2010
L. Fumagalli et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 57 (2016) 2009–2011
The information provided by the binary phase diagram is very
useful, but the composition of the eutectic of this diagram is not
always independent of the nature of the crystallization solvent
and it has to be compared with solubility measurements. These
indicated that (R,R)-3, the lower melting diastereomer, has a
17.2 g/100 mL solubility in toluene at 25 °C, while (R,S)-3, the
higher melting diastereomer, has a 5.2 g/100 mL solubility under
the same conditions. Such a considerable solubility difference
prospected a maximum 0.70 resolution efficiency,22 a value close
O
O
CONH
*
H2N
Me
Me
*
O
O
COOX
*
*
1 X=H 1a X=Me
2
3
We therefore reasoned that (S)-2, though unable to resolve rac-
1 when used as a salifying agent,12 could generate diastereomers
separable by crystallization if covalently attached to rac-1. The lar-
ger availability of the enantiomers of 2, compared to that of its
para-substituted analogues, prompted us to this approach as well
as some significant successful examples reported in the litera-
ture.13,15–18
Covalent attachment was realized through an amide bond. An
equimolar mixture of the two diastereomeric amides between
(R)-2 and (R)- and (S)-1, namely (R,R)-3 and (S,R)-3, was near quan-
titatively obtained by reaction of rac-1a,9 the methyl ester of rac-1,
with an excess of (R)-2 in THF in the presence of a little more than
stoichiometric amount of magnesium chloride.19 Removal of the
excess of (R)-2, then quantitatively recovered, allowed the mixture
of (R,R)-3 and (S,R)-3 to be isolated by simple concentration and
treatment with diisopropyl ether as a white solid.
Alongside this, we analogously prepared two samples of (R,R)-3
and (S,R)-3 from the methyl esters (R)-1a9 and (S)-1a9, respec-
tively, in order to determine the physical properties of the two
diastereomeric amides and to investigate the solid phase beha-
viour of their mixtures. We found that the melting temperature
of (S,R)-3 (102.7 °C) largely exceeded that of (R,R)-3 (75.0 °C), while
DSC analysis of a series of differently proportioned (R,R)-3/(S,R)-3
mixtures revealed that the two diastereomeric amides produce a
simple eutectic. The resultant experimental binary melting-point
phase diagram, depicted in Figure 1, is typical of a conglomerate.
As can be seen in the same figure, the experimental values
acceptably fit within the theoretical ones (solid curve) calculated
on the basis of the melting points of (S,R)-3 and (R,R)-3 and of
the respective enthalpies (27.68 and 24.88 kJ molꢀ1) using the
Schröder-van Laar equation, although some difference can be
observed between the eutectic composition indicated by the inter-
to 0.75 indicated by the experimental 0.20 veu
.
The whole resolution procedure is shown in Scheme 1.
Crystallization of 5 g of equimolar mixture of (R,R)-3 and (S,R)-3
from a toluene volume (14.5 mL) sufficient to keep 2.5 g of (R,R)-3
dissolved at 25 °C gave results in line with the foreseen 0.70–0.75
resolution efficiency: a precipitate of (S,R)-3 was isolated in 70.4%
yield (1.76 g) and with >98% diastereomeric excess.23 Moreover,
the mother liquors were concentrated and chromatographed on
silica gel to yield 2.0 g of (R,R)-3 and additional 0.61 g of (R,S)-3,
both with >99% de. Overall, at the end of the procedure, 94.8% of
(S,R)-3 and 80% of (R,R)-3 were, respectively, recovered.23
Successive hydrolyses, accomplished in dioxane and 6 N HCl,
provided (S)-1 and (R)-1 in quantitative yield and with no less
enantiomeric excess than the diastereomeric excess of the respec-
tive parent amides, as demonstrated by chiral HPLC analysis
according to a previously reported method. Also the recovery of
(R)-2 was near quantitative.24
We have recently reported that mandelic acid efficiently
resolves 2-aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane (5)25 and we have suc-
cessively demonstrated that (S)-5 and (R)-5 are valuable interme-
diates which give access, among others, to the enantiomers of
1,4-benzodioxane-2-carboxamide (4).26 Indeed, the conversion of
(R,R)-3 and (S,R)-3 into the enantiomers of 4 and subsequently of
5 has poor atom economy and implies deletion of the valuable chi-
ral auxiliary (Scheme 2). Nevertheless, we wished to verify on
(S,R)-3 whether this route is practicable in terms of yield and of
stereoisomeric purity preservation. In order to remove ethylben-
zene and to obtain (S)-4, the resolved diastereomer (S,R)-3 was ini-
tially submitted to hydrogenolysis under different conditions but
section of the two branches of the theoretical curve (0.32 veu of the
rac-1a + (R)-2
higher melting diastereomer (S,R)-3) and the composition of the
mixture exhibiting the lowest experimental melting point
(0.20 veu of (S,R)-3). The latter veu value prospects, under the best
crystallization conditions, a maximum 0.75 resolution efficiency
(S),20 that is the precipitation of 75% of (R,S)-3 diastereomerically
O
O
O
O
O
O
NH
NH
+
Me
Me
pure, whereas the former
veu value (0.32) a modest 0.53 resolution
efficiency.21
(R,R)-3
(S,R)-3
crystallization
(S,R)-3
chromatography
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
(R,R)-3
(S)-1 + (R)-2
(R)-1 + (R)-2
Scheme 1. Resolution of 1 via diastereomeric phenethylamides.
80
O
O
NH2
70
O
O
O
O
60
NH
NH2
50
Me
O
O
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0
(R)-5
molar ratio of (R,R)-3
(S,R)-3
(S)-4
Figure 1. Binary melting-point phase diagram for the diastereomeric system (R,R)-
3/(S,R)-3. The solid curve represents the values calculated on the basis of the
Schröder-van Laar equation.
Scheme 2. Unichiral 1,4-benzodioxane-2-carboxamide and 2-aminomethyl-1,4-
benzodioxane from the resolved phenethylamide of 1,4-benzodioxane-2-carboxylic
acid.