Table 5 Structural data and electrostatic substituent parameters *(k cos h cos h /R3) of the esters RCO C H (NO ) . The e†ective dipole
1
1
2
2
6
3
2 2
moment of the methoxy group is calculated via the superposition of the two CÈO dipoles in the direction of the CÈO bond. (Substituent
parameter: D nm~3; rate constants k and k taken from Table 3 at 25 ¡C)
0
nCCX
(¡)
Rest R
Bonding
d/nm
R/nm
cos h
cos h
k
/D
*/(k cos cos h /R3)
log k/k
1
2
ChX
1
1
2
0
CÈC
CÈN
CÈH
OÈC
0.154
0.147
0.107
0.143
CH
CH OCH
109.5
109.5
(105)
110.0
0.376
0.383
0.362
0.402
0.892
0.882
[0.4
0.74
(1.1)
1.46
0.0
7.1
0.0
1.3
3
2
3
(OÈCH )
3
CH Cl
ClÈC
0.176
0.390
0.437
0.871
11.8
2.2
2
with the substituent parameter according to eqn. (8)
moments (k
Imidazole
\ 3.87 D14 and
k
\ 1.85 D15; 1
H2O
D B 3.335 64 ] 10~30 C m) is 2.09. The consistency of the
two values is remarkably good, taking into account that, on
the one hand, the dipole moments are determined in the gas
phase and, on the other hand, the slopes in Fig. 3 contain the
inÑuence of the solvent water on the reacting molecules and
the transition state. This result shows that the solvation e†ects
in the two series of esters remain nearly constant and play
only a minor role in the discussion of the inÑuence of polar
substituents on the reaction rate. The inÑuence of the two dif-
ferent leaving groups on the reaction rate is eliminated in the
A
k cos h cos h B Ak cos h cos h
B
1
1
2
1
1
2
*
\
R3
R3
A
k cos h cos h
B
1
1
2
[
(8)
R3
0
In this model of the substituent parameter it is assumed, that
the ratio (R/a) in eqn. (6) remains constant in the di†erent
molecules. The atomic distances, bond angles, and dipole
moments are taken from standard tables.11,12 In the scope of
this model, the geometrical parameters of stable compounds
are taken also for the unstable transition states. Because only
energy di†erences are discussed, this procedure is justiÐed.
The length R is determined as the distance between the
centre of the dipole of the imidazole and the centre of the
respective shifts of the rate constants, log(k/k ).
Recent quantum-mechanical calculations of the neutral
hydrolysis of polar substituted ethyl acetates16 at the ab initio
level in the gas phase conÐrm the assumption that electro-
negative substituents in the acyl moiety decrease the energy
barrier of the tetrahedral transition state.
0
substituent dipole CÈX (X \ OCH , Cl for the polar substi-
3
tuted esters, and H for the reference molecule with Index 0).
The former point is calculated from the bond lengths and
angles of the planar imidazole molecule13 and from its charge
distribution14 as the midpoint between the negative and the
positive charge. The latter point is calculated as the midpoint
of the CÈX bond from standard bond lengths and angles with
the assumption r \ 90¡. The relevant data for the calculations
are given in Table 5.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the ““Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
(Frankfurt/Main)ÏÏ for Ðnancial support.
Fig. 3 shows the function log(k/k ) \ f M*[(k cos h cos
References
0
1
1
h )/R3]N according to this electrostatic model. The linearity of
2
1
G. Schmeer, C. Six and J. Steinkirchner, J. Solution Chem., 1999,
28, 211.
the function (line 1 in the Ðgure) is fulÐlled in the whole range.
Line (2) in Fig. 3 is the straight line obtained from the
neutral hydrolysis of ethyl acetates,4 which is fulÐlled over
seven decades for the rate constants.
2
3
4
5
E. K. Euranto, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., A 2, 1970, 152, 1.
J. F. Kirsch and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 837.
G. Schmeer and J. Barthel, Z. Phys. Chem. N.F., 1984, 140, 17.
D. E. Schmidt and F. H. Westheimer, Biochemistry, 1971, 10,
1249.
The di†erence in slope is mainly due to the di†erent dipole
moments (k ) of water and imidazole. The ratio of the two
2
6
D. B. Olsen, T. W. Hepburn, S. Lee, B. M. Martin, P. S. Mariano
and D. Dunaway-Mariano, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1992, 296,
144.
slopes is f \ 2.47, whereas the ratio of the two dipole
7
8
9
V. V. Katyshkina and M. Y. Kraft, J. Gen. Chem. USSR, 1959,
29, 65.
M. L. Bender and B. W. Turnquest, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79,
1656.
W. P. Jencks and M. Gilchrist, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 2622.
10 K. Kohler, R. Skora and E. H. Cordes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966,
88, 3577.
11 A. D. Mitchell, L. C. Cross and L. E. Sutton, in T able of Inter-
atomic Distances and ConÐguration in Molecules and Ions, Chemi-
cal Society, London, Specialist Publ. No. 11, 1958, pp. 1.
12 O. Exner, in Dipole Moments in Organic Chemistry, Georg
Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 1975.
13 B. M. Craven, R. K. McMullan, J. D. Bell and H. C. Freeman,
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B, 33, 2585.
14 R. D. Brown and B. A. W. Coller, T heor. Chim. Acta, 1967, 7,
259.
15 P. W. Atkins, in Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1990.
16 G. Schmeer and P. Sturm, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1,
1025.
Fig. 3 Linear dependence of the rate shift log(k/k ) at 25¡ C on the
0
electrostatic substituent parameter. Line (1) shows the linear depen-
Paper 9/01004A
dence of the imidazole catalyzed hydrolysis, line (2) that of the neutral
hydrolysis of the polar substituted ethyl acetates.4
2596
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 2593È2596