the formation of the bromonium cation B from the singlet
aryl cation A was fast enough to compete with the reaction
between the A and a nucleophile (or solvent). Entry 1 in
Table 1 describes the solvolysis reaction of diazonium ion
in methanol.13 Because bromonium cation B gave pro-
ducts with complete racemization and singlet aryl cation
A gave products with retention of configuration, we con-
clude that, when methanol was in large excess, the relative
rate could be evaluated as rB/rX = kB ꢁ [A]/kX ꢁ [A] ꢁ
[MeOH] = kB/kX ꢁ [MeOH] = [racemic]/[excess] =
2[change]/[retention ꢀ change] = 1.01, where rB is the rate
of formation of bromonium cation B and rX is the rate of
reaction between singlet aryl cation A and methanol, while
kB and kX are the corresponding rate constants. Thus,
Table 1. Dediazoniation Reaction of 2a with Different Reagents
er (retention/ yieldb
entry solvent
reagent
product X
change)a
(%)
1
2
MeOH
DMSO
Ac2O
4, OMe
5, OH
6, OAc
7, H
74.9:25.1c
73.0:27.0
72.5:27.5
99.7:0.3
99.2:0.8
97.7:2.3d
98.6:1.4
91.5:8.5
81.9:8.1
55.6:44.4
55.1:44.9
93.2:6.8
80
84
65
61
53
76
87
85
71
55
60
52
the relative rate constant could be evaluated as kB/kX
≈
H2O
kB/kdiff = 1.01 ꢁ [MeOH] = 24.8 M at room temperature.
Substitution of the value of kdiff gives the absolute rate
constant kB as 2.48 ꢁ 1011 sꢀ1 at room temperature. The
formation of the bromonium cation B is a unimolecular
reaction, whose reaction rate (rB) is almost the same as that
of the reaction between singlet aryl cation A and methanol
(rX). So it displays high sensitivity to the singlet aryl cation A.
Moreover, as the stability of bromonium cation B is much
higher than that of singlet aryl cation A, it is expected that the
former could selectively react with different nucleophiles
while the latter could not. To summarize, the racemization
caused by bromonium cation B could act as a mechanistic
probe for the reaction leading to the singlet aryl cation.
Inorder tocheck the probe, we carried out anotherseries
of experiments (Table 1, entries 7ꢀ12). The iododediazonia-
tion reaction has been exploited for a considerable length
of time and a number of workers have proposed that the
iododediazoniation reaction proceeds through a free radical
mechanism.14 However, our results showed that the me-
chanism of the iododediazoniation reaction was not a simple
radical process but a complex blended process which was
determined by the reaction conditions. For example, under
the reaction conditions of entries 7 and 8 in Table 1, a radical
process was the predominant mechanism. A small amount
of optically pure (Sp)-2a underwent a heterolytic cleavage
through bromonium cation B to give a racemic product.
When (Sp)-2a was treated with an aqueous solution of KI
(Table 1, entry 9), the product 10 was 36% racemized. This
further confirms that the iododediazoniation reaction pro-
ceeds by two mechanisms including heterolytic and hemo-
lytic cleavage processes. When (Sp)-2a was treated with
hydroiodic acid (Table 1, entry 10), the degree of racemiza-
tion was nearly 90%, that is, a heterolytic cleavage process
was the predominant mechanism. Interestingly, the copro-
duct 5 obtained in high optical purity (er value of 93.5: 6.5 in
35% yield) indicated that the singlet aryl cation combined
mainly with water instead of hydroiodic acid. On the other
hand, the results also showed that the bromonium cation B
could selectively react with the stronger nucleophile (HI)
rather than the solvent molecule (H2O).
3
AcOH
AcONa
PhSNa
NaN3
KI
4
MeOH
DMSO
DMSO
CH3CN
CH3CN
H2O
5
8, SPh
9, N3
6
7
10, I
8
KI þ I2
KI
10, I
9
10, I
10, Ie
10
11
12
H2O
HI
CH3CN
DMSO
KSCN
KSCNþ
CuSCN
11, SCN
11, SCN
a Enantiomeric ratio was determined by chiral HPLC analysis
(Chiralpak IA column). b Isolated yield. c Compound 4 was transformed
to 5 for HPLC analysis (see the Supporting Information). d Compound 9
was transformed to 1a for HPLC analysis (see the Supporting Information).
e The coproduct was 5 with an er value of 93.5:6.5 in 35% yield.
sodium benzenethiolate in DMSO, undergoing a free radi-
cal mechanism (SRN1 reaction), afforded 13-benzene-
sulfenyl-4-bromo[2.2]paracyclophane 8 (Table 1, entry 5).9
Entry 6 in Table 1 is the dediazoniation with sodium azide
inDMSOwhich occurredthrough attack ofthe azide upon
the diazonium ion with formation of aryl pentazole and its
subsequent product 9.10 None of these products racemized
remarkably (Table 1 entries 4ꢀ6). We can conclude that reac-
tions that undergo CꢀN bond breakage through a hetero-
lytic cleavage process give products with partial racemization,
and reactions that occur by a hemolytic cleavage process
or a cyclic concerted process give products with retention of
configuration (Scheme 2).
It has been known for some time that the singlet aryl
cation is a short-lived species which is unselectively cap-
tured by a nucleophile or a solvent molecule at a diffusion-
controlled rate (its reaction rate constant kX ≈ kdiff ≈ 1 ꢁ
1010 Mꢀ1 ꢀ1).11 However, it is uncertain whether the
s
excessive reactivity of this species allowed it to be consid-
ered an intermediate in thermal reactions.12 Fortunately,
(8) DeTar, D. F.; Turetzky, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 3925.
(9) Petrillo, G.; Novi, M.; Garbarino, G.; Dell’Erba, C. Tetrahedron
1986, 42, 4007.
€
(10) Brase, S.; Gil, C.; Knepper, K.; Zimmermann, V. Angew.Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5188.
(11) Dichiarante, V.; Fagnoni, M.; Albini, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
1282.
(12) Glaser, R.; Horan, C. J.; Lewis, M.; Zollinger, H. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 902.
(13) DeTar, D. F.; Turetzky, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1745.
(14) Abeywickrema, A. N.; Beckwith, A. L. J. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
2568.
5438
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 21, 2012