9
56
H. Traore et al.
radiatiative processes in the excited-state species. Also, in
the expected trans configuration, the imino methyl group
may be much less hindered than the ring-substituted methyl
group. The latter must contend with steric interactions with
the imino lone-pair (in the trans configuration) or the imino
hydrogen (in the cis configuration) which may yield
significant barriers to rotation and, consequently, a higher
frequency torsional motion. In any case, the smaller quantum
yield for 2-MIP has important ramifications for the jet studies
(
vide infra).
Conclusion
The solvents’effect on the absorption and fluorescence
spectra of MIP indicates that the ππ* transition shifts to
higher energies (shorter wavelengths) in polar solvents due
to solvent interactions and the formation of the pyridinium
cation. The fluorescence spectra are characterized by a
relatively small intensity in hexane compared with polar
solvents, such as water. Another major difference is
illustrated by the smooth absorption band obtained in water
while in hexane the spectrum exhibits evidence for Franck–
Condon activity in various vibrational modes. We have
recorded the fluorescence spectra of 1-MIP in a number of
polar solvents (methanol, acetonitrile, and DMSO), and have
observed a similar blue-shift. The absorption spectrum of
MIP in hydrocarbon solvents can be understood as being the
result of a ππ* state that is close in energy to a nπ* state. The
close proximity can lead to vibronic interactions and to
distortions of the excited state potential surfaces, as has been
Fig. 9. Fluorescence spectra of 1-MIP in acetonitrile
A), water (B) and methanol (C) with the same
excitation wavelength, 230 nm, and similar
concentrations.
(
It is clear that the fluorescent yield of both 1-MIP and 2-
MIP is considerably enhanced in polar solvents. This is most
noticeable in the series of spectra presented in Figure 9. The
fluorescence quantum yield is seen to increase as the polarity
9
of the solvent is increased; MeOH (µ = 1.70 D) < H O (µ =
observed for many similar N-heterocyclic compounds. In
2
1
.85 D) < CH CN (µ = 3.92 D). Interactions between nearby
polar solvents, however, the states are shifted in energy due
to solvent–solute interactions which decreases the surface
distortion. Thus, an increase in the fluorescence yield results
from a decrease in the rate of non-radiative processes.
3
ππ* and nπ* states can lead to a marked reduction in
fluorescence quantum yield in non-polar solvents due to an
enhancement in the rate of non-radiative processes such as
internal conversion. In polar solvents, the energy gap
between the two electronic states is increased, diminishing
state mixing, and resulting in a much increased quantum
yield for fluorescence. Such a phenomenon has been termed
Experimental
Synthesis of Methyl-2(1H)-pyridinimine (1-MIP) and 1,2-Dimethyl
pyridinimine (2-MIP)
9
The preparation of the iminopyridine compounds, specifically 1-
methyl-2(1H)-pyridinimine, utilized a modified version of Taylor and
coworkers’ procedure13 in the following manner. A mixture of 2-
aminopyridine (Aldrich Chemical Co.) and methyl iodide was placed in
a 150 ml round-bottomed flask, and warmed on a steam bath until an
exothermic reaction commenced. The reaction was then allowed to
continue for about 3 h. After the reaction was complete, the mixture was
cooled and dried in vacuum. The mixture was recrystallized three times
from absolute ethanol (Midwest Grain Products Co.) to give the 1-
methyl-2(1H)-pyridinium iodide salt. The salt was then dissolved in a
one equivalent solution of sodium hydroxide and stirred vigorously for
about 15 min. The extraction of the free base with ether was followed
by drying over anhydrous sodium sulfate followed by filtration. A
rotary evaporator was then used to remove residual solvent and yield the
the proximity effect and our results are in accordance with
this mechanism.
The quantum yield for 1-MIP in hexane, while relatively
small, is still sufficient to measure emission spectra and
would seem to indicate that this molecule is amenable to
supersonic jet studies. While we did not attempt to
quantitatively measure the quantum yield, Fujimoto and
5
11
coworkers have reported a value of Φ = 3.7 ± 0.9 × 10– .
F
We have observed that the corresponding yield for 2-MIP in
hexane is much reduced. Based on the measured differences
in absorption coefficients we estimate that the quantum yield
of 2-MIP is about 60 times less than that of 1-MIP. In contrast,
1
-MIP product, which was a viscous yellow–brown liquid. Yields were
Fujimoto et al.11 report a value of Φ = 3.6 ± 0.9 × 10 for
–5
F
typically 15% to 20%.
2
-MIP, a number that is essentially identical to the yield
The nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) spectrum of 1-MIP in
determined for 1-MIP.
CDCl was recorded with a Bruker AC300 NMR. The major peaks
3
1
observed in the H n.m.r were: δ 7.98, t, J 11.9 Hz, 1H; 7.72, t, J 8.7 Hz,
The source of the apparent discrepancy in the observed
quantum yield for 2-MIP is not clear. It is reasonable to
suppose that 2-MIP has a smaller yield for fluorescence. The
low frequency modes due to the presence of the second
methyl rotor in 2-MIP can accelerate the rate of non-
1
H; 6.97, d, J 11.9 Hz, 1H; 6.74, d, J 11.9 Hz, 1H; 3.68, s, CH .
3
The mass spectrum was recorded with a commercial magnetic mass
spectrometer as follows: a 10 ng/µl sample of 1-MIP was prepared and
then injected into a gas chromatograph (Model 5890, Hewlett Packard)
which is connected to VG Trio-1 mass spectrometer (Fison Instr.) for