X. Wang et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 71 (2008) 1433–1437
1435
ꢀ
2
.2.2. 5-[(Carbazol-9 -yl)methyl]-8-hydroxyquinoline (CZHQ)
A mixture of 3.34 g (0.02 mol) carbazole, 0.6 g (0.025 mol) NaH
and 30 ml DMSO was stirred until no bubble generated at room
temperature. After filtering the mixture, 1.12 g (0.02 mol) KOH
was added to the solution. 4.6 g (0.02 mol) 5-Chloromethyl-8-
hydroxyquinoline hydrochloride, which was dissolved by 10 ml
DMSO, was slowly dropped into the above solution. The mixture
◦
was stirred at room temperature for 3 h and heated to 70 C for 2 h.
The reaction solution was filtrated after adding to 200 ml water, the
precipitate was dissolved by ethanol, then adding the ethanol solu-
tion to 100 ml ice water gave the crude product. The crude product
was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: ethyl
−
1
acetate:n-hexane = 1:4). Yield: 51.8%. IR (KBr pellet) cm : 3050,
660, 1590, 1575, 1530, 1170, 795; 1H NMR (d-DMSO): ı 8.88 (s,
H), 8.22 (s, 1H), 7.52–6.87 (m, 11H), 5.95 (m, 2H). Element Anal.
Calcd. for CZHQ (C22H16 N O): C, 81.46; H, 4.97; N, 8.64. Found: C,
1
1
2
Fig. 2. Fluorescence spectra of (CZHQ)3Al at different concentration of DMTP.
8
1.52; H, 5.13; N, 8.55.
−5
Concentration of (CZHQ)3Al, 5.24 × 10 M; concentration of DMTP (mol/l, M), 0,
−7
−6
−6
−6
−5
0
8
.00; 1, 7.33 × 10 ; 2, 2.16 × 10 ; 3, 5.12 × 10 ; 4, 9.44 × 10 ; 5, 2.87 × 10 ; 6,
.14 × 10−
5
.
2
.2.3. (CZHQ) Al
3
A
mixture of 0.002 mol AlCl3, 3.0 ml methanol, 7.0 ml
dichloromethane was slowly added to 30 ml dichloromethane
under refluxing which was dissolved in 0.002 mol 5-((9H-carbazol-
3
.3. The interactions of (CZHQ) Al with dimethylterephalate and
3
N,N-dimethylaniline
9
-yl)methyl)-8-hydroxyquinoline (CZHQ). The reaction mixture
was refluxed for 30 min and a lot of deposition appeared. After
The fluorescence quenching technique was a helpful method
for the study of the mechanism of molecular interaction, energy
transfer or charge transfer. Dimethylterephthalate (DMTP) was a
typical electron acceptor and N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA) was a
typical electron donor. When DMTP was added to a solution of
filtrating, washing and drying, the (CZHQ) Al metal complex was
3
◦
obtained (m.p. >300 C).
3. Results and discussion
(
CZHQ) Al in DMSO, the fluorescence of (CZHQ) Al was efficiently
3
3
3
.1. UV–vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectrum
quenched and the quenching process followed the Stern–Volmer
equation (as shown in Fig. 2). The apparent quenching coefficient,
4
−1
Fig. 1 shows the UV–vis absorption spectra of (CZHQ) Al in
Ksv, was 1.54 × 10 M . The quenching process of (CZHQ) Al with
3
3
dilute DMSO solution. The maximum UV–vis absorption peak of
CZHQ was 343 nm with shoulder peak 330 nm, which was simi-
lar with the absorption spectra of carbazole and it should mainly
come from carbazole unit absorption. However, the fluorescence
DMA was also examined and shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen that
the fluorescence emission intensity of (CZHQ) Al were increased
3
with gradual addition of DMA in DMSO, which was obviously differ-
ent phenomenon with DMTP adding to (CZHQ) Al solution. From
3
emission peak of (CZHQ) Al was 522 nm that rooted in the emis-
the experimental facts and references, an explanation is possible
reasonable: DMA is a rich electron group with stronger ligand capa-
bility. There are competitive complex processes with metal Al3+ and
ligand atoms or molecules from DMA and CZHQ when DMA is grad-
3
sion peak of 8-hydroxyquinoline aluminum. In addition, due to
the charge transfer process of hole-transfer group (carbazole) and
electron-transfer group (8-hydroxyquinoline), the maximum emis-
3+
sion peak of (CZHQ) Al was obviously red-shift comparing to that
ually added into the (CZHQ) Al solution. The action of DMA and Al
3
3
of 8-hydroxyquinoline aluminum.
can reduce the quenching fluorescent intensities of (CZHQ) Al from
3
metal Al3+ ions.
3.2. Quantum yield of photoluminescence and the band gap
The photoluminescent quantum yield of (CZHQ) Al was mea-
3
sured by relative method using the quinine sulfate as the standard
0.546 in 0.5 mol/l H SO ) [18]. The quantum yield was calculated
(
2
4
from the following equation:
ꢀ
ꢁ
2
Fs Ar nr
˚s = ˚r
Fr As ns
In the above expression, ˚s is the fluorescent quantum yield,
F is the integration of the emission intensities, n is the index of
refraction of the solution, and A is the absorbance of the solu-
tion at the exciting wavelength. The subscripts r and s denote
the reference and unknown samples, respectively. The value
of quantum yield of (CZHQ) Al in DMSO was 0.62. The band
3
opt
gap (Eg ) of the complex can be estimated from the onset
opt
g
−34
absorption (UVonset) with E (eV) = hc/ꢀ (h = 6.626 × 10
J s,
Fig. 3. Fluorescence spectra of (CZHQ)3Al at different concentration of DMA.
−5
c = 3 × 10 nm/s, 1 eV = 1.602 × 10−19 J). The band gap of the metal
1
7
Concentration of (CZHQ)3Al, 5.24 × 10 M; concentration of DMA (mol/l, M), 0,
−
6
−6
−6
−5
−5
0
4
.00; 1, 5.78 × 10 ; 2, 1.97 × 10 ; 3, 9.88 × 10 ; 4, 1.16 × 10 ; 5, 2.28 × 10 ; 6,
complex was 2.89 eV.
−5
−4
.
.96 × 10 ; 7, 7.83 × 10