Table 1. Screening of Active Microorganisms in Guttiferone A Biotransformations
incubations
culture of
total number
entry
1
microorganisms
step 1
step 2
4 assays
of assays
selected microorganism (yielda)
8 strains
15 strains
12 strains
2 mixtures of 4 strains:
1 gave biotransformation
3 mixtures of 5 strains:
1 gave biotransformation
4 combinatorial mixtures:
1 gave biotransformation
6
Rhodotorula buffonii MUCL29812 (48%)
2
3
5 assays
8
4
Candida pinus MUCL 27856 (19%)
Pichia anomala NRRL Y40 (17%)
no assay required
a Yield in compound 2 after purification.
be a lead in the search for new antimalarial drugs.9,14
Several actions of guttiferone A toward cell pathologies
and specific enzymatic activities have also been reported.11,15
Concerning the antiparasitic activities, it is worth noting
that Malaria remains one of the most important infectious
diseases causing 1 million deaths every year. Due to the
rising prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance, the
treatment of malaria is becoming increasingly difficult.
There is therefore an urgent need to diversify the antima-
larial therapeutic arsenal. Most of the antimalarial drugs
are natural products and natural product analogues.
For this reason, our group investigated the antiparasitic
potency of guttiferone A analogs. Because it is isolated
from fruits, guttiferone A is an interesting renewable
starting material for semisynthesis. Within the field of
natural products, pharmacomodulation has provided sig-
nificant results.16
Then to improve selected activity, we wanted to generate
a library of guttiferone A derivatives for performing
structureꢀactivity relationship studies. Among the strate-
gies used, we studied the biotransformation to obtain
selective modifications, and yeast-mediated transforma-
tions have been investigated with the hope to stereospeci-
fically reduce one of the carbonyl groups.
We present here the results of original approaches in the
screening of microorganism strain collections, the finding
of an unexpected yeast-mediated oxidation reaction, and
its use in the efficient synthesis of the natural product and
analog.
Microbial reduction of ketones especially with baker
yeast is largely documented;17 however the reduction is
strongly influenced by the bulkiness of substituents of the
carbonyl group. It turns out that the baker yeast is not
effective in benzophenone reduction, so we screened the
35 yeasts in our collection.
Usually a selection of active microorganisms was per-
formed by incubation of an individual strain with a sub-
strate to be transformed resulting in a number of tests
equal to the number of strains to be tested. In order to
reduce the number of assays, the selection of active yeasts
was performed using a new approach, based on the
implementation of biomass mixtures (Table 1). At first,
we tested mixtures of four (entry 1) and five (entry 2)
different strains (step 1), and biotransformations were
monitored by HPLC and mass spectrometry. Then the
microorganisms that were present in the mixtures able to
transform guttiferone A were tested individually (step 2),
and R. buffonii and C. pinus were selected among eight and
fifteen strains through 6 and 8 assays, respectively.
To improve our strategy, mixtures were carried out
using combinatorial distribution (entry 3). This approach
allowed identifying the active microorganisms without
further incubation (for details, see Supporting Information),
and the yeast P. anomala was selected among twelve
strains through only four assays. Our combinatorial
approach is an efficient strategy; the number of assays is
reduced by three compared to traditional screening.
HPLC chromatographic profiles of biotransformation
media with the three selected microorganisms showed one
peak having the same retention time, which is longer than
the one of the starting material. A mass spectrometry
spectrum showed a m/z 601 for [MþH]þ corresponding
to a loss of two protons regarding guttiferone A. These
results suggested an oxidative reaction rather than an
expected reduction reaction, and the product has been
identified as 3,16-oxyguttiferone 2 by NMR analysis.
The loss of one proton in the aromatic part on the
NMR spectra of product 2 leads to the structure of an
(14) Acuna, U. M.; Figueroa, M.; Kavalier, A.; Jancovski, N.; Basile,
M. J.; Kennelly, E. J. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1775–1779.
(15) Tosa, H.; Iinuma, M.; Tanaka, T.; Nozaki, H.; Ikeda, S.;
Tsutsui, K.; Tsutsui, K.; Yamada, M.; Fujimori, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1997, 45, 418–420. Muleya, V.; Hayeshi, R.; Ranson, H.; Abegaz, B.;
Bezabih, M. T.; Robert, M.; Ngadjui, B. T.; Ngandeu, F.; Mukanga-
nyama, S. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2008, 23, 391–399. Martins,
F. T.; Assis, D. M.; dos Santos, M. H.; Camps, I.; Veloso, M. P.; Juliano,
M. A.; Alves, L. C.; Doriguetto, A. C. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44,
1230–1239. Dal Piaz, F.; Tosco, A.; Eletto, D.; Piccinelli, A. L.; Moltedo,
O.; Franceschelli, S.; Sbardella, G.; Remondelli, P.; Rastrelli, L.; Vesci,
L.; Pisano, C.; De Tommasi, N. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 818–827.
Figueredo, Y. N.; Garcia-Pupo, L.; Rubio, O. C.; Hernandez, R. D.;
Naal, Z.; Curti, C.; Andreu, G. L. P. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 116, 36–46.
Pardo-Andreu, G. L.; Nunez-Figueredo, Y.; Tudella, V. G.; Cuesta-
Rubio, O.; Rodrigues, F. P.; Pestana, C. R.; Uyemura, S. A.; Leopoldino,
A. M.; Alberici, L. C.; Curti, C. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 253, 282–
289.
(16) Robert, A.; Benoit-Vical, F.; Dechy-Cabaret, O.; Meunier, B.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 1173–1188. Gordaliza, M. Clin. Transl.
Oncol. 2007, 9, 767–776.
(17) Csuk, R.; Glanzer, B. I. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 49–97. Matsuda,
T.; Yamanaka, R.; Nakamura, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20,
513–557.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 19, 2012
5055