NoVel Piperidine-Bridged Donor-Acceptor Systems
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 35, 1996 8427
a Bruker AC 200 (200 MHz), Bruker WM 250 (250 MHz), or a Bruker
ARX 400 (400 MHz) spectrometer. The latter was also used for 13
C
3
NMR (APT) and COSY spectra in CDCl . Chemical shifts are given
in ppm downfield from tetramethylsilane. Melting points are not
corrected. Column chromatography was performed with the indicated
solvent using Janssen Chimica silicagel (0.030-0.075 mm grain). R
f
values were obtained by using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on
silicagel-coated plastic sheets (Merck silicagel 60 F254) with the same
solvent as for column chromatography. High-resolution electron impact
mass measurements (MS) were carried out using a Jeol JMS-SX/
SX102A tandem mass spectrometer.
Figure 2. Numbering scheme of 3a; H and C atoms in 3b and 4 are
labeled correspondingly.
resonances is shown in Figure 2. Wherever appropriate, this system
of numbering is maintained throughout the experimental section.
The electronic absorption spectra were recorded on a Hewlett Packard
1
13
Assignment of the H and C NMR signals was done on the basis of
8
451A diode array spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were
1
1
13
1
H- H shift-correlated 2D NMR (COSY), C- H COSY, and long-
measured using a Spex Fluorolog 2 with correction for the wavelength
dependence of the detection system containing a RCA C31034
photomultiplier. Fluorescence decay curves of 3a and 4 were measured
by means of time-correlated single photon counting (SPC) (λex ) 317
range 13C- H COSY.
1
N-(1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-piperidinyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (2-[1-
(4-methoxyphenyl)piperidin-4-yl]benz[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione) (3a).
nm, fwhm ) ca. 22 ps). The setup has been described earlier.9
The reaction was carried out under a dry-N atmosphere. 1,8-Naphthalic
2
A
anhydride (1.64 g, 8.24 mmol) was dissolved in 200 mL of DMF and
heated to 120 °C. A solution of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)piperidin-4-
ylamine in 50 mL of DMF was added dropwise and the mixture was
stirred over night at 120 °C, whereupon the solvent was evaporated.
total of 2048 channels of the Multi Channel Buffer (EG&G Ortec 918
ADCAM) working in a pulse-height analysis mode were used. The
channel widths used were 2.5, 5, and 10 ps/channel. Fluorescence decay
curves of 3b were measured with a nanosecond time scale setup,
3
6
The solid was dissolved in CH
filtered off. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness and the residue
was submitted to repeated crystallization from CH Cl . Crude product
was obtained in a 1.58 g yield. Column chromatography of 148 mg
2 2
Cl and 1,8-naphthalic anhydride was
described earlier, using a Lumonics Pulse Master EX748 XeCl
Excimer laser (λex ) 308 nm, fwhm ca. 7 ns) as an excitation source.
This laser was also used for recording the flash photolysis transient
absorption spectra, along with a 450-W high-pressure Xe arc as the
probe light, pulsed with a M u¨ ller Elektronik MSP05 pulser. The overall
2
2
of this solid using CH
mg, 0.25 mmol, 32%). R
2940, 2920, 2800, 1690 (CdO), 1650 (CdO), 1615, 1580 (CdC). H
2
Cl
2
as eluent afforded 3a as a yellow solid (90.8
-1
9
f
0.20. Mp 212.7-214.1 °C. IR (cm ) 2980,
time resolution of this setup is ca. 10 ns. Concentrations of the studied
1
-
5
compounds were ca. 10 M for the fluorescence measurements and
-
4
NMR (400 MHz) δ 8.58 (d, 2H; H23, H29), 8.19 (d, 2H; H25, H27),
ca. 10 M for transient absorption measurements (A ) 0.1 at λex in a
-cm cell). The samples were carefully deoxygenated by purging with
7
2
.74 (t, 2H; H24, H28), 6.98-6.94 (m, 2H; H8, H12), 6.86-6.82 (m,
H; H9, H11), 5.14 (m, 1H; H4), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH ), 3.66 (d, 2H;
1
3
argon (ca. 15 min) or by repetitive freeze-pump-thaw cycles.
Spectroelectrochemistry. The UV-vis spectroelectrochemical
experiment with 4 was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 5 UV-
vis spectrophotometer connected to a 3600 data station. An OTTLE
H2eq, H6eq), 3.01 (qd, 2H; H3eq, H5eq), 2.84 (t, 2H; H2ax, H6ax), 1.78
13
(
(
d, 2H; H3ax, H5ax). C NMR (100 MHz) 164.60 (C16, C20), 153.66
C10), 146.14 (C7), 133.63 (C25, C27), 131.47 (C26), 131.19 (C23,
3
7
C29), 128.20 (C18), 126.95 (C24, C28), 123.13 (C17, C19), 118.96
C8, C12), 114.37 (C9, C11), 55.58 (C14), 51.95 (C4), 51.77 (C2, C6),
8.44 (C3, C5). High-resolution MS: found m/z 386.1630; calcd for
m/z 386.1630.
N-Cyclohexyl-1,8-naphthalimide (2-cyclohexylbenz[de]isoquino-
cell equipped with a Pt-minigrid working electrode (32 wires/cm)
and quartz/CaF windows was used at room temperature. The working
(
2
2
electrode surroundings were masked carefully to avoid spectral interfer-
ence with the non-electrolyzed solution. Controlled-potential elec-
trolysis within the OTTLE cell was carried out by a PA4 (EKOM,
Czech Republic) potentiostat. The sample solution in butyronitrile was
24 22 2 3
C H N O
line-1,3-dione) (4). A solution of cyclohexylamine (1.5 g, 15 mmol)
and acetic acid (3 mL) in 45 mL of DMF was added dropwise to 1,8-
naphthalic anhydride (2.0 g, 10 mmol) in 30 mL of DMF at 40 °C.
The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 30 min and at 150 °C for 4 h.
After the mixture was cooled to room temperature the solvent was
evaporated and the residue was washed with water and dissolved in
prepared and handled under an N
2
atmosphere. The concentrations of
NPF supporting electrolyte
were 5 × 10 and 3 × 10 M, respectively.
the electrolyzed compound 4 and the (nBu)
4
6
-
3
-1
The reduction potential of 4 was determined by cyclic voltammetry
using a gas-tight three-electrode cell and a Bank Electronic POS 73
Wenking Potentioscan potentiostat coupled to a HP 7090A measurement
plotting system. The measurements were carried out in deoxygenated
acetonitrile containing tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEAFB)
CH
2
Cl
2
. The CH
2
Cl
2
layer was washed with water and saturated sodium
SO , and the solvent was
bicarbonate solution and dried with Na
2
4
evaporated. The residue was dissolved in DMF/acetic acid, a saturated
sodium bicarbonate solution was added, and the mixture was heated
for 30 min at ca. 100 °C. The solid was filtered off and dissolved in
(ca. 0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte and at sweep rates of 100-400
mV/s. A platinum disk (2 mm) working electrode with a Pt gauze
auxiliary electrode was used in combination with a saturated calomel
reference electrode (SCE) connected to the cell Via a 3M KCl salt
bridge.
CH
2
Cl
2
. This solution was washed with water and saturated NaHCO
3
,
dried with Na
2
SO , and evaporated to dryness. Crystallization of the
4
residue from ethanol yielded 4 as light yellow needles (1.22 g, 4.37
mmol, 44%). Mp 231-233 °C. IR 3080-3000, 2930, 2850, 1695,
Synthesis. The method used for the synthesis of the imide systems
was reported earlier by Demmig and Langhals.38 Reaction of 1-(4-
methoxyphenyl)piperidin-4-ylamine or 1-phenylpiperidin-4-ylamine
with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride affords the bichromophoric systems 3a
and 3b, respectively. The acceptor-model system 4 is obtained from
reaction of cyclohexylamine with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride. 1-Phen-
1
1
8
2
655, 1630, 1590. H NMR (250 MHz) δ 8.52 (d, 2H; H23, H29),
.14 (d, 2H; H25, H27), 7.70 (t, 2H; H24, H28), 5.01 (“t”, 1H; H4),
.54 (q, 2H; H3ax, H5ax), 1.89 (“d”, 2H; H3eq, H5eq), 1.73 (“d”, 3H;
H1eq, H2eq, H6eq), 1.55-1.22 (m, 3H; H1ax, H2ax, H6ax). High-resolution
MS: found m/z 279.1254; calcd for C18 17NO m/z 279.1259. UV
H
2
-1
-1
-1
-1
(
acetonitrile), λ(ꢀ): 332 (12300 M cm ), 346 (11300 M cm ).
3
9
ylpiperidin-4-ylamine was synthesized Via a known route from
N-(1-Phenyl-4-piperidinyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (2-(1-phenylpip-
eridin-4-yl)benz[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione) (3b). The same method
was employed as described for 4 using 1-phenylpiperidin-4-ylamine
1
-phenylpiperidone (Via the oxim derivative). 1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-
piperidin-4-ylamine was obtained analogously from 1-(4-methoxyphen-
yl)piperidone. The synthesis of the donor-reference systems 5a and
(
(
2.05 g, 12 mmol), acetic acid (2 mL), and 1,8-naphthalic anhydride
1.34 g, 7 mmol). Crystallization from CH Cl /n-hexane afforded 3b
40
5
b has been described elsewhere. Numbering for assignment of NMR
2
2
as yellow needles (250 mg, 0.70 mmol, 10%). Mp 249-250 °C. IR
(
(
36) Ramesdonk, H. J.; Verhoeven, J. W. Tek Imager 1989, 1, 2.
37) Krejcik, M.; Danek, M.; Hartl, F. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
1
3
100-2860, 2810, 1695, 1655, 1625, 1590. H NMR (200 MHz) δ
8
.57 (d, 2H; H23, H29), 8.18 (d, 2H; H25, H27), 7.74 (t, 2H; H24,
Electrochem. 1991, 317, 179.
(
38) Demmig, S.; Langhals, H. Chem.Ber. 1988, 121, 225.
H28), 7.37-7.18 (m, 2H; H9, H11), 6.99 (d, 2H; H8, H12), 6.83 (t,
1H; H10), 5.23 (“t”, 1H; H4), 3.84 (“d”, 2H; H2eq, H6eq), 3.20-2.80
(39) Scherer, T.; Hielkema, W.; Krijnen, B.; Hermant, R. M.; Eijckelhoff,
C.; Kerkhof, F.; Ng, A. K. F.; Verleg, R.; van der Tol, E. B.; Brouwer, A.
M.; Verhoeven, J. W. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1993, 112, 535.
(40) Krijnen, L. B. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1990.