992,
134, 253.
(38) Angermann, H. H.; Horz, G. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1993, 70, 163.
(39) Kawaguchi, M.; Nozaki, K.;Motojima, S.; Iwanaga, H. J. Crystal
Growth 1992, 118, 309.
(40) Motojima, S.; Hasegana, I.; Kagiya, S.; Momiyama, M.; Kawaguchi,
M.; Iwanaga, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 62, 2322.