63 Page 2 of 7
J. Chem. Sci.
(2019) 131:63
molecule possessing large Stokes shift to overcome the dissolved in 20 mL ethanol at 50 ◦C. 3-tert-butyl-2-hydroxy-
5-methylbenzaldehyde (1) (0.39 g, 2.043 mmoL) was dis-
solved in 20 mL of ethanol and added into mixture dropwise.
The reaction mixture was degassed by argon-vacuum system.
The reaction temperature was adjusted to boiling temper-
ature and stirred under reflux for 6 h. The course of the
reaction was checked by TLC (chloroform-EtOAC 10/1).
After the reaction was completed, the solution was evapo-
rated to 1/3 volume. The precipitated product was filtered off,
washed with ethanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator. Yield:
ν
mentioned challenge.
The condensation of an aromatic aldehyde deriva-
tive with tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) in a 3:1 ratio
resulted in a Schiff base structure called tripodal back-
bone with ternary imine group. The synthesis and
characterization of its boron complex (BF2)3L (3) as
flexible fluorophore with three BF2 units was performed.
To the best knowledge, there are a few examples on the
tripodal ligand-like and their metal complexes in the lit-
erature.15–17
92% (0.415 g). FT-IR (UATR-TWOTM
)
max/cm−1: 3040
(Ar, C-H), 2947–2810 (Aliph., C-H), 1631 (C = N), 1594
The optical and fluorescence properties of the pre-
(Ar, C = C), 1437–1357 (Aliph., C-C), 1264, 1046, 842,
pared tris-metallic boron complex (3) were also inves- 783. 1H-NMR (CHCl3) δ (ppm): 7.63 (s, 3H), 7.09 (d, 3H),
5.41 (s, 3H), 3.49–3.47 (t, 6H), 2.84–2.81 (t, 6H), 2.03 (s,
9H), 1.43 (s, 27H). 13C-NMR (CHCl3) δ (ppm): 167.07,
158.27, 136.68, 130.47, 130.06, 126.42, 118.64, 58.38, 56.38,
tigated. It was observed that the obtained chromophore
showed high blue fluorescence in solution with a large
Stokes shift.
ε
34.90, 29.64, 20.54. UV–Vis (DMSO): max (nm) (log ) 266
λ
(4.25), 330(3.83). MS(MALDI-TOF):m/z670.128[M+1]+,
692.155 [M + Na]+.
2. Experimental
2.1 Chemicals and instruments
2.2b Synthesis of L(BF2)3 Complex (3): In a 100 mL
round bottom flask, DIPEA (0.8 mL) was added to a stirred
solution of ligand (2) (0.2 g, 0.3 mmoL) in dry dichloroethane
(30 mL) and degassed with argon at room temperature. After
the mixture was stirred for 15 min at 60 ◦C, BF3.O(Et)2 (0.6
mL, 4.5 mmol) was◦added slowly to the resulting mixture and
kept for 3 h at 85 C under argon atmosphere. The course
of the reaction was monitored with TLC (chloroform-EtOH
5/1). The completed reaction was diluted with CHCl3 (40
mL) and quenched by adding NaHCO3 solution. The mixture
was extracted with CHCl3 (3 × 15 mL). The CHCl3 phase
was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was evaporated to
dryness. The obtained crude product was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel eluting with CHCl3/methanol-
100/1 to obtain pure boron complex (3). Yield: 42% (0.102
ν
2-tertbutyl-4-methylphenol, urotropin, glacial acetic acid,
tris (2-aminoethyl), chloroform (CHCl3), ethylacetate
(EtOAc), methanol, ethanol (EtOH), dichloroethane, N,N-
diisopropylethylamine
(DIPEA),
dimethylformamide
(DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran (THF),
acetonitrile, boron trifluoride diethyl etherate BF3.O(Et)2,
NaHCO3 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All solvents
were dried and purified according to the procedures given by
Perrin and Armarego18 before using. Thin layer chromatog-
raphy (TLC) based on silica gel 60-HF254 as an adsorbent
was applied for monitoring the progress of the reactions and
chemicalpurityofthecompounds. Silicagel(Merckgrade60)
was used at column chromatography. Infrared spectra were
acquired on a PerkinElmer UATR-TWO diamond attenuated
total reflectance (ATR) spectrophotometer. Electronic spectra
were obtained on a Hitachi U-2900 UV-Vis spectrophotome-
ter. Fluorescence spectra were recorded from Hitachi F-2710
Fluorescence spectrofluorometer with quartz cell of 1 cm at
g). FT-IR (UATR-TWOTM
)
max/cm−1: 3012 (Ar, C-H),
2955–2857 (Aliph., C-H), 1642 (C = N), 1568 (Ar, C = C),
1
1446–1363 (Aliph., C-C), 1245, 1120, 1024, 945, 823. H-
NMR (DMSO) δ (ppm): 8.43 (s, 3H), 7.41 (d, 3H), 6.58 (s,
3H), 3.77 (t, 6H), 2.96 (t, 6H), 2.13 (s, 9H), 1.36 (s, 27H).
13C-NMR (DMSO) δ (ppm): 167.17, 155.20, 138.40, 136.62,
129.57, 128.81, 115.81, 52.89, 50.82, 34.85, 29.42, 20.38. 11B
1
room temperature. H and 13C NMR spectra were carried
out with Bruker AVANCE 600 MHz NMR Spectrometer and
Varian Mercury Plus 300 MHz spectrometer. Mass analysis
was performed on Bruker microTOF. Fluorescence lifetimes
were measured using a time-correlated single photon count-
ing setup (TCSPC) (FluoTime 200, Picoquant GmbH) with a
diode laser (LDH-P-670 with PDL 800-B, Picoquant GmbH,
670 nm, 20 MHz repetition rate, 44 ps pulse width).
(BF .O(Et) , CDCl3): δ 0.382 (t). UV–Vis (DMSO): max
λ
3
2
ε
(nm) (log ) 276 (4.72), 362 (4.19). MS (MALDI-TOF): m/z
794.336 [M − F]+, 835.372 [M + Na]+, 852.356 [M + Na +
H2O]+.
2.2 Synthesis
3. Result and Discussion
The synthesis of 3-tert-Butyl-2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzalde-
hyde (1) was accomplished according to the reported work.17
The spectroscopic results are consistent with the literature.
3.1 Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization
As a first step, 3-tert-Butyl-2-hydroxy-5-methylben-
zaldehyde (1) was obtained from the reaction of 2-
2.2a Synthesis of Ligand (2): In a 100 mL flask,
tris (2-aminoethyl) amine (0.102 mL, 0.68 mmoL) was tert-butyl-4-methylphenol with urotropine in glacial