References
1
a) J. Datta, M. Włoch, Polym. Bull
Maisonneuve, O. Lamarzelle, E. Rix, E. Grau, H.
Cramail, Chem. Rev 2015 115, 12407. c) B. Ochiai, T.
Endo, Prog. Polym. Sci 2005 30, 183.
a) H. Büttner, L. Longwitz, J. Steinbauer, C. Wulf, T.
Werner, Top. Curr. Chem 2017 375, 50. b) T. Fujihara,
M. Inokuchi, T. Mizoe, K. Nogi, J. Terao, Y. Tsuji,
Chem. Lett 2017 46, 968. c) J. Hasegawa, R. Miyazaki,
C. Maeda, T. Ema, Chem. Rec 2016 16, 2260. d) X.-D.
Lang, L.-N. He, Chem. Rec 2016 16, 1337.
a) M. Bähr, A. Bitto, R. Mülhaupt, Green Chem
. 2016, 73, 1459. b) L.
.
,
.
,
2
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
3
4
5
6
7
.
2012
2012
,
,
1
1
4
4
, 1447. b) M. Bähr, R. Mülhaupt, Green Chem
, 483.
.
R. Ciriminna, M. Lomeli-Rodriguez, P. D. Carà, J. A.
Figure 3. Conversion of ct-LO (○), t-LO ( ), and c-LO
□), and NMR yield of 4A1A-LM5CC (●) as a function
of TBAC amount (mol%). Reaction conditions: 100 °C,
0 h, and 3 MPa CO
Lopez-Sanchez, M. Pagliaro, Chem. Commun. 2014
5288.
a) C. Martín, A. W. Kleij, Macromolecules 2016
,
50
,
(
1
,
49,
2
2
.
6
285. b) H. Morinaga, Y. Kiyokawa, R. Fujikawa, D.
Nagai, H. Morikawa, Polym. Bull. 2014 71, 2421.
C. J. Whiteoak, E. Martin, M. Martinez, B. J.
,
Figure 2 shows a set of conversions of LO and the NMR
yield of 4A1A-LM5CC as a function of CO pressure. Under
ambient CO pressure, the carbonation of ct-LO barely
proceeded. Once CO was pressurized, the reaction of ct-LO
Benet-Buchholz, A. W. Kleij, Adv. Synth. Catal
354, 469.
. 2012,
2
2
a) J. Martínez, J. Fernández-Baeza, L. F. Sánchez-Barba,
J. A. Casro-Osma, A. Lara-Sánchez, A. Otero,
2
smoothly proceeded. In the region examined, values of the
conversion of ct-LO were similar to those of the NMR yield.
ChemSusChem 2017
C. Martín, M. M. Belmonte, E. Martin, E. C.
Escudero-Adán, A. W. Kleij, ChemSusChem 2016
, 10, 2886. b) G. Fiorani, M. Stuck,
Before the CO
both c-LO and t-LO increased with increasing pressure. They
reached 27% and 85% under 5 MPa CO , and the NMR yield
2
pressure reached 5 MPa, the conversions of
,
9,
1
304. c) L. P. Carrodeguas, J. González-Fabra, F.
2
Castro-Gómez, C. Bo, A. W. Kleij, Chem.-Eur. J. 2015
,
of 4A1A-LM5CC reached 56%. However, when the pressure
was further increased beyond 5 MPa, the conversion decreased
slightly with increasing pressure. Next, the effect of TBAC
amount on the conversion of ct-LO and NMR yield of
21, 6115.
8
C. J. Whiteoak, N. Kielland, V. Laserna, F.
Castro-Gómez, E. Martin, E. C. Escudero-Adán, C. Bo,
A. W. Kleij, Chem.-Eur. J
C. J. Whiteoak, E. Martin, E. E.-Adán, A. W. Kleij, Adv.
Synth. Catal 2013 355, 2233.
0 S.-Y. Park, H.-Y. Park, H.-S. Lee, S.-W. Park, C.-S.
Park, D.-W. Ha, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem
001 39, 1472.
1 D. Steiner, L. Ivison, C. T. Goralski, R. B. Appell, J. R.
Gojkovic, B. Singaram, Tetrahedron Asym 2002 13
359.
. 2014, 20, 2264.
9
1
4
1
A1A-LM5CC was also evaluated. As shown in Figure 3, with
mol% TBAC, the conversion was very low. The conversion
.
,
and NMR yield increased gradually with increasing TBAC
amount. The conversion of t-LO was about four times higher
than that of c-LO. With 40 mol% TBAC, t-LO reached
quantitative consumption, whereas the conversion of c-LO was
still as low as 48%.
.
2
,
1
.
,
,
2
The conversion and NMR yield depended on the
reaction temperature (Figure 10S in SI). At 60 °C and 80 °C,
the conversion of ct-LO was 15% and 24%, respectively. It is
obvious that the increase of temperature enhanced the
conversion and NMR yield. When the temperature was raised
to 100 °C or 120 °C, the conversion increased to 51% or 71%,
respectively. It increased to 75% at 140 °C; however, unknown
by-products in a NMR yield of ~ca. 5% were detected. From
these results in Figures 2, 3, and 10S, it became clear that
LM5CCs can be obtained with only TBAC by choosing the
reaction conditions.
12 a) B. Hao, M. J. Gunaratna, M. Zhang, S. Weerasekara,
S. N. Seiwald, V. T. Nguyen, A. Meier, D. H. Hua, J.
Am. Chem. Soc
R. Manjunatha, P. Srinivas, B. K. Bettadaiah, J. Chem.
Sci. 2014 126, 875.
. 2016, 138, 16839. b) S. C. S. Kumar, J.
,
1
3 Ref. 12b) was cited in ref. 12a). However, the reaction
mechanism of d-limonene-1,2-diol in ref.
1
2b) indicates clearly the formation of an
isomer having not (1
R
,
,
2
2S,
S
,
4
4
R
R
)
)
configurations but (1
S
configurations. Indeed,1 the chemical
3
shifts, especially in the C NMR, in ref.
In conclusion, LO with CO
2
was reacted to give
12 are close to those for the (1
isomer in ref. 14.
S, 2S, 4R)
d-limonene-derived 5CCs (LM5CCs). Among the four kinds of
diastereomers of LM5CCs, we achieved the individual
synthesis of 4A-LM5CC from cis-LO and 1A-LM5CC from
trans-LO. The syntheses can be made highly stereoselective
simply by commercially available TBAC. Moreover, we
studied the relationship between the reaction conditions and the
conversion of LO and NMR yield of LM5CCs. We believe that
1
4 a) S. Águila, R. Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Tinoco, M. Rivera,
G. Pecchi, J. B. Alderete, Green Chem 2008 10, 647. b)
Z. Wang, Y.-T. Cui, Z.-B. Xu, J. Qu, J. Org. Chem
008 73, 2270.
.
,
.
2
,
1
1
5 P. A. Wender, N. Buschmann, N. B. Cardin, L. R. Jones,
C. Kan, J.-M. Kee, J. A. Kowalski, K. E. Longcore, Nat.
Chem. 2011, 3, 615.
6 N. Kihara, N. Hara, T. Endo, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
this synthetic study will help to develop
a bio-based
polyurethane industrial process starting from LM5CC, as well
as the synthesis of limonene-derived bioactive compounds.
6198.
Supporting Information
Supplemental
data,
experimental
procedures,
characterization data.