3-Bromozinc Propenyl Esters
TABLE 1. Zinc-Mediated Grignard Route to Alk-1-en-3,4-diols 6a
SCHEME 1
6 yieldb
entry
RCHO
(%)
syn-6/anti-6
1
2
3
1a (R ) Ph)
1b (R ) i-Pr)
1c (R ) c-C6H11)
70
71
72
50:50
10:90
10:90
High levels of simple diastereoselectivity in the reaction of
2 with prochiral aldehydes are often achieved; in these cases,
preferential formation of syn or anti adducts 3 can be anticipated
on the basis of two general trends. Allylic boranes and boronates
are representative of allylic organometallics which afford syn
or anti adducts as a function of the carbon-carbon double bond
configuration. Chair-like Zimmermann-Traxler transition states
(TS) offer a rationale to the diastereoselective formation of syn
adducts 3 starting from (Z)-2, while the E-configured ones afford
anti-2. A second family of complexes 2, typically stannanes3
and chromium complexes,5 stereoconverge either to syn or anti
products, independently of the CdC bond configuration, the
stereopreference being dictated by the metal only. The stereo-
convergence is rationalized in terms of the open-chain TS in
the case of stannanes and in terms of a rapid fluxional
equilibration between (Z)-2 and (E)-2 in the case of chromium
complexes. The latter species produce anti adducts via cyclic
TS involving the kinetically more reactive (E)-2 complexes.
We recently proposed to the attention of synthetic chemists
a new family of ester-substituted allyl organometallics 5, derived
from the insertion of Zn(0), In(0), and Cr(II) into the carbon-
halogen bond of 3-halopropenyl esters 4 (Scheme 2).6 The
versatility of 5 was confirmed both by Petrini and co-workers,7
who exploited 5 (M ) Zn) in a synthesis of anti-4-aminoalk-
1-en-3-ols, and by Palmelund and Madsen, who used 5 (M )
In) as a two-carbon homologating agent for the preparation of
higher sugars.8
a The following molar ratios were used: zinc/4a/aldehyde ) 2:1.5:1.
b Isolated yields after flash chromatography on SiO2.
conjugated and aromatic aldehydes, and an anti adduct when
they add to saturated aldehydes. Here a combined experimental-
theoretical approach aimed at shedding light on factors control-
ling the stereochemical outcome of the addition of 5 to prochiral
aldehydes is presented.
Results and Discussion
Experimental Studies. To meet theoretical feasibility and
accuracy requirements, we selected among various esters 4,
3-bromopropenyl acetate 4a (R ) CH3, X ) Br) as substrate
for our model reaction, and zinc as the metal. The experimental
plan involved the investigation of the reaction of 4a with zinc
in the presence of three model aldehydes representative of
conjugated and saturated aldehydes, namely, benzaldehyde (1a,
R ) Ph) on one hand and 2-methylpropanal (1b, R ) i-Pr) and
cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde (1c, R ) c-C6H11) on the other.
Compound 4a was used as a 65:35 Z/E isomer mixture, as
obtained by distillation after the addition of acetyl bromide to
acrolein.10 For the model reaction, the solvent used was THF
(replaced by dimethylether in silico), and the reactions were
run according to a two-step Grignard protocol involving
formation of the organometallic species followed by the addition
of the aldehyde. To determine the diastereomeric composition,
the reaction mixtures were hydrolyzed with K2CO3 in 4:1
MeOH/H2O in order to free the known alk-1-en-3,4-diols 6
(Scheme 3).
SCHEME 2
SCHEME 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (i) Zn, THF, 0 °C f 20 °C, 2 h; (ii) RCHO,
20 °C, 2 h; (iii) KB2CO3 (3 equiv), CH3OH/H2O (4:1 v/v), 20 °C, 2 h.
Complexes 5 (M ) Zn and In; R ) CH3), as well as the
corresponding carbonates (R ) MeO) more recently developed
in our lab,9 display a unique behavior when reacted with simple
prochiral aldehydes: they preferentially afford syn adducts with
The results obtained in this set of reactions are collected in
Table 1. Under these conditions, 80% de values were obtained
with both saturated aldehydes in favor of anti-6 (Table 1, entries
2 and 3), meaning that the energy difference ∆∆Eq between
(4) Yamamoto, Y.; Asao, N. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2207-2293.
(5) Fu¨rstner, A.; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12349-12357.
(6) (a) Lombardo, M.; Girotti, R.; Morganti, S.; Trombini, C. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 2981-2983. (b) Lombardo, M.; Girotti, R.; Morganti, S.; Trombini,
C. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2310-2311. (c) Lombardo, M.; Licciulli, S.;
Morganti, S.; Trombini, C. Synlett 2003, 43-46. (d) Lombardo, M.;
Morganti, S.; Trombini, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 997-1006. (e)
Lombardo, M.; d’Ambrosio, F.; Morganti, S.; Trombini, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 2823-2826. (f) Lombardo, M.; Licciulli, S.; Morganti, S.;
Trombini, C. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1762-1763. (g) Lombardo, M.;
Licciulli, S.; Trombini, C. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 657-669. (h)
Lombardo, M.; Gianotti, K.; Licciulli, S.; Trombini, C. Tetrahedron 2004,
60, 11725-11732. (i) Lombardo, M.; Licciulli, S.; Rispoli, G.; Trombini,
C.; Dhavale, D. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3789-3792.
the two diastereomorphic TS is in the range of ∼0.5 kcal mol-1
.
On the other hand, perfectly degenerate diastereomorphic TS
are involved in the reaction of 4a with benzaldehyde, given
that a 1:1 syn/anti ratio was observed (Table 1, run 1).
It is worthy to note the minor but not negligible role played
by the metal/solvent pair in stereoselectivity, particularly, in
determining the syn/anti ratio with the aromatic aldehyde.
(9) (a) Lombardo, M.; Pasi, F.; Tiberi, C.; Trombini, C. Synthesis (Special
Topic) 2005, 2609-2614. (b) Lombardo, M.; Pasi, F.; Trombini, C. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3061. (c) Lombardo, M.; Capdevila, M. G.; Pasi, F.;
Trombini, C. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3303.
(10) (a) Ulich, L. H.; Adams, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1921, 45, 660-667.
(b) Neuenschwander, M.; Bigler, P.; Christen, K.; Iseli, R.; Kyburz, R.;
Mu¨hle, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 2047-2058.
(7) (a) Petrini, M.; Profeta, R.; Righi, P. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4530.
(b) Giri, N.; Petrini, M.; Profeta, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7303.
(8) (a) Palmelund, A.; Madsen, R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8248-8251.
(b) Keinicke, L.; Fristrup, P.; Norrby, P.-O.; Madsen, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 15756-15761.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2008 419