Uphill Photooxidation of NADH Analogues
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 106, No. 10, 2002 1907
molecular electron transfer from C60 to HV2+ (5.6 × 10 s
•
-
6 -1
TABLE 2: Quantum Yields (Φobs) of Photocatalytic
-
3
2+
-3
Oxidation of AcrH
2
(4.0 × 10 M) by HV (8.0 × 10 M)
-3
2+
at 8.0 × 10 M HV ) is much faster than the BET rate (3.2
-
6
in the Presence of ZnP-C60 (3.0 × 10 M) or
5 -1
×
10 s ) in an O2-saturated PhCN. This can be regarded as a
-
6
ZnP-H
2
P-C60 (3.0 × 10 M) in the Absence and Presence
potential rationale for the observation that the Φobs value of
the triad (ZnP-H2P-C60) system is little affected by the
presence of oxygen. Conversely, in the case of dyad (ZnP-
C60) the BET rate, especially in an O2-saturated PhCN solution
of O
2
in PhCN
Φ
obs
-
3
catlyst
O
2
) 0 M
O
2
) 8.5 × 10
M
7
-1 13
ZnP-C60
ZnP-H P-C60
0.25
0.15
0.02
0.14
(1.5 × 10 s ) is much faster than the electron transfer rate,
•- 2+
2
C60 / HV .
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that ZnP-linked-C60
systems act as efficient photocatalysts for the uphill oxidation
of NADH analogues by HV . The catalytic performance of
the triad (ZnP-H2P-C60) system, which exhibits a much longer
lifetime of the radical ion pair, is little affected by O2, whereas
the catalytic reactivity of the dyad (ZnP-C60) is reduced
significantly by the pure presence of O2.
0
ox
23
potential of AcrH2 (E vs SCE ) 0.81 V) compared to that
0
13
of BNAH (E vs SCE ) 0.57 V). In this case, electron
transfer from AcrH2 to ZnP is endergonic by 0.10 eV and, in
turn, thermodynamically unfavorable. However, AcrH2 is
known to undergo a rapid deprotonation to produce subsequently
2+
ox
•
+
•
+
•
23
AcrH . Following this deprotonation step, an electron transfer
•
•+
+
from AcrH to ZnP , forming AcrH , becomes now highly
•
exergonic judging from the low oxidation potential of the AcrH
species (E ) -0.46 V, which is equivalent to the one-
electron reduction potential of AcrH ).
stoichiometry implies also a two-electron oxidation of AcrH2
by two equivalents of HV2+ (eq 4), although the actual electron
transfer event involving AcrH2 is much slower than the
corresponding oxidation of BNAH, leading consequently to the
smaller quantum yields.
0
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a grant-in-
aid for Scientific Research Priority Area (No. 11228205) from
the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan,
the Sumitomo Foundation, and the Office of Basic Energy
Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy (contribution No.
NDRL-4295 from the Notre Dame Radiation Laboratory).
ox
+
25,26
Thus, the overall
The amount of free energy (∆G), stored in the photochemical
References and Notes
2+
oxidation of AcrH2 by HV , is obtained as 1.28 eV (124 kJ
-
1
(1) (a) Imahori, H.; Y. Sakata, Y. AdV. Mater. 1997, 9, 537. (b) Guldi,
D. M. Chem. Commun. 2000, 321. (c) Imahori, H.; Sakata, Y. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 2445. (d) Fukuzumi, S.; Guldi, D. M. In Electron Transfer in
Chemistry; Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; Vol.
2, pp 270-326.
mol ) based on the difference between the redox potentials of
+
26
2+
•+
the AcrH2/AcrH (0.22 V vs SCE) and HV /HV (-0.42
V vs SCE) redox couples (eq 5). In the case of BNAH
0
+
27
(
E (BNAH/BNA ) ) 0.02 V), the corresponding value is
(
2) (a) Page, C. C.; Moser, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Nature 1999,
-1
obtained as 0.88 eV (85 kJ mol ). In the dark, the back reaction
4
02, 47. (b) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish,
K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 2000;
Vol. 8, pp 153-190. (c) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L. In Electron
Transfer in Chemistry; Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
0
+
0
2+
•+
∆
G ) 2F[E (AcrH /AcrH )] - E (HV /HV )] (5)
2
2
001; Vol. 3, pp 272-336.
is extremely slow because of the kinetic barrier for a highly
(3) (a) Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Guldi, D. M.; Luo, C.; Fujitsuka, M.;
•
+
0
endergonic electron transfer from HV (E ) -0.42 V vs
Ito, O.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2607. (b)
Luo, C.; Guldi, D. M.; Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Sakata, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 6535. (c) Imahori, H.; El-Khouly, M. E.; Fujitsuka, M.;
Ito, O.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 325.
