ChemPlusChem
10.1002/cplu.201900282
FULL PAPER
Vario Micro cube for C, H, N, S Analyser by Elemental Analyser System
Thermo Finnigan FLASH EA 1112 series. Single crystal X-ray diffraction
data were collected on an Agilent Supernova X-calibur diffractometer
equiped with Eos CCD detector. The CCDC 1891530 (1) and 1891531
Acknowledgements
The wrok is financillay supported by the Science and
Engineering Research Board (SERB), India (Order No.
EEQ/2018/000014) and the Spanish MINECO (project
CTQ2017-87201-P AEI/FEDER, UE) and the Generalitat
Valenciana (Prometeo program).
(
2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These
data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre.
Magnetic properties
Magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out in the
temperature range 2–300 K with an applied magnetic field of 0.5 T on
polycrystalline samples of compounds 1 and 2 (with masses of 7.32 and
Keywords: coordination chemistry • Friedel--Crafts
alkylation • heterogeneous catalysis • lanthanides • single-
molecule magnetism
8.24 mg, respectively) with a Quantum Design MPMS-XL-5 SQUID
susceptometer. AC susceptibility measurements were performed on the
same samples with fields oscillating at frequencies in the range 0.2-1500
Hz in the temperature range 1.8-12.0 K. For both samples, we initially
performed AC measurements at 1.8 K as a function of the applied DC
field (up to 0.5 T) with an AC frequency of 110 Hz (see supporting
information). Susceptibility data were corrected for the contribution of the
sample holder and the diamagnetic contribution of the salts using
Pascal’s constants.[50]
[
[
[
[
1]
2]
3]
4]
G. E. Kostakis, A. K. Powell, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2686-
697.
2
X.-Y. Zheng, J. Xie, X.-J. Kong, L.-S. Long, L.-S. Zheng, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 222-236.
M. Yadav, A. Mondal, V. Mereacre, S. K. Jana, A. K. Powell, P.
W. Roesky, Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 7846-7856.
J. Goura, J. P. S. Walsh, F. Tuna, V. Chandrasekhar, Dalton
Trans. 2015, 44, 1142-1149.
Synthesis of the ligand (H
The ligand was synthesized by the condensation of 4-tert-butyl-2,6-
diformylphenol (0.5 g, 2.43 mmol) with 2-amino-4-nitrophenol (0.749 g,
3
L)
[5]
[6]
J. Goura, J. P. S. Walsh, F. Tuna, V. Chandrasekhar, Inorg.
Chem. 2014, 53, 3385-3391.
R. Sessoli, A. K. Powell, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2328-
2341.
4.86 mmol) under reflux in a mixture of ethanol (30 mL) and toluene (15
mL) for four hours. The resulting deep brown solid was isolated and
washed with ethanol several times to remove any unreacted starting
materials. It was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 0.918 g, 79.0 %.
ESI-MS scan: expected 478.45; Observed 501.17 [M + Na] . IR (KBr, cm
1)
: 3445(br), 3080(w), 3041(w), 2963(m), 2871(w), 1640(m), 1617(s),
[7]
[8]
J.-C. G. Bunzli, S. V. Eliseeva, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1939-1949.
J. Rocha, L. D. Carlos, F. A. A. Paz, D. Ananias, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2011, 40, 926-940.
+
-
[9]
H. Tsukube, S. Shinoda, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2389-2404.
[10] M. Shibasaki, N. Yoshikawa, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2187-2210.
[11] G. K. Veits, J. Read de Alaniz, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 2015-2026.
[12] G. Maayan, G. Christou, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7015-7021.
1
8
517(s), 1476(m), 1327(s), 1239(s), 1130(w), 1086(m), 1058(m), 1014(w),
89(w), 828(m), 752(m), 667(m), 579(m).
[
13] V. G. K., W. D. R., R. d. A. Javier, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010
49, 9484-9487.
,
General procedure for the synthesis of complexes 1 and 2:
Complexes 1 and 2 were synthesized following the same procedure. To
a solution of H L (0.125 mmol) and Et N (0.174 mL) in 6 mL of DMF,
3
3
[14] D. P. A., B. R. A., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 10862-10866.
