2946
C. Walpole et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 2942–2947
COR
N
F
F
F
F
F
O
R3SiOTf /
Et3N
NH2
NH
NH2
N(SiR3)2
NSiR3
N(SiR3)2
N
8
F
Lewis Acid
- (R3Si)2O
N(SiR3)2
F
N
F
NCOR
R3Si
5
7
F
F
COR
Lewis
Acid (M+)
H
N
N(SiR3)2
+
N
M
N
NCOR
3
2
+
N
F
F
F
9
R3SiN
F
NH2
Scheme 2. Possible mechanism for formation of fluoropiperidine spirocycles 2 and 3.
Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 305; (d) Mueller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Science 1881,
2007, 317; (e) Kirk, K. L. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 1013; (f) Kirch, P. Modern
Fluoroorganic Chemistry: Synthesis, Reactivity, Applications; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2004; (g) Bohm, H. J.; Banmer, D.; Bendels, S.; Kansy, M.; Kuhn,
B.; Muller, K.; Obst-Sander, U.; Stahl, M. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 637; (h) Ismail,
F. M. D. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002, 118, 27; (i) Smart, B. E. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001,
109, 3.
to 6.4:1 in favor of isomer 2c, with the combined yield of 2c and 3c
varying from 16% to 69% (Table 4, entries 2–8). Interestingly, the use
of indium chloride together with TBSOTf, led to the highest diaste-
reoisomeric ratio of 10:1, although in only 40% overall yield.
Finally, a similar approach could be employed for coupling ketal
6 with the hydrochloride salt of amidine 5 (Table 5). Formation of
2c over 3c was favored, with similar levels of diastereoselectivity
to that obtained from the ketone 4c. Optimal conditions were
found to use TMSOTf (8.0 equiv) and triethylamine (4.0 equiv) at
0 °C for 24 h, giving 2c and 3c in combined 83% yield, in a 6.3:1 ra-
tio (Table 5, entry 3). Reaction at higher or lower temperatures led
to lower product ratios or yields.
The origins of the diastereoselectivity differences obtained un-
der the various conditions are not clear. The major product 2 is
likely the thermodynamically more stable diastereomer,11 but it
is unlikely that the reaction is occurring under the conditions of
thermodynamic control, since a control reaction showed that
isomerization of either 2a or 3a did not occur under the reaction
conditions. A plausible mechanism for the formation of 2 and 3 in-
volves initial formation of the persilylated amidine 7, followed by
reaction with the fluoropiperidone 4 (or corresponding ketal 6)
to give 8. Subsequent Lewis acid promoted cyclization via 9 or a
similar intermediate and subsequent hydrolysis would then afford
2 and 3 (Scheme 2).
In summary, a practical and efficient route for the diastereose-
lective synthesis of novel spirocyclic fluoropiperidine quinazoline
selective iNOS inhibitors has been established. Initial attempts at
coupling the amidine and ketone partners by analogy with non-
fluorinated substituted piperidones led to unselective reaction
and poor reaction yields. However, unexpectedly we demonstrate
that the presence of silylation reagents and Lewis acids can signif-
icantly alter product selectivities and yields. Thus, the use of
TMSOTf or TBSOTf in excess, along with added triethylamine and
Lewis acids, was found to facilitate the coupling reaction of fluori-
nated piperidinones with ortho-aminobenzeneamidine. The spiro-
cyclic core generated in this manner was formed with improved
yields and diastereoselectivity favoring the desired diastereoiso-
mer 2. Similar conditions could also be employed using ketals
rather than the fluorinated piperidinone.
2. (a) O’Hagan, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308; (b) Hunter, L. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
2010, 6, 38; (c) Smart, B. E. Characteristics of C-F systems. In Organofluorine
Chemistry, Principles and Commercial Applications; Banks, R. E., Smart, B. E.,
Tatlow, J. C., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1994; pp 57–88.
3. (a) Shibata, N.; Ishimaru, T.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T. J. Fluorine Chem. 2007, 128,
469; (b) Nakagawa, K.; Okano, T.; Ozona, K.; Kato, S.; Kubodera, N.; Ohba, S.;
Itoh, Y.; Mikami, K. J. Fluorine Chem. 2007, 128, 654; (c) Kirk, K. L. Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2006, 6, 1447; (d) Sun, S.; Adejare, A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1457;
(e) Hamashima, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 1351; (f) Giannini, G. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2002, 9, 687.
