hydroxyanthecotulide (2)6 and analogues.7 We also
viewed alcohols 5 as potentially versatile substrates for
conjugate addition and isomerization chemistry, which
could lead to other bioactive natural product classes
(see later).
With bromolactone 3 in hand, Barbier-type coupling
withbenzaldehyde wasinvestigated. Allylic chromium11 or
zinc12 intermediates (Scheme 1, M = CrLn or ZnLn) were
considered to have the potential to provide high regio- and
stereoselectivity in the CÀC bond forming step, together
with lactone functional group tolerance. In the event, using
the chromium(II) sources CrCl2,13 CrCl3/LiAlH4,14
a
catalytic chromium process (CrCl3/Mn/TMSCl),15 zinc
with satd aq NH4Cl in DMF,16 or indium in the presence
of a Lewis acid,17 gave in all cases one major diastereoi-
somer of methylene lactone 5a by crude 1H NMR analysis
(Table 1).
Scheme 1. Direct Synthesis of β-(Hydroxymethyl)-R-methylene-
γ-butyrolactones 5 from Aldehydes
Table 1. Evalution of Different Allylation Conditions with 3
and Benzaldehyde
So as to investigate the above chemistry bromolactone
3, previously accessed in six steps from γ-butyrolactone,8
was conveniently prepared from commercially avail-
able tulipalin (6)9 (Scheme 2). Bromination of 6 with
phenyltrimethyl ammonium tribromide, followed by
regioselective elimination using LiBr/Li2CO3 in DMF,10
gave bromolactone 3 in 55% yield after one purifica-
tion step.
entry
conditions
yield of 5a (%) dr
1
2
3
CrCl2 in DMF (rt, 15 h)
83
68
85
97:3
98:2
98:2
CrCl3/LiAlH4 in THF (rt, 15 h)
Cat. CrCl3/Mn/TMSCl/i-Pr2EtN in THF
(rt, 15 h)
4
5
Zn/trace sat. aq NH4Cl in DMF (rt, 15 h)
In/Eu(OTf)3 in sat. aq NH4Cl (rt, 15 h)
83
67
95:5
97:3
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Bromolactone 3
Due to the comparative experimental simplicity of the
zinc protocol (Table 1 entry 4),18 it was decided to evaluate
the scope of the allylation process with different aromatic
aldehydes under the zinc conditions (Table 2).
The chemistry was found to tolerate electron-rich (entries
4and 6) and -deficient(entry 7) aromaticaldehydesand the
presence of aryl halide (entries 2, 3 and 5), hydroxyl (entry
6), cyano (entry 7), and carbamate (entry 8) functionality.
The stereochemistry of the major diastereoisomer 5b aris-
ing from 1-naphthaldehyde (Table 2, entry 1) was estab-
lished by X-ray crystallographic analysis18 and is con-
sistent with the transition state indicated in Scheme 1.
Also, MOM protection of alcohol 5e (Table 2, entry 4)
gave a MOM ether18 of established configuration, which
has previously been converted into the insecticide
(3) (a) Lin, S.-H.; Chen, C.-C.; Vong, W.-J.; Liu, R.-S. Organome-
tallics 1995, 14, 1619–1625. (b) Chen, C.-C.; Fan, J.-S.; Shieh, S.-J.; Lee,
G.-H.; Wang, S.-L.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9279–9287.
(c) Shiu, L. H.; Wang, S.-L.; Wu, M.-J.; Liu, R. S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1997, 2055–2062. (d) Chandrasekharam, M.; Liu, R.-S. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 9122–9124.
(4) During the course of our studies, a single example of this process
involving zinc with 3 and a complex chiral aldehyde was reported in a
patent: (a) Xu, X.; Yang, H.; Qiao, X.; Xie, L. CN 101481367, 2009;
Chem. Abstr., 2009, 151, 245843. (b) The reaction of zinc with 3 and
formaldehyde has also been recently reported: Yang, H. S.; Qiao, X. X.;
Cui, Q.; Xu, X. H. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009, 20, 1023–1024.
(5) Abou El-Ela, M.; Jakupovic, J.; Bohlmann, F.; Ahmed, A. A.;
Seif El-Din, A.; Khafagi, S.; Sabri, N.; El-Ghazouly, M. Phytochemistry
1990, 29, 2704–2706.
(12) Luche, J. L.; Sarandeses, L. A. In Organozinc Reagents; Knochel,
P., Jones, P., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999; pp 307À323.
(13) Nishitani, K.; Konomi, T.; Mimaki, Y.; Tsunoda, T.; Yamakawa,
K. Heterocycles 1993, 36, 1957–1960.
ꢀ
(6) Theodori, R.; Karioti, A.; Rancic, A.; Skaltsa, H. J. Nat. Prod.
2006, 69, 662–664. Corrigendum: J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 804.
(7) The stereochemistries of 1 and 2 are currently not known with
certainty.
(14) Okuda, Y.; Nakatsukasa, S.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Chem.
Lett. 1985, 481–484.
€
(15) Furstner, A.; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12349–12357.
ꢀ
(8) (a) Calderon, A.; de March, P.; el Arrad, M.; Font, J. Tetrahedron
(16) Zinc in THF was very slow, giving only a trace of 5a after 10 h.
Zinc in DMF proceeded to completion, but required prolonged reaction
time; the reaction was also accelerated by the addition of PhCO2H
(1 equiv), albeit less efficiently than with NH4Cl.
(17) Loh, T.-P.; Cao, G.-Q.; Pei, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1457–
1460.
1994, 50, 4201–4214. See also: (b) Chapleo, C. B.; Svanholt, K. L.;
Martin, R.; Dreiding, A. S. Helv. Chim. Acta 1976, 59, 100–107.
(9) Murray, A. W.; Reid, R. Synthesis 1985, 35–38.
(10) Ando, M.; Wada, T.; Isogai, K. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6235–
6238.
(18) See the Supporting Information for details.
(19) For details of aldehyde preparation see the Supporting
Information.
(11) Hodgson, D. M.; Comina, P. J. In Transition Metals for Fine
Chemicals and Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 469À481.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 10, 2011
2595