Organic Letters
Letter
system.14 Although a number of asymmetric studies on such a
cooperative regime have been developed upon the cross-
couplings, especially with nickel, they are largely limited to
redox-neutral reactions.15 The dual nickel/photoredox-cata-
lyzed asymmetric reductive cross-coupling is still much less
observed.16 Recently, by this strategy, we demonstrated an
enantioselective RCC of aryl iodides with α-chloroboranes
under exceptionally mild conditions.10b Herein we would like
to facilitate this route further to create chiral CF3-bearing
molecules.
Initial exploration into this dual Ni/photoredox-catalyzed
process focused on using 1a as the sp2-hybridized electrophile
and racemic CF3-containing precursor 2a as another partner.
After a systematic evaluation of all of the reaction parameters,
product 3a was concertedly afforded in high yield with good
enantioselectivity under the conditions listed in entry 1 of
Table 1. The change of nickel catalyst to Ni(cod)2 or NiI2 led
to a lower yield but had no distinct influence on the
enantioselectivity (entries 2 and 3, Table 1). The ligand with
CF3 substitution on the aryl group (L2) gave only the product
with a decreased yield, highlighting the importance of the
electron property of the ligand (entry 4, Table 1). A higher
yield was observed but a lower enantioselectivity was given
with a dual chiral center ligand L3, whereas the popular
bis(oxazolines) ligand L4 afforded the benzyl CF3 product in
an obviously diminished yield (entries 5 and 6, Table 1). Other
photoredox catalysts only gave lower conversions (entries 7
and 8, Table 1). The further examination of several solvents
confirmed the best outcome with CPME (entries 9 and 10,
Table 1). The same conclusion regarding the Et3N selection
was also deduced after systematic tests with organic or
inorganic bases (entries 11 and 12, Table 1). Control
experiments in the absence of Hantzsch ester (HEH), Et3N,
nickel catalyst, photoredox 4CzIPN, or light resulted in no
detectable product formation (entries 13 and 14, Table 1),
strengthening the essential role of each of these components in
this asymmetric reductive cross-coupling process.
With the optimized conditions in hand, we investigated the
scopes of this dual nickel/photoredox-catalyzed reductive
cross-coupling (Scheme 2). In general, the aryl iodides with
either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing functional
groups on the meta and para positions can react smoothly to
give the corresponding products in moderate to high yields
with good enantioselectivities. The aryl bromide can also be
utilized as a partner to give the product in the same enantiomer
ratio and a bit lower yield (3a). A variety of versatile functional
groups that have great potential in the further transformation,
such as nitrile (3a), ester (3b), aldehyde (3c), and ketone (3d,
3e), were well tolerated in this RCC process. The sulfur-
containing group including thioether (3f) and sulfone (3g) in
the benzene ring did not influence the high yields and
enantioselectivities. The aryl iodides bearing an ether on the
para position could give the corresponding product without a
significant reduction in yield but a decreased er value (3h),
thus giving some insights into the electronic effect on this
transformation. In addition, the substrates processing a meta
substituent (3i−3l) as well as the multiple substituted
candidates (3m, 3n) can be employed to afford the chiral
CF3-containing products in undiminished yields and selectiv-
ity. When moving to the heterocyclic iodides, in an effort to
showcase the mild nature of this method, the reactions still
readily proceeded under the optimized conditions (3o, 3p).
Then, the method was applied to the α-trifluoromethyl
bromides for a further study of the scope of this dual-catalytic
regime (3q−3z). Identically, a diverse set of functional groups,
including ester (3q, 3r, 3u), amide (3s), alcohol (3t), alkyl
(3v), ether (3w), protected phenol (3x), thiazole (3y), and
ferrocene (3z), were tolerated. These results serve to highlight
the broad scope and high chemoselectivity of the current
method.
a
Table 1. Optimization Conditions
entry
changes
yield (%)
er
93:7
b
1
no change
82
2
using Ni(cod)2
45
93:7
3
using NiI2
50
91:9
4
5
L2 instead of L1
L3 instead of L1
6
98
88.5:11.5
91:9
6
L4 instead of L1
38
95:5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
[Ir(dFCF3ppy)dtbbpy]PF6 as PC
Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O as PC
TBME as solvent
46
n.d.
82
20
14
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
93:7
To further illustrate the utility of this method, this dual
nickel/photoredox-catalyzed reductive cross-coupling was
applied for the rapid, late-stage modification of natural
products and drug molecules, which typically requires mild
reaction conditions and high functional-group tolerance. Aryl
iodides derived from drugs such as clofibrate (3aa) and
aniracetam (3bb) were transformed into the corresponding
chiral CF3-containing products with this strategy. The alkyl
bromides or aryl iodides bearing multiple stereocenters, such
as 3cc, a chiral L-menthol derivative, and 3dd, a steroidal
framework, were all amenable for this process. In addition, the
components (3ee−3gg) with an indomethacin skeleton
underwent smooth transformations as well. The successful
late-stage functionalization of these natural products and drugs,
many of which contain sensitive ester, amide, aryl chloride, and
92.5:7.5
94:6
92.5:7.5
DMA as solvent
DIPEA instead of Et3N
Na2CO3 instead of Et3N
no HEH/Et3N
no Ni/4CzIPN/light
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), NiBr2(DME)
(10 mol %), L1 (12 mol %), 4CzIPN (1 mol %), HEH (2 equiv),
Et3N (5 equiv), CPME (2 mL), blue LED lamp (30 W), room
temperature, 8−10 h. The yields were determined by GC with
ndodecane as an internal standard. The enantiomer ratio (er) values
b
were determined by HPLC. 75% isolated yield. CPME, cyclopentyl
t
methyl ether. TBME, butyl methyl ether. DIPEA, N,N-diisopropy-
lethylamine.
4684
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4683−4687