Organic Nanoparticles via G-Quadruplex Self-Assembly
A R T I C L E S
Self-Assembly in the Absence of Cations. Solution Experi-
ments. Among the natural nucleobases, guanosine certainly
occupies a central role due to its versatile supramolecular
chemistry. The G base offers a rich array of hydrogen-bonding
donor and acceptor groups that has been exploited both by nature
and by synthetic chemists to build diverse supramolecular
architectures.13 In the absence of some specific additives
(alkaline cations, cytosine derivatives, ...) guanine tends to self-
associate into multiple oligomeric species by formation of pairs
of self-complementary hydrogen bonds (some representative
examples are shown in Figure 2a). Depending on the participat-
ing hydrogen bonds, the resulting oligomers can be linear
(ribbons) or circular (quartets). Although in some conditions
the formation of empty quartets31 or a particular kind of ribbon20
is favored in concentrated samples (principally due to steric
effects), the weak nature of these pairs of hydrogen bonds
typically produces a complex mixture of loosely bound, rapidly
exchanging oligomeric species in dilute nonpolar solutions at
room temperature.
The preparation of bromoguanines G1, G2, and 5 required
two different synthetic routes (Scheme 1a). Bromoguanosines
G1 and G216 were prepared from guanosine Via protection of
the diol moiety as an acetonide,21 bromination at the 8-position
of the guanine in the presence of NBS,22 and functionalization
of the 5′-OH in the ribose with a tert-butyldimethylsilyl14a,23
(G1) or a decanoyl24 (G2) group. Compound 5 was in contrast
prepared from commercial 2-amino-6-chloropurine by an N-
alkylation reaction25 with (-)-2-octyl-p-toluenesulfonate (3),26
followed by hydrolysis25 and subsequent bromination at the
8-position.22 Compound 5 was then transformed to the 8-ethynyl
derivative G3 by Sonogashira coupling27 with triisopropylsilyl
acetylene and deprotection of the silyl group in the presence of
tetrabutylammonium fluoride.
The synthesis of the conjugated OPV core (Scheme 1b)
started from dialdehyde 6,28 which was subjected to a
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction, first with 1.1 equiv of
phosphonate 729 and then with either commercial phosphonate
8 or with tridodecyloxy-phosphonate 9.30 This procedure led
to the corresponding unsymmetrically substituted iodo-OPVs
10 and 11 in acceptable yields. Ethynyl derivatives 12 and 13
were then synthesized from 10 and 11, respectively, by
Sonogashira coupling with triisopropylsilyl acetylene and
subsequent deprotection of the silyl group.
Our OPV-G compounds are quite soluble in solvents of
medium-low polarity such as THF, CHCl3, CH2Cl2, or toluene
and, in the case of OPV-G2 and OPV-G3, in apolar solvents
such as methylcyclohexane or dodecane. 1H NMR experiments
in such solvents indicate that, like their guanosine precursors,16
these OPV-G molecules self-associate in a mixture of oligomeric
species in the absence of alkaline cations. The degree of self-
association is clearly evidenced in the amide (NH) and amine
(NH2) proton signals, which shift downfield when decreasing
the solvent polarity (Figure S1), the temperature (Figure 2b),
or when increasing the concentration, as a result of a higher
participation in hydrogen-bonding. At the same time, ESI
Q-TOF MS analysis of CHCl3 solutions of OPV-G1 showed
several peaks that correspond to cluster ions of the general
The final key step, the coupling of the chromophore and base
units (Scheme 1c), was carried out using a copper-free Sono-
gashira procedure27 in the presence of catalytic amounts of
Pd(PPh3)4 and under strictly oxygen-free conditions, to minimize
the formation of the corresponding homocoupling products. The
formation of these diacetylene byproducts was still quite difficult
to avoid for alkoxy-OPV 13, especially when the coupling was
performed with the rather insoluble bromoguanine 5. Therefore,
the coupling strategy was inverted for OPV-G3, with the
reaction between ethynyl-guanine G3 and iodo-OPV 11 leading
to higher yields. All compounds were purified and characterized
by 1H and 13C NMR techniques, mass spectrometry, and
UV-vis and IR spectroscopies (see the Supporting Information).
formula [OPV-G1n+Hx(+Nay)](x+y)+
.
Compound OPV-G3, which bears a guanine substituent,
clearly exhibits a much higher tendency to self-associate than
compounds OPV-G1 or OPV-G2, substituted with a guanosine
derivative. For instance, 10-2 M solutions of OPV-G3 in
CDCl2CDCl2, or in more apolar solvents like toluene-d8 or
cyclohexane-d12, display the aforementioned downfield shift of
the NH and NH2 proton signals and a very pronounced
broadening of all proton signals (Figure S2), which is attributed
to the formation of ribbon-like aggregates. Such aggregation is
prevented in CDCl2CDCl2 at high temperatures (>50 °C), upon
addition of small amounts of CD3OD, or using more polar
solvents, such as THF-d8 (Figure S2). On the contrary,
compounds OPV-G1 or OPV-G2 display in general much
(20) (a) Gottarelli, G.; Masiero, S.; Mezzina, E.; Pieraccini, S.; Rabe, J. P.;
Samor`ı, P.; Spada, G. P. Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6, 3242–3248. (b)
Giorgi, T.; Grepioni, F.; Manet, I.; Mariani, P.; Masiero, S.; Mezzina,
E.; Pieraccini, S.; Saturni, L.; Spada, G. P.; Gottarelli, G. Chem.sEur.
J. 2002, 8, 2143–2152. (c) Lena, S.; Brancolini, G.; Gottarelli, G.;
Mariani, P.; Masiero, S.; Venturini, A.; Palermo, V.; Pandoli, O.;
Pieraccini, S.; Samor`ı, P.; Sapada, G. P. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
3757–3764.
(21) Zhang, B.; Cui, Z.; Sun, L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 275–278.
(22) Amer, M. S.; Amer, A. M.; Ahmed, A. F. S.; Farouk, W. M. Indian
J. Chem., Sect. B 2001, 40B, 382–385.
1
sharper features in the H NMR spectra, indicating a lower
degree of aggregation. In agreement with this interpretation,
DOSY experiments at 25 °C yielded comparable diffusion
values for OPV-G1 or OPV-G2 10-2 M CDCl3 solutions (D
) (6.91 ( 0.05) × 10-10 m2 s-1 and (6.42 ( 0.04) × 10-10 m2
s-1, respectively), whereas somewhat lower values were ob-
served for OPV-G3 under the same conditions (D ) (3.89 (
0.09) × 10-10 m2 s-1).
(23) Kaucher, M. S.; Davis, J. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6381–6384.
(24) Manet, I.; Francini, L.; Masiero, S.; Pieraccini, S.; Spada, G. P.;
Gottarelli, G. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2096–2107.
(25) (a) Norman, T. C.; Gray, N. S.; Koh, J. T.; Schultz, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 7430–7431. (b) ElHa¨ık, J.; Pask, C. M.; Kilner, C. A.;
Halcrow, M. A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 291–298.
(26) (a) Catalano, D.; Chiezzi, L.; Domenici, V.; Geppi, M.; Veracini, C. A.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 10104–10113. (b) Elha¨ık, J.; Pask, C. M.;
Kilner, C. A.; Halcrow, M. A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 291–298.
(27) Chinchilla, R.; Nájera, C. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 874–922.
(28) Kuhnert, N.; Lo´pez-Periago, A.; Rossignolo, G. M. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2005, 3, 524–537.
The lower tendency of OPV-G1 or OPV-G2 to form
oligomeric aggregates, when compared to OPV-G3, is attributed
to the larger steric volume of the ribose substituent. It is known
that, in the case of 8-substituted guanosines, the ribose unit is
forced to adopt a syn conformation, which prevents the
(29) Xiao, J.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Cui, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2656–2660.
(30) (a) Jonkheijm, P.; Fransen, M.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Meijer, E. W.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1280–1286. (b) Figueira-Duarte,
T. M.; Clifford, J.; Amendola, V.; Gegout, A.; Olivier, J.; Cardinali,
F.; Meneghetti, M.; Armaroli, N.; Nierengarten, J.-F. Chem. Commun.
2006, 2054–2056.
(31) Sessler, J. L.; Sathiosatham, M.; Doerr, K.; Lynch, V.; Abboud, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1300–1303.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 13, 2010 4713