Molecules 2018, 23, 640
7 of 10
5
1
.83 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 2.90–2.98 (m, 4H). 13C-NMR (500MHz, CDCl3):
28.33, 128.27, 126.1, 41.2, 29.8.
δ
199.8, 141.0, 136.5, 128.5,
3
.2.7. (E)-6-(4-Oxo-6-phenylhex-2-enyl)-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one (1)
Under nitrogen atmosphere, Grubbs’ (II) catalyst (15 mg, 5 mol %) was added to a stirred
solution of 6-allyl-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one
2
(50 mg, 0.36 mmol) and 5-phenylpent-1-en-3-one
◦
3
(174 mg, 1.1 mmol) in dry CH Cl (10 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at 45 C for 12 h.
2
2
After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated to dryness and the residue was purified
using silica gel chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, v/v, 4/1) to afford
1 with 75% isolated yield (73 mg).
1
H-NMR (500 MHz; CDCl ; Me Si):
δ 7.26–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.17–7.20 (m, 3H), 6.86–6.90 (m, 1H), 6.77–6.83
3
4
(
2
m, 1H), 6.19 (d, J = 15.9 Hz), 6.04 (dt, J = 9.8 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.57 (m, 1H),2.88–2.96 (m, 4H),
1 2
.58–2.70 (m, 2H), 2.32–2.34 (m, 2H). C-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 199.0, 163.7, 144.6, 141.0, 140.0,
13
1
33.5, 128.5, 128.4, 126.1, 121.5, 76.0, 41.7, 37.5, 29.9, 28.9.
3
.3. General Procedure for Enzymatic Reductions
The reductions were performed as follows: In a phosphate buffered solution (1 mL, 200 mM,
pH 6.9), the substrate (5 mg, 0.035 mmol), the corresponding Kred (2 mg), glucose (21 mg), glucose
dehydrogenase (2 mg), and NADPH (2 mg, 2.5 mM) were added. The reactions were incubated at
◦
3
–8 C. After completion of the reactions, the products were isolated by extracting the crude reaction
mixture with EtOAc (3
to dryness.
×
1.5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO and evaporated
4
(
S)-Methyl 3-hydroxyhex-5-enoate, (S)-8
The enzymatic reduction of methyl 3-oxohex-5-enoate
7
catalyzed by Kred-119 was completed
after 3 h and the optically active alcohol
data are identical to those of compound 8. H-NMR (500 MHz; CDCl ; Me Si):
8
was produced with 79% yield and > 99% ee. The spectroscopic
1
δ 5.78–5.86
3
4
(
m, 1H), 5.13–5.16 (m, 1H), 5.11–5.12 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.12 (m, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.53 (dd, J = 16.6 Hz,
1
13
J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (dd, J = 16.6 Hz, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 2.23–2.33 (m, 2H). C-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
2
1
2
δ
173.2, 133.9, 118.2, 67.3, 51.8, 40.9, 40.4. GC data: (column: 30 m
×
0.25 mm
×
0.25 µm chiral capillary
◦
◦
column, Cyclodextrin-B 150 C for 10 min, rate: 0 C/min; carrier gas: He, press 90 kPa). t = 2.61 min.
R
3
.4. Preparation of MPA-Esters
3
.4.1. General Method for the Synthesis of MPA Esters of Secondary Alcohols
To a solution of the corresponding secondary alcohol (0.1 mmol) in dry CH Cl were added
2
2
1
.1 equivalent of N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (0.11 mmol, 23 mg) and 1.1 equivalent of the
◦
corresponding (R) or (S) MPA (0.11 mmol, 18 mg) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 C for
4–6 h. After completion of the reaction, the produced urea was filtered and the filtrate was evaporated
and then purified by column chromatography with 5/1 Hex/EtOAc. The produced corresponding
MPA-ester was isolated with 90% isolated yield.
(
R)-MPA Ester of (S)-Methyl 3-hydroxyhex-5-enoate
1
H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl ; Me Si):
δ 7.40–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.317–7.36 (m, 3H), 5.41–5.49 (m, 1H),
3
4
5
.30–5.35 (m, 1H), 4.84–4.90 (m, 2H), 4.72 (s, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.41 (s, 3H), 2.52–2.62 (m, 2H), 2.218–2.223
(m, 2H).
(
S)-MPA Ester of (S)-Methyl 3-hydroxyhex-5-enoate
1
H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl ; Me Si):
δ 7.40–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.31–7.36 (m, 3H), 5.65–5.74 (m, 1H),
3
4
5.26–5.35 (m, 1H), 5.05–5.08 (m, 2H), 4.71 (s, 1H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 2.44–2.50 (m, 2H), 2.37–2.41
(m, 2H).