(4) Fukuzumi, S.; Imahori, H. In Electron Transfer in Chemistry;
Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; Vol. 2, pp 927-
ox
+
0
red
15
SCE) to BNA (E ) -1.08 V vs SCE), although the
2
8,29
overall two-electron process is exergonic.
Effects of O2 on the Photocatalytic Systems. In the presence
•
+
of oxygen, the lifetimes of both radical ion pairs (i.e., ZnP -
966.
•
-
•+
•-
C60 and ZnP -H2P-C60 ) are reduced significantly because
(5) (a) Imahori, H.; Norieda, H.; Yamada, H.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamazaki,
of an oxygen-catalyzed back electron transfer (BET) processes
I.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 100. (b) Imahori,
H.; Yamada, H.; Ozawa, S.; Ushida, K.; Sakata, Y. Chem. Commun. 1999,
1165. (c) Imahori, H.; Yamada, H.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamazaki, I.; Sakata,
Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2099.
•
-
•+ 13
•-
•-
between C60 and ZnP . An intermolecular ET from C60
to O2 occurs via the coordination of O2 to ZnP to yield O2
bound to ZnP , followed by a rapid intramolecular ET from
O2 to ZnP in the O2 -ZnP complex to regenerate O2.
•
+
•
+
(6) (a) Vaidyalingam, A. S.; Coutant, M. A.; Dutta, P. K. In Electron
•
-
•+
•-
•+
13
Transfer in Chemistry; Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
2
4
001; Vol. 3, pp 412-486. (b) Borja, M.; Dutta, P. K. Nature 1993, 362,
3.
Such a binding of the radical anion to metal ion is known to
accelerate the ET process.30,31 The impact that such a reduction
in lifetimes of the radical ion pairs has on the photocatalytic
AcrH2 oxidation was examined by deriving the quantum yield
(7) (a) Hurst, J. K.; Khairutdinov. In Electron Transfer in Chemistry;
Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; Vol. 3, pp 578-
623. (b) Tabushi, I.; Kugimiya, S.; Mizutani, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 1658. (c) Handman, J.; Harriman, A.; Porter, G. Nature 1984, 307,
+
of formation of AcrH from O2-saturated PhCN solutions (see
534.
32
the Experimental Section). The quantum yields under O2-
(8) (a) Steinberg-Yfrach, G.; Liddell, P. A.; Hung, S.-C.; Moore, A.
saturated conditions are also listed in Table 2.33
L.; Gust, D.; Moore, T. A. Nature 1997, 385, 239. (b) Steinberg-Yfrach,
G.; Rigaud, J.-L.; Durantini, E. N.; Moore, A. L.; Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.
Nature 1998, 392, 479.
9) Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 3rd ed.; Freeman: New York, 1988;
Chapter 17.
(10) Fukuzumi, S. In AdVances in Electron Transfer Chemistry; Mariano,
P. S., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1992; pp 67-175.
11) Fukuzumi, S.; Tanaka, T. Photoinduced Electron Transfer; Fox,
M. A., Chanon, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1988; Part C, Chap. 10.
(12) Koper, N. W.; Jonker, S. A.; Verhoeven, J. W.; van Dijk, C. Recl.
TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1985, 104, 296.
13) Fukuzumi, S.; Imahori, H.; Yamada, H.; El-Khouly, M. E.;
Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O.; Guldi, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2571.
14) Yamada, K.; Imahori, H.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamazaki, I.; Sakata, Y.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 895.
Surprisingly, the Φobs value (0.14) of the triad (ZnP-H2P-
C60) system is little affected by molecular oxygen as compared
to the value (0.15) found in the absence of O2. In contrast to
the triad, the Φobs value (0.02) of the dyad (ZnP-C60) system
becomes significantly smaller than the corresponding value
(
(
(
0.25) in the absence of O2. It should be noted that the kBET
4
-1
5 -1
value of the triad increases from 4.8 × 10 s to 3.2 × 10 s
in the absence and presence of O2, respectively. This value is,
(
however, still significantly smaller than the kBET value of the
6
-1 13
dyad, even in the absence of O2 (1.3 × 10 s ). Furthermore,
(
in the case of the triad (ZnP-H2P-C60), the rate of inter-