In addition, the modification of C-22 of vindoline was also
carried out by a multi-step process (Scheme 2). Vindoline was
reducted by LiAlH in THF to afford 13 in 91% yield, then 13
were evaluated their GSIS activities on MIN6 cell line. The
1
results indicate that both ester group and size of R on C4 played
4
a key role to keep the activities. The reduction of double bond of
C-6 and C-7 led to the activity decreased. As for the ester and
was esterified to form 14 and 15, or etherified to form 16–20.
Furthermore, anino substituted derivatives were also synthesized
as shown in Scheme 4. Epoxy intermediate 21 was formed from
3
4
ether derivatives on C-22, the size of R or R also have a
significant impact on GSIS activities. In addition, the activities
are improved for those compound with amide substituted
derivatives on C-22. Among all compounds, 4, 8, 17 and 24 show
good GSIS activities, which were about 4.5-fold more potent
than vindoline.
1
3 in the presence of TsCl in THF in 80% yield. Then ring
opening reaction of 19 with NaN3 resulted in the formation of
the azide, which was reduced by LiAlH to give 20 in 75% yield.
Further acylation reaction of 22 was carried out to give 23–26
4
(
63–72%).
Then, we evaluated the GSIS activities of these compounds on
MIN6 cell line, and the results are presented in Table 1. The EC50
values of vindoline and C-4 deacetyl vindoline (2) were 50.2 µΜ
and >100 µΜ, respectively. This result clearly indicated that C-4
ester group was important to keep the activities. Therefore,
several C-4 ester group derivatives 3–6 were synthesized, and the
EC50 values of these compounds ranged from 10.4 to 80.5 µΜ.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant: 81273397).
References and notes
1
1
The GSIS activities of 3 (R = ethyl) and 4 (R = i-propyl) were
increased greatly compared with vindoline. On the contrary, the
1. (a) Schwarz, P. E. H.; Gallein, G.; Ebermann, D.; Muller, A.;
Lindner, A.; Rothe, U.; Nebel, I. T.; Muller, G. Diabetes Res.
Clin. Pract. 2013, 100, 11; (b) Seo, W.-D.; Lee, J. H.; Jia, Y.; Wu,
C.; Lee, S.-J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5237; (c)
Bloomgarden, Z. T. Diabetes Care 1996, 19, 295. (d) Wild, S.;
Roglic, G.; Green, A.; Sicree, R.; King, H. Diabetes Care 2004,
1
activities of 5 (R = cyclohexyl) and 6 (R = phenyl) were
1
1
decreased. These results revealed that increasing the group of R
properly was favorable for increased activities, however,
the large steric hindrance group was unfavorable.
27, 1047.
Porte, D. Jr. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2001, 17, 181.
2
3
.
.
Zareba G.; Serradell N.; Castaner R.; Davies S. L.; Prous J.;
Mealy N. Drug Future 2005, 30, 1253.
Table 1
GSIS activities of vindoline derivatives on MIN6 cell line.
4
.
(a) Passarella, D.; Giardini, A.; Peretto, B.; Fontana, G.; Sacchetti,
A.; Silvani, A.; Ronchi, C.; Cappelletti, G.; Cartelli, D. Borlake,
J.; Danielia, B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6269; (b) Nammi,
S.; Boini, M. K.; Lodagala, S. D.; Behara, R. B. S. BMC Comp.
Altern. Med. 2003, 3, 4; (c) Rasineni, K.; Bellamkonda, R.;
Singareddy,S. R.; Desireddy, S. Pharmacogn. Res. 2010, 2, 195.
Mangeney, P.; Andriamialisoa, R. Z.; Langlois, N.; Langlois, Y.;
Potier, P. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3765.
Compound
EC50 (µΜ)
50.2 ± 3.4
>100
Compound
EC50 (µΜ)
51.0 ± 3.9
>100
vindoline
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
26
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
32.6 ± 2.6
10.4 ± 0.6
80.5 ± 9.2
62.2 ± 4.4
38.5 ± 2.5
14.2 ± 0.6
>100
41.0 ± 3.5
11.0 ± 1.0
41.5 ± 3.0
>100
5
6
.
.
(a) Etievant, C.; Barret, J.-M.; Krucznski, A.; Perrin, D.; Hill, B.
T. Invest. New Drug. 1998, 16, 3; (b) Langlois, N.; Gueritte, F.;
Langlois, Y.; Potier, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 505.
(a) Fahy, J.; Duflos, A.; Ribet, J. P.; Jacquesy, J. C.; Berrier, C.;
Jouannetaud, M. P.; Zunino, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 118,
7
8
.
.
14.2 ± 1.1
19.3 ± 1.4
12.7 ± 0.7
21.0 ± 1.8
18.5 ± 2.0
8576; (b) Bellmunt, J.; Delgado, F.-M.; George, C. Semin. Oncol.
2008, 35, S34.
Yao, X.; Chen, F.; Li, P.; Quan, L.; Chen, J.; Yu, L.; Ding, H.; Li,
C.; Chen, L.; Gao, Z.; Wan, P.; Hu, L.; Jiang, H.; Shen, X. J.
Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 150, 285.
1
1
1
0
1
2
62.2 ± 4.6
64.3 ± 4.3
>100
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, spectral data
and biological assay methods) associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at
Then, compounds 3 and 4 were chosen to investigate the
effect of C-6 and C-7 double bond on activity. The EC50 values
of 7 (38.5 µΜ) and 8 (14.2 µΜ) showed that the reduction of
double bond led to the activity decreased. Furthermore, C-4 ether
derivatives 9–12 were also synthesized, and activity test showed
low activities (EC50 > 62.2 µΜ).
In addition, several ester and ether derivatives on C-22 (14–20)
were synthesized. As shown in Table 1, 17 showed more potent
GSIS activities on MIN6 cell line with the EC50 value of 11.0 µM,
which was 4.5-fold more potent than vindoline. The EC50 values
of 14–20 demonstrated that the activities were decreased
3
4
significantly with the increase of group (R or R ). Furthermore,
amide substituted derivatives on C-22 (23–26) showed good
activities with the EC50 value of 19.3, 12.7, 21.0 and 18.5 µM,
respectively.
In conclusion, we have synthesized a series of vindoline
derivatives on C-4, C-6, C-7 and C-22. All of these compounds