Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
We hypothesized that the challenges could be due to the
presence of the ketone and potential retro-aza-Michael
reactions and/or other reaction pathways, and selected to
conduct ketone reduction. This rationale was confirmed by
Table 2. Selected Reduction Attempts on Ketone 17
reducing the ketone on test scale with NaBH and then
4
subsequently opening the β-lactam with BF ·OEt , which
3
2
e
proceeded smoothly by TLC and gave us confidence to delay
the lactam opening step to after stereoselective ketone
reduction.
results
24:25
a
entry
1
conditions
DIBAL (0.75equiv), THF, −78 °C to rt, 15 h
SM
observed
24% with 1:1
b
To evaluate the conditions required for stereoselective
ketone reduction, bicyclic β-lactam 23 was prepared smoothly
2
3
4
5
6
7
LiBH (1.1 equiv), THF, −78 °C, 3 h
4
b
dr
61
via a three step TBS deprotection, cross-metathesis, and aza-
Michael cyclization sequence (Scheme 2). It is worth noting
Li(t-BuO) Al−H (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C, 0.5 h 50% with 5:4
3
dr
Zn(BH ) (1 equiv), THF, −3 °C, 12 h
77% with 1:3
dr
30% 1:1 dr
4
2
Scheme 2. Preparation of Bicyclic β-Lactam 23
b,c
CBS (100 mol %), BMS (2 equiv) CH Cl , 0 °C,
2
2
5
min
CeCl (20 mol %), NaBH (2 equiv) MeOH, −25 50% 1:4 dr
3
4
°
C, 1 h
CeCl (20 mol %), NaBH (2 equiv) MeOH, −78 97% 1:6 dr
3
4
°
C, 5 min
8
9
L-selectride (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C, 30 min
K-selectride (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C, 30 min
45% 1:5 dr
60% with 1:1
dr
10
11
12
K-selectride (1.2 equiv), Et O, −78 °C, 30 min
40% 4:3 dr
45% 3:2 dr
2
K-selectride (1.2 equiv), Et O, 25 °C, 3 min
2
K-selectride (1.03 equiv), KBF (1.2 equiv) Et O, 25 64% 5:4 dr
4
2
°C, 3 min
1
3
K-selectride (0.97 equiv), KBF (1.2 equiv) 0.01 M 59% 5:4 dr
4
that the aza-Michael cyclization proceeds smoothly in the
presence of the free hydroxyl group, whereas in our model, we
employed a TBS protecting group. With ample quantities of 23
in hand, an array of conditions was screened (Table 2). Most
reaction conditions proceeded to provide the opposite
diastereomer 25 required for batzelladine, with Luche
conditions providing 97% yield and 6:1 dr (entry 7, Table
Et O, 25 °C, 3 min
2
14
K-selectride (1.15 equiv), KBF (1.2 equiv) 0.01 M 68% 5:3 dr
4
toluene, 25 °C, 3 min
1
5
(PPh ) RhCl 10 mol %, H balloon EtOAc, 25 °C, NR
3
3
2
2
4 h
6d
7d
1
1
Pt/C cartridge, 120 bar H EtOAc, 55 °C, 1 h
NR
2
Ru/C cartridge, 120 bar H EtOAc, 55 °C, 1 h
60% 1:1 dr
2
a
All reactions were performed at 0.1 M, unless otherwise noted.
Over reduced product, [M + H] = 326 dominated. Enantiopure
starting material was used. Reaction was performed in H-cube at
.05 M, 1 mL/min. Isolated yield.
2
). Fortunately, moving to bulky hydride reagents began to
b
c
+
invert this selectivity, and we ultimately identified K-selectride
in toluene as the optimal conditions yielding 24 in 68% yield
and a 3:5 dr favoring the desired diastereomer (entry 14, Table
d
e
0
2
). While this dr is modest, the reaction is highly scalable and
provides preparatively useful quantities of material that can be
separated and recycled if desired. Initial attempts at employing
chiral reagents to overcome this selectivity were unsuccessful
overall yield. Utilizing this endgame, (±)-13-epi-batzelladine D
(30) and 31 were prepared from 28 (Scheme 2) and (±)-15-
epi-batzelladine D (S1) was also prepared from the
corresponding alcohol epimer 14 (See SI for details). This
final reaction cascade is plagued by the formation of the
elimination byproducts, and we have spent considerable effort
attempting to optimize this process (see Table S9−S10 for full
reaction screening). Overall, it does not appear that a simple
E1CB reaction accounts for the outcomes observed, and we
have been unable to significantly improve the product ratios to
date. Given the straightforward reaction conditions and our
ability to readily separate the product from the elimination
product, we have elected to utilize this optimized protocol to
access the enantioenriched natural products and their stereo-
chemical analogues.
Asymmetric Synthesis of (+)-Batzelladine D and
(−)-Batzelladine D. Having a concise synthesis of (±)-bat-
zelladine D (2) in hand, along with access to diastereomers of
the natural product, we sought to also explore the generation
of the enantiomeric series of compounds along with the
generation of gram-scale quantities of our key intermediates
(Scheme 4). To access the non-natural enantiomer, we chose
to start from commercially available β-lactam 32, already
bearing the necessary hydroxyethyl side chain and available on
(
entry 5, Table 2), but further studies are underway to explore
additional systems in this regard. Regardless, the optimized
conditions provide selective access to the unnatural diaster-
eomer and practically useful access to the natural stereoisomer.
Endgame and Synthesis of (± )-Batzelladine D. At this
stage, having access to all 4-alcohol diastereomers, we were
positioned to optimize the end game of our synthetic approach
and gain access to (±)-batzelladine D, (±)-13-epi-batzelladine
D, and (±)-15-epi-batzelladine D. As shown in Scheme 3,
opening of β-lactams 24 and 25 with side chain 26 proceed
smoothly upon activation with BF ·OEt to provide the target
dihydroxy pyrrolidines 27 and 28. Installation of the guanidine
by treatment with N,N-di-Boc-S-methylisothiourea and mer-
3
6
2
cury chloride was followed in the same pot by mesylation of
both alcohols, rapid displacement by the guanidine to install
the tricyclic core, and final treatment with formic acid to cleave
both the core and side-chain Boc protecting groups. This one-
pot process installed the three critical bonds of the core in a
stereoselective fashion and provided a separable 1.0:1.2
mixture of (±)-batzelladine D (2) and 29, resulting from β-
mesylate elimination under the reaction conditions with 41%
D
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX