RSC Advances
Paper
Center. Samples were sealed in an Al-laminated packaging lm
and attached to a sample holder with Mn foil. Energy calibra-
tions were carried out using the rst peak of Mn foil (6539 eV) in
a derivative spectrum. Electrode samples were washed with
acetonitrile and dried in an Ar-lled glove box before sealing. X-
ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray
absorption ne structure (EXAFS) were analyzed by the Athena
and Artemis progrꢀam1 s.40 For the EXAFS analysis, the k-range of
Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Takashi Kyotani and Dr Yasuto Hoshikawa for
their supports about measurements of BET surface area. Parts
of this work were supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Research
Activity Start-up (Grant No. 17H06515) and ALCA-SPRING
(Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Develop-
ment Program-Specially Promoted Research for Innovative Next
Generation Batteries) from Japan Science and Technology
Agency (JST).
the FT was 3–14 A with a Hanning window of 1 Aꢀ1, and the
˚
˚
˚
radial distance range of the inverse FT was 1–3 A. Elemental
analyses were performed using inductively coupled plasma
atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on an Optima 3300XL
(PerkinElmer) and a CHN analyzer (Micro Corder JM10, J-
Science Lab Co., Ltd.). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were ob-
tained using JSM-7800F (JEOL) and EM-002B (Topcon), respec-
tively. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas were
measured by N2 adsorption at 77 K using BELSORP-mini
(MicrotracBEL).
Notes and references
1 J.-M. Tarascon and M. Armand, Nature, 2001, 414, 359–367.
2 P. G. Bruce, S. A. Freunberger, L. J. Hardwick and
J.-M. Tarascon, Nat. Mater., 2012, 11, 19–29.
3 R. Black, B. Adams and L. F. Nazar, Adv. Energy Mater., 2012,
2, 801–815.
Electrochemical measurements
MMO and MMO–G were mixed with acetylene black (AB;
Denka Black, FX-35, Denka Co., Ltd.) and polytetrauoro-
ethylene (PTFE; Teon, 6-J, DuPont-Mitsui Fluorochemicals
Co., Ltd.) at a weight ratio of 60/30/10 and 80/10/10, respec-
tively. In the MMO–G cathode, MMO/graphene/AB/PTFE ¼ 68/
12/10/10 by weight. These mixtures were cut into 8 mm
diameter disks of typically 2.5 mg and pressed on an Al mesh
current collector to serve as cathodes. For the anodes,
a nanoporous activated carbon (Maxsorb®, MSC-30, Kansai
Coke and Chemicals Co., Ltd.) was mixed with AB and PTFE at
a weight ratio of 8/1/1 and typically 15 mg of the mixture was
4 X. Ji and L. F. Nazar, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 9821–9826.
5 J. Muldoon, C. B. Bucur and T. Gregory, Chem. Rev., 2014,
114, 11683–11720.
6 J. Muldoon, C. B. Bucur and T. Gregory, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2017, 56, 12064–12084.
7 C. B. Bucur, T. Gregory, A. G. Oliver and J. Muldoon, J. Phys.
Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 3578–3591.
8 H. D. Yoo, I. Shterenberg, Y. Gofer, G. Gershinsky, N. Pour
and D. Aurbach, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 2265–2279.
9 R. Mohtadi and F. Mizuno, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2014, 5,
1291–1311.
pressed on a SUS 304 stainless steel mesh current collector. 10 E. Levi, M. D. Levi, O. Chasid and D. Aurbach, J.
The electrodes were dried at 160 ꢁC under vacuum and
Electroceram., 2009, 22, 13–19.
introduced into an Ar-lled glove box. For the electrolyte 11 M. Mao, T. Gao, S. Hou and C. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018,
solution, 0.5 M Mg(ClO4)2 (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 47, 8804–8841.
acetonitrile (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.) was prepared and 12 S. Okamoto, T. Ichitsubo, T. Kawaguchi, Y. Kumagai, F. Oba,
stored over molecular sieves. The cathode, the anode, and the
electrolyte were assembled in a three-electrode cell (EC
S. Yagi, K. Shimokawa, N. Goto, T. Doi and E. Matsubara,
Adv. Sci., 2015, 2, 1500072.
Frontier Co., Ltd.) with an Ag/Ag+ reference electrode or 13 H. Kurihara, T. Yajima and S. Suzuki, Chem. Lett., 2008, 37,
a 2032 coin-type cell (Hohsen Corp.) with a glass-ber sepa-
rator (GA-55, Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd.). The amount of the 14 N. N. Sinha and N. Munichandraiah, Electrochem. Solid-State
electrolyte was 2 mL with the three-electrode cell and 0.1 mL Lett., 2008, 11, F23–F26.
with the coin-type cell, respectively. For the reference elec- 15 M. F. Rahman and D. Gerosa, Optoelectron. Adv. Mater.,
trode, a double junction reference electrode was used with Rapid Commun., 2015, 9, 1204–1207.
internal 0.01 M AgNO3 + 0.1 M n-Bu4NClO4 solution in 16 M. Cabello, R. Alcantara, F. Nacimiento, G. Ortiz, P. Lavela
acetonitrile separated by porous glasses. The aforementioned and J. L. Tirado, CrystEngComm, 2015, 17, 8728–8735.
376–377.
´
cell preparations were conducted in an Ar-ꢁlled glove box. 17 Z. Feng, X. Chen, L. Qiao, A. L. Lipson, T. T. Fister, L. Zeng,
Charge/discharge tests were carried out at 25 C in constant-
C. Kim, T. Yi, N. Sa, D. L. Proffit, A. K. Burrell, J. Cabana,
B. J. Ingram, M. D. Biegalski, M. J. Bedzyk and P. Fenter,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 28438–28443.
current (CC) mode using
a multi-channel potentiostat
system (VMP3, Bio-Logic Science Instruments) or a battery
test system (HJ-1001SD8, Hokuto Denko Corp.). The specic 18 J. Yin, A. B. Brady, E. S. Takeuchi, A. C. Marschilok and
capacity and the current density were calculated on the basis K. J. Takeuchi, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 3665–3668.
of the weight of MMO in the electrode. Caution: anhydrous 19 Q. D. Truong, M. K. Devaraju, P. D. Tran, Y. Gambe,
perchlorate salts are potentially explosive and should be
handled with appropriate care.
K. Nayuki, Y. Sasaki and I. Honma, Chem. Mater., 2017, 29,
6245–6251.
36438 | RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 36434–36439
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019