1068 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 74, No. 6 (2001)
Preparation of Artificial Urushi
5.32 (2H, m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.60–6.73 (3H, m, Ar), 8.98 (2H, br,
ArOH); FT-IR (KBr) 3373 (O–H), 3004, 2924, 2853 (C–H), 1706
(CꢁO), 1607, 1519, 1446 (CꢁC of Ar), 1289, 1190 (C–O),
864, 811, 718 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
from monomeric phenol derivatives (urushiol analogues),
which do not possess the rash-causing properties. This study
deals with comprehensive results of preparation of the artificial
urushi.
[4-(cis,cis-9,12-Octadecadienoyloxy)methyl]catechol (4b):
1
Yield ꢁ 39%; H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 0.85 (3H, t, J ꢁ 7.3 Hz,
Experimental
CH3),1.27(14H,br,–CCH2C–), 1.50 (2H, m, –C(ꢁO)CH2CH2C–),
2.01 (4H, br, –CHꢁCHCH2C–), 2.28 (2H, t, J ꢁ 7.3 Hz,
–C(ꢁO)CH2C), 2.73 (2H, m, –CHꢁCHCH2CHꢁCH–), 4.88 (2H,
s, ArCH2O), 5.32 (4H, m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.60–6.73 (3H, m, Ar),
8.94 (2H, br, ArOH); FT-IR (KBr) 3377 (O–H), 3010, 2928, 2855
(C–H), 1704 (CꢁO), 1613, 1522, 1448 (CꢁC of Ar), 1289, 1190
(C–O), 866, 811, 723 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
Materials. Laccase derived from Pycnoporus coccineus was
purchased from Koken Co. (Tokyo). Pseudomonas cepacia lipase
was purchased from Amano Pharmaceutical Co. (Aichi). The so-
called “acetone powder” (AP) was obtained by pouring Chinese
urushi sap into a large amount of acetone.31 The resulting powder
had no laccase activity. Starch-urea phosphate was provided from
Nippi Inc. (Tokyo). Vanillyl alcohol (2), unsaturated fatty acids
(3), other reagents, and solvents were commercially available and
were used without further purifications.
Synthesis of 4-(Hydroxymethyl)catechol (1). To a disper-
sion of 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (15 g, 0.109 mol) in 70 mL of
ethanol, was added sodium tetrahydroborate (3.0 g, 0.079 mol) in
120 mL of water at 0 ˚C. After 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde be-
came completely soluble in the solvent, the reaction mixture was
kept at room temperature for 30 min. The solution was adjusted to
pH 3–4 by addition of dilute hydrochloric acid and then concen-
trated under reduced pressure. Sodium chloride was added until
the solution became saturated and then the products were extract-
ed with diethyl ether. The organic layer was washed with water
and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solution was
concentrated under reduced pressure and the mixture was subject-
ed to recrystallization using a mixture of diethyl ether/1,2-dichlo-
roethane at ꢀ20 ˚C. The resulting crystal was collected by filtra-
tion and dried in vacuo to give 9.9 g of 4-(hydroxymethyl)catechol
1 (yield 65%). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 4.3 (2H, d, J ꢁ 5.2 Hz,
ArCH2O), 4.89 (1H, t, J ꢁ 5.6 Hz, CH2OH), 6.52–6.72 (3H, m,
Ar), 8.66 (1H, s, ArOH), 8.76 (1H, s, ArOH); FT-IR (KBr) 3369
(O–H), 1606, 1527 (CꢁC of Ar), 1203, 1159, 1122 cmꢀ1 (C–O);
mp 123–128 ˚C (ref. 137 ˚C).32
Enzymatic Synthesis of Urushiol Analogues. A typical pro-
cedure was as follows. A mixture of 2 (3.1 g, 20 mmol), 3b (2.8 g,
10 mmol), and crude lipase (10 g) in a mixture of 90 mL of isopro-
pyl ether and 10 mL of tetrahydrofuran was heated at 60 ˚C under
gentle stirring. After 240 h, the enzyme was removed by filtration
and the filtrate was poured into water. The organic layer was sep-
arated and further washed twice with water. The organic solution
was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure. Remaining 2 was removed by
recrystallization to give 3.4 g of 2-methoxy-[4-(cis,cis-9,12-octa-
decadienoyloxy)methyl]phenol (5b) (yield 81%). 1H NMR (DM-
SO-d6) δ 0.85 (3H, t, J ꢁ 6.9 Hz, CH3), 1.26 (14H, br, –CCH2C–),
1.52 (2H, m, –C(ꢁO)CH2CH2C–), 2.01(4H, m, –CHꢁCHCH2C–),
2.29 (2H, t, J ꢁ 7.3 Hz, –C(ꢁO)CH2C), 2.73 (2H, m, –CHꢁCH-
CH2CHꢁCH–), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.95 (2H, s, ArCH2O), 5.32
(4H, m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.73–6.91 (3H, m, Ar), 9.06 (1H, br, ArOH);
FT-IR (KBr) 3444 (O–H), 3007, 2925, 2853 (C–H), 1735
(CꢁO), 1606, 1517, 1460 (CꢁC of Ar), 1273, 1157, 1035 (C–O),
850, 816, 796, 720 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
[4-(cis,cis,cis-9,12,15-Octadecatrienoyloxy)methyl]catechol
(4c): Yield ꢁ 46%; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 0.92 (3H, t, J ꢁ 7.3
Hz, CH3), 1.24 (8H, br, –CCH2C–), 1.51 (2H, m, –C(ꢁO)CH2-
CH2C–), 2.03 (4H, br, –CHꢁCHCH2C–), 2.28 (2H, t, J ꢁ 7.3 Hz,
–C(ꢁO)CH2C), 2.77 (4H, m, –CHꢁCHCH2CHꢁCH–), 4.88 (2H,
s, ArCH2O), 5.32 (6H, m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.60–6.73 (3H, m, Ar),
8.94 (2H, br, ArOH); FT-IR (KBr) 3386 (O–H), 3008, 2930, 2855
(C–H), 1705 (CꢁO), 1612, 1523, 1449 (CꢁC of Ar), 1292, 1190,
1114 (C–O), 856, 813, 725 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
2-Methoxy-[4-(cis-9-octadecenoyloxy)methyl]phenol (5a):
1
Yield ꢁ 87%; H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 0.85 (3H, t, J ꢁ 7.2 Hz,
CH3),1.23(20H,br,–CCH2C–),1.51(2H, m, –C(ꢁO)CH2CH2C–),
2.01 (2H, br, –CHꢁCHCH2C–), 2.29 (2H, t, J ꢁ 7.3 Hz,
–C(ꢁO)CH2C), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.95 (2H, s, ArCH2O), 5.33
(2H, m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.73–6.91 (3H, m, Ar), 9.06 (1H, br, ArOH);
FT-IR (KBr) 3443 (O–H), 3004, 2924, 2853 (C–H), 1732
(CꢁO), 1606, 1517, 1463 (CꢁC of Ar), 1275, 1157, 1035 (C–O),
850, 816, 796, 720 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
2-Methoxy-[4-(cis,cis,cis-9,12,15-octadecatrienoyloxy)me-
1
thyl]phenol (5c): Yield ꢁ 80%; H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 0.92
(3H, t, J ꢁ 7.8 Hz, CH3), 1.29 (8H, br, –CCH2C–), 1.52 (2H, m,
–C(ꢁO)CH2CH2C–), 2.03 (4H, br, –CHꢁCHCH2C–), 2.30 (2H, t,
J ꢁ 7.3 Hz, –C(ꢁO)CH2C), 2.77 (4H, m, –CHꢁCHCH2-
CHꢁCH–), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.95 (2H, s, ArCH2O), 5.33 (6H,
m, –CHꢁCH–), 6.73–6.91 (3H, m, Ar), 9.06 (1H, br, ArOH); FT-
IR (KBr) 3446 (O–H), 3009, 2927, 2854 (C–H), 1734
(CꢁO), 1606, 1517, 1463 (CꢁC of Ar), 1275, 1229, 1157, 1035
(C–O), 851, 818, 796, 720 cmꢀ1 (C–H of Ar).
Enzymatic Curing of Urushiol Analogues.
A typical run
was as follows. A mixture of an urushiol analogue (0.20 g), lacca-
se solution (0.030 mL, 4.5 ꢂ 104 units), and acetone powder (0.15
g) was coated using a film applicator with slit thickness of 50 µm
on a glass plate and kept in 80% humidity at 30 ˚C for 24 h.
Measurements. 1H NMR and IR spectra were recorded on a
300 MHz Varian BB300 and Perkin-Elmer Paragon 1000 spec-
trometers, respectively. Film hardness was evaluated by a Fis-
cherscope H100VS microhardness tester with test force of 1 mN
(Helmut Fischer). Gloss value of films was measured at 60˚ by a
Minolta CM-3610d gloss meter. Pyrolysis GC-MS measurement
was carried out using a Frontier Lab PY-2010D vertical micro fur-
nace-type pyrolyzer, a Hewlett-Packard HP 6890 gas chromato-
graph and a JEOL Automass II spectrometer. The pyrolysis was
carried out at 500 ˚C. The GC analysis was performed using a
Frontier Lab PY-1 column kept at 40 ˚C and subsequently heated
at 20 ˚C/min rate to 330 ˚C. Dynamic viscoelasticity was mea-
sured using a Toyo Baldwin Rheovibron DDV-II-EA with fre-
quency of 3.5 Hz at a heating rate of 1 ˚C minꢀ1. DSC measure-
ments were made at a 10 ˚C minꢀ1 heating rate under nitrogen
using a Mac Science DSC-3200S differential scanning calorimeter
Similarly, 4a–4c, 5a, and 5c were synthesized. As for 4a–4c,
these analogues were purified by silica-gel chromatography (elu-
ent: hexane/ethyl acetate ꢁ 77/23 (vol%)). [4-(cis-9-Octade-
cenoyloxy)methyl]catechol (4a): Yield ꢁ 39%; 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6) δ 0.85 (3H, t, J ꢁ 6.8 Hz, CH3), 1.28 (20H, br, –CCH2C–),
1.50(2H,m, –C(ꢁO)CH2CH2C–), 2.00(2H, br, –CHꢁCHCH2C–),
2.17 (2H, t, J ꢁ 7.6 Hz, –C(ꢁO)CH2C), 4.90 (2H, s, ArCH2O),