in turn be prepared from diol 1 by diol protection, ketal
deprotection, 1,3-carbonyl transposition, enone formation,
and enone R-functionalization. It was our intention that the
bridgehead axial methyl group would control the config-
uration of the diol functionality in 1: reduction of hydroxy
ketone 4 (f 1) and R-hydroxylation of silyl enol ether
5 (f 4) should both occur on the face opposite to the
axial methyl group to deliver the requisite trans-1,2-diol
motif. Silyl enol ether 5 would be derived from enone 6
(by γ-enolization), itself obtained from enone 7 via a 1,3-
carbonyl transposition (Wharton rearrangement of an
epoxy ketone7 was envisaged). Previously, Grieco had
developed an approach for the R-hydroxylation of enones
such as 6,8 and the preparation of enone 7 from bicyclic
enone 2 has been described.9
(catalytic Pd(OAc)2/oxygen), none of 7 was formed and a
Nicolaou-style12 IBX-mediated oxidation of ketone 9 gave
only a 14% yield of enone 7.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Bicyclic Enone 7
Scheme 2. Detailed Retrosynthetic Analysis of Diol 1
Next, we needed to carry out a 1,3-carbonyl transposi-
tion on enone 7 to place the ketone adjacent to the bridge-
head methyl group (as in 6). For this, a nucleophilic
epoxidation of enone 7 and a Wharton rearrangementꢀ
oxidation were planned. However, all attempts at directly
epoxidizing 7 (e.g., H2O2 and NaOH or Triton B) met
with failure, presumably due to steric hindrance from the
neighboring methyl and ketal groups. Instead, we resorted
to a three-step reduction, m-CPBA epoxidation, and oxi-
dationwhich, althoughitinvolvedmoresteps, was efficient
and was ultimately telescoped successfully.
Multigram quantities of racemic enone 7 were prepared
as outlined in Scheme 3. First, 2-methyl-1,3-cyclohexa-
dione and ethyl vinyl ketone were reacted in a DABCO-
mediated Robinson annelation6 to give, after elimination,
bicyclic enone 2 in 78% yield. Ketal formation to give 8
(81% yield) was accomplished using ethylene glycol and
catalytic p-TsOH under DeanꢀStark conditions. Next,
stereoselective reduction of enone 8 using lithium in
ammonia (in the presence of 1 equiv of H2O) gave ketone
9 in 61% yield. Over-reduction to the secondary alcohol
was a complicating factor although the alcohol could be
isolated and oxidized to give additional quantities of 9.
Finally, the enone in 7 was constructed using a stoichio-
metric Pd(OAc)2-mediated oxidation10 of an intermediate
silyl enol ether (formed by regioselective deprotona-
tion of ketone 9 using LDA), as developed by Saegusa.9
This delivered a single diastereomer of enone 7 in 82% yield.
Using the Larock modification11 of the Saegusa oxidation
Initially, the steps were separately explored (Scheme 4).
Luche reduction (NaBH4/CeCl3 7H2O) of enone 7 gave
3
a 94:6 mixture of diastereomeric alcohols from which an
89% yield of alcohol 1013 was isolated. Then, m-CPBA
epoxidation of allylic alcohol 10 gave an inseparable 88:12
mixture of epoxides 11 in 79% yield. The relative stereo-
chemistry of epoxides 11 is of no consequence (vide infra)
and remains unassigned.14 Oxidation with Dess-Martin
periodinane (DMP) delivered an 88:12 mixture of epoxy-
ketones 12 (70% yield). A more efficient synthesis of 12
was achieved by telescoping these three reactions. By
working-up the first two reactions and carrying the crude
products forward withoutpurification, an85:15 mixture of
epoxy-ketones 12 was obtained after chromatography
(73% yield from 7) (Scheme 4).
Treatment of the 85:15 mixture of diastereomeric epoxy-
ketones12withhydrazine hydrate (50% aqueous solution)
and acetic acid led to the allylic alcohols 13 (characterized
(13) The relative configuration of alcohol 10 was assigned as shown
due to the presence of a characteristic trans-diaxial 3J coupling between
the CHOH and CHMe protons in the 1H NMR spectrum (3J = 8.5 Hz).
(14) It is tempting to assign the major epoxide as being trans to the
axial methyl group in a sterically controlled epoxidation of 10. However,
there is also the potential of hydrogen-bonded directed epoxidation cis
to the hydroxyl group (and hence cis to the methyl group), and this
should not be ruled out given the enhanced cis-directing potential of an
equatorial hydroxyl group. See: (a) Chamberlain, P.; Roberts, M. L;
Whitham, G. G. J. Chem. Soc. (B) 1970, 1374. (b) Hoveyda, A. H.;
Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1307.
(7) Wharton, P. S.; Bohlen, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3615.
(8) (a) Spohn, R. F.; Grieco, P. A.; Nargund, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1987, 28, 2491. (b) Grieco, P. A.; Collins, J. L.; Moher, E. D.; Fleck, T. J.;
Gross, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6078.
(9) Poigny, S.; Guyot, M.; Samadi, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5890.
(10) Ito, Y.; Hirao, T.; Saegusa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1011.
(11) Larock, R. C.; Hightower, T. R.; Kraus, G. A.; Hahn, P.; Zheng,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2423.
(12) Nicolaou, K. C.; Zhong, Y.-L.; Baran, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 7596.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 2, 2013
395