[15] L. I. Palmer, J. Read de Alaniz, Organic Letters, 2013, 15, 476-
479.
hydrated lanthanide nitrate (0.125 mmol) was added. The resulting
mixture was stirred for 24 hours at room temperature to obtain an orange
coloured solution. The resulting solution was filtered off and the filtrate
was kept for slow evaporation. Brown coloured crystals suitable for single
crystal X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained after 3 weeks.
[16] A. Dey, S. Das, S. Kundu, A. Mondal, M. Rouzières, C.
Mathonière, R. Clérac, R. Suriya Narayanan, V. Chandrasekhar,
Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 14612-14623.
[17] V. Chandrasekhar, P. Bag, W. Kroener, K. Gieb, P. Müller, Inorg.
Chem. 2013, 52, 13078-13086.
[
Dy
3
L
3
(DMF)
3
(H
2
O)
2
]·3.8DMF (1): Yield: 60 mg, 58% (with respect to
29.8: C 45.35 %, H 4.48 %, N
ligand). Anal Calcd. for C92.4
H
108.6Dy
3
N
18.8
O
[18] H. L. C. Feltham, R. Clérac, L. Ungur, L. F. Chibotaru, A. K.
Powell, S. Brooker, Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 3236-3240.
[19] K. C. Mondal, G. E. Kostakis, Y. Lan, W. Wernsdorfer, C. E.
Anson, A. K. Powell, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 11604-11611.
[20] T. D. Pasatoiu, J.-P. Sutter, A. M. Madalan, F. Z. C. Fellah, C.
Duhayon, M. Andruh, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 5890-5898.
[21] A. K. Jami, V. Baskar, E. C. Sañudo, Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52,
2432-2438.
-
1
1
3
1
0.76 %. Found: C 45.32%, H 4.56%, N 10.92%. (KBr pellet, cm ):
440(br), 2956(s), 1662(w), 1488(m), 1381(m), 1291(s), 1178(w),
059(m), 888(w), 836(m), 754(w), 646(m).
[
Nd
3
L
3
(DMF)
3
(H
2
O)
2
]·3.8DMF (2): Yield: 48 mg, 48% (with respect to
29.8: C 46.39 %, H 4.57 %, N
ligand). Anal Calcd. for C93.4
H
3 18.8
108.6Nd N O
-
1
1
3
1
1.00 %. Found: C 46.37 %, H 4.56 %, N 11.15 %. IR (KBr pellet, cm ):
442(br), 2969(s), 1658(m), 1620(w), 1576(w), 1479(m), 1397(w),
282(s), 1173(m), 1085(w), 1052(w), 835(w), 649(m).
[22] B. Na, X.-J. Zhang, W. Shi, Y.-Q. Zhang, B.-W. Wang, C. Gao, S.
Gao, P. Cheng, 2014, 20, 15975-15980.
Catalytic protocol: Aldehyde (0.25 mmol) and Indole (0.5 mmol) were
added to a mixture of EtOH/H O (2:1, 6 mL) followed by addition of the
catalyst (1 %, mol). The resulting solution was heated at 60 °C for 6
hours. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted with CH Cl and filtered
2
[23] L. Zhang, P. Zhang, L. Zhao, J. Wu, M. Guo, J. Tang, Dalton
Trans. 2016, 45, 10556-10562.
2
2
[24] D. Chen, L. Yu, P. G. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4467-
4470.
through celite. The filtrate was concentrated under low pressure and the
crude was extracted with a ethyl acetate/water mixture. The organic layer
was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The resulted product was
purified by column chromatography (chloroform: petroleum ether, 50:50).
The isolated product was characterized by NMR spectroscopy and mass
spectrometry (figures S10-S39, supporting information).
[25] S.-W. Li, R. A. Batey, Chem. Commun. 2007, 3759-3761.
[26] K. Griffiths, P. Kumar, G. R. Akien, N. F. Chilton, A. Abdul-Sada,
G. J. Tizzard, S. J. Coles, G. E. Kostakis, Chem. Commun. 2016
,
52, 7866-7869.
[27] K. Griffiths, C. W. D. Gallop, A. Abdul-Sada, A. Vargas, O.
Navarro, G. E. Kostakis, Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 6358-6361.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.