4. (a) Vallance, P.; Leiper, J. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2002, 1, 939; (b) Maddaford, S.;
Annedi, S. C.; Ramnauth, J.; Rakhit, S. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 2009, 44,
27.
5. Tinker, A. C.; Beaton, H. G.; Boughton–Smith, N.; Cook, T. R.; Cooper, S. L.;
Fraser–Rae, L.; Hasllam, K.; Hamley, P.; McInally, T.; Nicholls, D. J.; Pimm, A. D.;
Wallace, A. V. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 913.
6. (a) Yang, H.; Liu, Z. P.; Wallace, A. V.; Walpole, C.; J. Ducharme, J.; Projean,
D.; Srivastava, S.; Zhou, F.; Mackintosh, N.; Carpenter, K.; Perkins, M. N.;
Spriggs, S.; Åberg, A.; Lee, E. E.; Batey, R. A. unpublished results.; (b)
Walpole, C.; Yang, H. Preparation of spiro[piperidine-4,20(10H)-quinazoline]-
40-amines as nitric oxide synthase inhibitors.PCT Int. Appl.2001, 64 pp.WO
2001058867 A2.
7. For reviews on asymmetric fluorination reactions, see: (a) Lectard, S.;
Hamashima, Y.; Sodeoka, M. Adv. Syn. Catal. 2010, 352, 2708; (b) Ma, J.-A.;
Cahard, D. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1; (c) Prakash, G. K. S.; Beirer, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2172.
8. van Niel, M. B.; Collins, I.; Beer, M. S.; Broughton, H. B.; Cheng, S. K. F.;
Goodacre, S. C.; Heald, A.; Locker, K. L.; MacLeod, A. M.; Morrison, D.; Moyes, C.
R.; O’Connor, D.; Pike, A.; Rowley, M.; Russel, M. G. N.; Sohal, B.; Stanton, J. A.;
Thomas, S.; Verrier, H.; Watt, A. P.; Castro, L. J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42,
2087.
9. Liu, J.; Chan, J.; Bryant, C. M.; Duspara, P. A.; Lee, E. E.; Powell, D.; Yang, H.; Liu,
Z.; Walpole, C.; Roberts, E.; Batey, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2971.
10. The coupling of the benzamidine 5 and the optically pure 3-fluoropiperidine
ketones 4a and 4c in the presence of TMSOTf and triethylamine retained the
chirality of the fluorine-attached stereogenic centre. However, the fluorine-
attached stereogenic centre racemized during the cyclization reaction in the
presence of protic acid or Lewis acid.
11. DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-31G⁄, THF/ZPVE corrected) on the diastereoisomers
2a and 3a, reveal that the lowest energy conformations are A (2a) and B (3a)
respectively. Diastereoisomer A (2a) was found to be 3.3 kcal/mol lower in
energy than B (3a). In both cases the lowest energy conformations A and B
have the amidine group of the quinazoline ring adopting an axial orientation
on the piperidine ring. The conformation A (2a) is also the biologically relevant
conformation found in co-crystal structures of the inhibitor with the iNOS
enzyme (Ref.6a). The conformations (not shown) corresponding to the amidine
group of the quinazoline ring in an equatorial orientation were both found to
be 4.6 kcal/mol higher in energy than A (2a). This compares to a 1.3 kcal/mol
energy difference (B3LYP/6-31G⁄, THF/ZPVE corrected) between the
corresponding conformations of the unfluorinated analog of 2a:3a, the
lowest energy conformation also favoring an axially oriented amidine. The
lower energy of A (2a) compared to B (3a) may be due to electronic effects,
since there is a known preference of fluorine to adopt an axial orientation in 3-
fluoropiperidinium ring systems (5.4 kcal/mol), see: (a) Sum, A. M.; Lankin, D.
C.; Hardcastle, K.; Snyder, J. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1579.; (b) Lankin, D. C.;
Chandrakumar, N. S.; Shashidhar, N. R.; Spangler, D. P.; Snyder, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 3356.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. John Wei at Pharmaron and Prof. Stephen Hanes-
sian at the University of Montreal for helpful discussions.
References and notes
1. (a) Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37,
320; (b) Hagmann, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359; (c) Kirk, K. L. Org. Process