Page 3 of 4
Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
2
PPh3
I
[
Cu ]-PPh3 + O=PPh3 + NO
NO loss in the reaction of these copper nitrite complexes with
i
DOI: 10.1039/C6CC08745K
CuII] O
1
(
a)
b)
[
N
benzene-d6
5
PPh and CNAr. Reaction of [Bu N]{[ Pr NN ]Cu(κ -NO )} (2)
2
3
4
2
F6
O
2 CNAr
I
3
[Cu ]-CNAr + NO
with 1 equiv. PPh or ArNC in THF simply results in substitution
3
I
of the nitrite anion at [Cu ] to give adducts
6
5
or
6, respectively
15
15
(
Scheme 4b). As followed by N NMR in THF, use of
1 15
N
PPh3
[Cu ]-PPh3 + NO2-
I
O
O
i
substituted [Bu N]{[ Pr NN ]Cu(
15
- NO )} (2- N) (
κ
δ
132 ppm)
4
2
F6
2
(
[CuI]
N
THF-d8
5
results in observation of the free nitrite anion (
S9).
δ 237 ppm) (Fig.
CNAr
I
-
2
[Cu ]-CNAr + NO2
6
In summary, the fluorinated
I
β-diketiminate ligand
Pr NN ] supports anionic Cu and neutral Cu nitrite
i
II
[
2
F6
Scheme 4. Reactivity of (a) copper(II) and (b) copper(I) nitrite complexes
and with PPh and CNAr.
2
II
as well as a neutral, mixed valence Cu / Cu
I
3
3
complexes
2
and
3
II
. The Cu center in
nitrite species
4
3
activates nitrite towards
in pentane (Fig. S15) displays a well-resolved four-line
reduction to NO by PPh and CNAr while the corresponding
3
1
hyperfine splitting with g = 2.050, g = 2.200, A ( N) = 48
4
⊥
‖
⊥
63/65
anionic copper(I) complex
2 simply loses the nitrite anion upon
1
4
63/65
MHz, A ( N) = 49 MHz, A (
⊥
Cu) = 35 MHz, A‖(
Cu) = 530
‖
interaction with these Lewis bases. OAT reactivity at copper(II)
results from the ability of the copper(II) center to also accept
an electron as nitrite undergoes reduction by one electron to
give NO, enabling the two-electron OAT reaction. Thus, these
studies reveal that NO may be also generated at copper(II),
adding to the NO formation pathway involving protonation of
MHz at 293K with superhyperfines from the β-diketiminate
nitrogen donors. Cyclic voltammetry of complex in THF
exhibits two quasi-reversible one-electron waves at E = -0.41
4
1
/2
+
and +0.38 V vs. Fc /Fc. These are assigned to the
II
I
I
I
-
II
Cu ](NO )[Cu ] / {[Cu ](NO )[Cu ]} and {[Cu ](NO )[Cu ]}
II
+
[
[
/
2
2
2
II
Cu ](NO )[Cu ] redox couples, respectively.
I
2
23,26
nitrite at copper(I).
i
We find that the copper(II) nitrite [ Pr NN ]Cu(
2
κ
-O N) (
2
3
)
2
F6
THW is grateful to the US National Science Foundation (NSF
CHE-1459090 and CHE-1337975 (X-ray)) as well as the
Georgetown Environment Initiative for financial support.
undergoes ready reduction at RT with PPh3 (Scheme 4a).
Addition of 2 equiv. PPh to in benzene results in a bleaching
over ca. 30 min with concomitant gas
3
3
of the green color of
3
31
evolution. Monitoring the reaction by P NMR spectroscopy Notes and references
shows clear formation of O=PPh3
(
δ
= 25.5 ppm) and
= 3.8 ppm). The phosphine adduct
may be independently prepared by addition of PPh to
1
.
M. T. Gladwin, A. N. Schechter, D. B. Kim-Shapiro, R. P. Patel, N. Hogg, S.
Shiva, R. O. Cannon, M. Kelm, D. A. Wink, M. G. Espey, E. H. Oldfield, R. M.
Pluta, B. A. Freeman, J. R. Lancaster, M. Feelisch and J. O. Lundberg, Nat.
Chem. Biol., 2005, 1, 308-314.
B. P. Luchsinger, E. N. Rich, Y. Yan, E. M. Williams, J. S. Stamler and D. J.
Singel, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2005, 99, 912-921.
J. Rodriguez, R. E. Maloney, T. Rassaf, N. S. Bryan and M. Feelisch, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 2003, 100, 336-341.
