Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 5
tion limit in compound 5 is blue shifted compared to
. This is confirmed by UV/VIS absorption spectros-
This work was supported by the Deutsche For-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
4
schungsgemeinschaft within the framework of grant
GRK1782. We thank Jan Christman for his help with the
synthesis and Vanessa Dahmen for her help with the
spectroscopic experiments.
copy (Figure S2). This is confirmed by UV/VIS ab-
sorption spectroscopy (Figure S2). The white-light
spectrum in both compounds is limited by reabsorp-
tion from the fundamental electronic transition of
REFERENCES
1
the cluster-core.
(1) (a) Mueller-Mach, R.; Mueller, G.; Krames, M. R.; Höppe,
In conclusion, we have investigated the nonlinear
optical response of two series of organotetrel chalco-
genide cluster compounds of the general formula
H. A.; Stadler, F.; Schnick, W.; Juestel, T.; Schmidt, P. Phys. St.
Solid. A 2005, 202, 1727–1732. (b) Nakamura, S. SPIE 1997, 3002,
26-35. (c) Kimme, F.; Brick, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Khanh, T. Appl.
Opt. 2013, 52, 8779-8788
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
[
(RT) S ] (R = Me, Np, Sty, Ph; T = Si, Ge, Sn) and
4 6
(2) (a) Franken, P.; Hill, A.; Peters, C.; Weinreich, G. Phys.
identified prerequisites for either SHG or white-light
generation. Variation of the ligand R showed that,
Rev. Lett. 1961, 7, 118–119. (b) Petrov, V.; Ghotbi, M.; Kokabee,
O.; Esteban-Martin, A.; Noack, F.; Gaydardzhiev, A.; Ebrahim-
Zadeh, M. Laser Photon. Rev. 2010, 4, 53–98.
for a given size of the inorganic [T S ] cluster-core,
4
6
(3) (a) Nikogosyan D. N., Nonlinear Optical Crystals: A Com-
white-light generation is observed when R efficiently
prevents any order of the solid compounds. Opening
a capability of order via intermolecular interactions
reduces the efficiency of the white-light generation.
Allowing for more order – in the case of T = Sn real-
ized by small Me ligands or enhanced π-stacking
capabilities – changes the nonlinear response from
white-light to second-harmonic generation. This was
ultimately proven by SHG observed for a long-range
ordered system of a single-crystal. The reasons for
long-range order to occur are suitable relative sizes of
T, E, and R components and/or pronounced π-
stacking capability.
plete Survey; Springer: Berlin, 2005. (b) Boyd R. W. Nonlinear
Optics, Third Edition; Elsevier Science: New York, 2008.
(
4) (a) Green, M. L. H.; Marder, S. R.; Thompson, M. E.; Ban-
dy, J. A.; Bloor, D.; Kolinsky, P. V.; Jones, R. J. Nature 1987, 330,
60-362. (b) Alford, W. J.; & Smith, A. V. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2001,
3
18, 524. (c) Muhammad, S.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Irfan, A. Chaudhry
A.R. J. Mol. Graph. Modell. 2016, 68, 95-105. (d) Kanseri, B.;
Bouillard, M.; Tualle-Brouri, R. Optics Comm. 2016, 380, 148-153.
(e) Canagasabey, A.; Corbari, C.; Gladyshev, A. V.; Liegeois, F.;
Guillemet, S.; Hernandez, Y.; Yashkov, M. V.; Kosolapov, A.;
Dianov, E. M.; Ibsen, M.; Kazansky, P. G. Optics Lett. 2009, 34,
2483-2485.
(5) (a) R. R. Alfano, The Supercontinuum Laser Source, Spring-
er, New York, 2016. (b) Birks, T. A.; Wadsworth, W. J.; Russell, P.
St. J. Optics Lett. 2000, 25, 1415-1417. (c) Husakou, A. V.;
Herrmann, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 203901.
For comparable systems that show the same type of
non-linear response, it was shown that changing T
from Sn to Ge results in a blue shift of the absorption
edge and thus in a blue shift of the white-light emis-
sion. Both findings underline the white-light genera-
tion mechanism proposed in previous studies.
(6) (a) Santner, S.; Heine, J.; Dehnen, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2016, 55, 876-893. (b) Thiele, G.; Franzke, Y.; Weigend, F.;
Dehnen, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11283−11288. (c)
Eußner, J. P.; Dehnen, S. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11385-11388.
(d) Bron, P.; Johansson, S.; Zink, K.; Schmedt auf der Günne, J.;
Dehnen, S.; Roling, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15694−15697.
(e) Lin, Y.; Massa, W.; Dehnen, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
4497-4500. (f) Hassanzadeh Fard, Z.; Halvagar, M. R.; Dehnen, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2848-2849.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(7) Rosemann, N. W.; Eußner, J. P.; Beyer, A.; Koch, S. W.;
Supporting Information. Further information on
synthesis and characterization (NMR, TGA/DSC, µRFA,
PXRD, UV/Vis and IR spectroscopy) and CIF. This ma-
terial is available free of charge via the Internet at
http://pubs.acs.org.
Volz, K.; Dehnen, S.; Chatterjee, S. Science 2016, 352, 1301.
(8) (a) Crystal structure of 1: Kobelt, D.; Paulus, E. F.; Scherer,
H. Acta Crystallogr. 1972, B28, 2323. (b) Synthesis of 4: H. Berwe,
A. Haas, Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 1175–1182. (c) Synthesis of 6: Fehér,
F.; Lüpschen, R. Z. Naturforsch. 1971, 26b, 1191.
(9) (a) Hu, S.; Song, G.; Li, W.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, L.; Xue, Y.; Liu,
Q.; Chen, Z.; Hu, J. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 2325. (b) Panda, S.;
Antonakos, A. ; Liarokapis, E.; Bhattacharya, S. ; Chaudhuri, S.
Mater. Res. Bull. 2007, 42, 576. (c) Deshpande, N.; Sagade, A. ;
Gudage, Y. ; Lokhande, C. ; Sharma, R. J. Alloys Compd. 2007,
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
4
36, 421.
10) Nikolic, P. M.; Popovic, Z. V., J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys.
979, 12, 1151.
(
Author Contributions
1
N.W.R, J.P.E., and E.D. contributed equally.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ACS Paragon Plus Environment