C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
step. Oxidative cleavage of the double bond completes the synthesis
of one-half of hamigeran B.
selenium dioxide and bromination completes the sequence (eq 4).
Comparison of the data to that previously reported1 confirmed
their identity.
-4
Direct reaction with lithiated dimethyl orcinol 9 followed by
oxidation with the Dess-Martin periodinane gave the full carbon
count of the target. With the vision that the last C-C bond would
9
be formed by an intramolecular Heck reaction, the vinyl triflate
was reductively cleaved to alkene 12 and the aryl ether was
converted to the requisite aryl triflate 2. The Heck reaction produced
two isomeric alkenes, 14 and 15, in addition to the expected alkene
1
3, surprisingly, since it involves a highly strained tetrasubstituted
In summary, a new class of nucleophiles allows asymmetric
allylation of five-membered rings in high yield and enantioselec-
tivity. The importance of the nature of the nucleophile on the
enantioselectivity is highlighted by the critical dependence on the
presence of lithium alkoxides, which presumably affects the nature
of the enolate clusters. The virtue of this class is revealed by a
double bond exocyclic to the ring. Use of carbonate rather than
tertiary amine bases minimizes the problem of simple hydrogenoly-
sis of the triflate. With either dppe or dppp as ligands,1 the desired
alkene 13 was isolated in 42-48% yield, which increased to 58%
with dppb.11
0
15-step asymmetric synthesis of hamigeran B from 2-methylcy-
clopentanone in 10% overall yield. The unusual nature of the
structure is highlighted by two abnormal reactivities: first, the
formation of an exocyclic tetrasubstituted double bond during the
Heck studies and second, the high propensity to give net reduction
of the trisubstituted double bond of 13a from the more hindered
face. The orthogonality between the thermodynamic and kinetic
control in hydrogenation by choice of catalyst is noteworthy.
Hydrogenation from the least hindered face (see Figure 1) to
give the desired stereochemistry of C-6 seemed to be straightfor-
ward. To avoid reduction of the carbonyl group, the free phenol
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Institutes of Health
(GM-13598) and the National Science Foundation for their generous
support of our programs. Dr. Carole Pissot-Soldermann thanks the
Swiss National Science Foundation and La Soci e´ t e´ de Secours des
Amis des Sciences, and Mr. Irwin Chen and Dr. Gretchen M.
Schroeder thank the U. S. National Science Foundation for
fellowships. We thank Prof. D. Clive for experimental details
regarding the bromination step.
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental procedures
(PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
Figure 1. Conformational Depiction of Phenol 13a.
3 2 2
was liberated with BBr (CH Cl , -78 °C). Upon hydrogenation
over Pd/C, a single diastereomer did result. X-ray crystallography,
however, revealed the product 16 to have exclusively the C-6 epi
configuration (eq 3, path a).
References
(
1) Wellington, K. D.; Cambie, R. C.; Rutledge, P. S.; Bergquist, P. R. J.
Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 79.
(
(
(
(
2) Nicolaou, K. C.; Gray, D.; Tae, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3679.
3) Clive, D. L. J.; Wang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3406.
4) Clive, D. L. J.; Wang, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7731.
5) For reviews, see (a) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103,
2
921. (b) Trost, B. M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50, 1. (c) Trost, B. M.;
Van Vranken, D. L. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 395. (d) Trost, B. M.; Lee, C.
B. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: New York, 2000; pp 593-650.
(
6) Derived in one pot from reaction of 2-methylcyclopentanone with ethyl
4 9
formate (NaOC H -t, PhH) concentrating, diluting with tert-butyl alcohol,
acidifying with sulfuric acid to pH 2-3, and heating at reflux in the
presence of MgSO
4
, 70% yield mp 52-53 °C.
(
(
7) Trost, B. M.; Schroeder, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6759.
8) Lipschutz, B. H. In Organometallics in Synthesis; Schlosser, M., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1994; p 286.
(
9) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3009.
(
10) Trost, B. M.; Tang, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2795.
11) After completion of our work, Mehta reported a strategy similar to ours
that resulted in a synthesis of 6-epi-hamigeran B. In his intramolecular
Heck reaction, he reports a 2:1 mixture of 13 and the simple hydrogenoly-
sis product in a total 55-60% yield but does not report the tetrasubstituted
olefin. See: Mehta, G.; Shinde, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7049.
12) (a) Nishimura, S.; Mochizuki, F.; Kobayakawa, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
(
Hypothesizing that this product must arise by an equilibration
in the semihydrogenation intermediate because the final reductive
(
(
elimination step is too slow, attention turned to iridium since it is
1
970, 43, 1919. (b) Nishimura, S.; Sakamoto, H.; Ozawa, T. Chem. Lett.
known to minimize such equilibrations.1
2,13
Gratifyingly, hydro-
1973, 855.
13) Mehta and Shinde report that variation of catalyst did not resolve the
unfavorable diastereoselectivity of the hydrogenation but fail to record
what catalysts were tried.
genation once again proceeded with complete diastereoselectivity
eq 3, path b). X-ray crystallography confirmed the correct
stereochemistry as in structure 17 for all centers. Oxidation with
(
JA0497025
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 14, 2004 4481