M. T. Gladwin, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2005, 1, 245-246.
i
[
Pr NN ]Cu(PPh ) (
5
) (δ
5
2
F6
3
3
i
2
[
Pr NN ]Cu(
η
-benzene)
gaseous product, vial-to-vial gas-trapping experiments
Figure S10) were performed. Trapping of the evolved gas with
the cobalt(II) porphyrin (TPP)Co(II) (TPP
(1). To identify and quantify the
2
F6
2.
3.
4.
12
(
=
tetraphenylporphyrin) leads to the formation of the 5.
J. O. Lundberg, M. T. Gladwin and E. Weitzberg, Nat. Rev. Drug Disc., 2015,
14, 623-641.
C. Frostell, M. D. Fratacci, J. C. Wain, R. Jones and W. M. Zapol, Circulation,
1991, 83, 2038-2047.
K. Cosby, K. S. Partovi, J. H. Crawford, R. P. Patel, C. D. Reiter, S. Martyr, B.
K. Yang, M. A. Waclawiw, G. Zalos, X. L. Xu, K. T. Huang, H. Shields, D. B.
Kim-Shapiro, A. N. Schechter, R. O. Cannon and M. T. Gladwin, Nat. Med.,
8
corresponding {Co(NO)} complex (TPP)Co(NO) in near
6.
quantitative yield, thereby indicating a clean stoichiometric
-
reduction of NO2 to NO in presence of phosphine. This
7.
reaction is extremely swift, even at -80 °C as evidenced by
-
1
-1
2003, 9, 1498-1505.
rapid decay of the λmax = 440 nm (1440 M cm ) band of
i
2
8.
S. Shiva, Z. Huang, R. Grubina, J. H. Sun, L. A. Ringwood, P. H. MacArthur,
X. L. Xu, E. Murphy, V. M. Darley-Usmar and M. T. Gladwin, Circ. Res.,
2007, 100, 654-661.
[
Pr NN ]Cu(κ -O N) (3) upon addition of PPh when followed
2 F6 2 3
by UV-vis spectroscopy in pentane.
The OAT reactivity of with PPh insisted us to investigate
the use of less oxophilic substrates such as isocyanides
9
1
1
.
S. Shiva, T. Rassaf, R. P. Patel and M. T. Gladwin, Cardiovasc. Res., 2011,
3
3
89, 566-573.
0.
1.
S. Basu, N. A. Azarova, M. D. Font, S. B. King, N. Hogg, M. T. Gladwin, S.
Shiva and D. B. Kim-Shapiro, J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283, 32590-32597.
E. I. Solomon, D. E. Heppner, E. M. Johnston, J. W. Ginsbach, J. Cirera, M.
Qayyum, M. T. Kieber-Emmons, C. H. Kjaergaard, R. G. Hadt and L. Tian,
Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 3659-3853.
M. Totzeck, U. B. Hendgen-Cotta, P. Luedike, M. Berenbrink, J. P. Klare, H.
J. Steinhoff, D. Semmler, S. Shiva, D. Williams, A. Kipar, M. T. Gladwin, J.
Schrader, M. Kelm, A. R. Cossins and T. Rassaf, Circulation, 2012, 126, 325-
(Scheme 4a). Addition of 2 equiv. ArNC (Ar = 2,6-Me C H ) to a
2 6 3
solution of 3 in benzene also leads to an instant color change
i
from green to orange with formation of [ Pr NN ]Cu(CNAr) (6)
2
F6
1
19
12.
in 52% yield as monitored by H and F NMR spectroscopy,
confirmed by the independent synthesis of by addition of
CNAr to . NO is released in 80% yield as measured by gas
trapping with (TPP)Co(NO) (Figure S11). Unfortunately, we did
6
3
34.
S. Hematian, M. A. Siegler and K. D. Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
8912-18915.
1
13.
1
not find evidence for the anticipated isocyanate O=C=NAr via 14.
GC-MS analysis of the reaction mixture, perhaps due to the
heightened reactivity of isocyanates. On the other hand, the 15.
S. Hematian, I. Kenkel, T. E. Shubina, M. Duerr, J. J. Liu, M. A. Siegler, I.
Ivanovic-Burmazovic and K. D. Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 6602-
6615.
A. C. Merkle and N. Lehnert, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 3355-3368.
B. A. Averill, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2951-2964.
L. B. Maia and J. J. G. Moura, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 5273-5357.
J. Goodwin, T. Kurtikyan, J. Standard, R. Walsh, B. Zheng, D. Parmley, J.
Howard, S. Green, A. Mardyukov and D. E. Przybyla, Inorg. Chem., 2005,
16.
17.
18.
addition of 2 equiv. dialkyl sulfides such as Et S to
2
3
leads to no
reaction under analogous conditions.
44, 2215-2223.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins